Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I?m curious. I had my second ever cycling lesson on Saturday. I can cycle and turn corners but told the instructor I wasn?t confident looking behind or signaling.


So the route we took involved me cycling from Burgess Park through Elephant and Castle, navigating Waterloo roundabout next to the IMAX to get onto Waterloo bridge and ending up in convent garden.

The instructor ended up in a different lane to me at the roundabout by the Imax with a bus driver leaning out his window shouting GO GO and another cyclist asking if I was okay.

Then we did it all in reverse.


The instructor at the end told me I should just get out and cycle and that the busier the road the better as traffic goes slowly.


Is this normal?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/235530-cycling-lesson-is-this-normal/
Share on other sites

I wouldn't know if it's normal but it doesn't sound very helpful .


I wonder if a mirror on handlebars would help you with the looking behind ? It's a long time since I learnt to cycle so this may not be current good practice .


And sympathies ,sounds v frightening .

I think a mirror might help although I think one of the points of looking behind is to try and make eye contact with the drivers and to make them aware you are going to do something. I think Saturday?s drivers may have read the fear in my eyes!


It?s tricky. I?m tempted to complain to the cycling provision providers but no one wants someone to lose their job. I also think it was a strangely positive experience in that I survived.

Wow. As a learner you should wear a hi-vis or L plate if on that traffic.


There are so many accidents that all drivers expect other drivers to be competent.


I think there are definitely positives to just going for it, but I would want to study the lanes so you know exactly what to do and where to go.. ..then you can be more confident with your hand signals...

Bellenden Belle Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I?m curious. I had my second ever cycling lesson

> on Saturday. I can cycle and turn corners but

> told the instructor I wasn?t confident looking

> behind or signaling.

>

> So the route we took involved me cycling from

> Burgess Park through Elephant and Castle,

> navigating Waterloo roundabout next to the IMAX to

> get onto Waterloo bridge and ending up in convent

> garden.

> The instructor ended up in a different lane to me

> at the roundabout by the Imax with a bus driver

> leaning out his window shouting GO GO and another

> cyclist asking if I was okay.

> Then we did it all in reverse.

>

> The instructor at the end told me I should just

> get out and cycle and that the busier the road the

> better as traffic goes slowly.

>

> Is this normal?


As a car driver I find this tale very disturbing that such inexperienced cyclists are on our busy routes. Your ?instructor? has questions to answer.

I think that for a second lesson that is pretty hard core! Was it a set number of lessons? I think if it was 5, that would be the fifth. Agree that you should certainly give feedback, it sounds as though he over-estimated your confidence maybe, he shouldn't lose his job but definately re-appraise the training.
Sounds a rubbish route for a cycle lesson tbh !! And you should develop the confidence to look around.. that's an important part of cycling .. but taking you around that route is very poor! Agree with eye contact with drivers ..good luck with cycling.. once you are proficient you will never look back (pardon the pun!)
Dunno about learning to cycle on the IMAX roundabout. I learnt to cycle as a kid, but when I picked it up again for commuting in my late twenties, I cycled on quiet streets/parks building up my confidence to the Highbury roundabout over some weeks. Be visible, take it easy, practice your turns in a park so you are balanced while turning and indicating. There are fools on the road, be visible and patient. It's really a great way to get about.

Re the mirrors - Any motorcycling training talks about checking mirrors all the time, but drills you to never mover out into traffic, move right, or basically do anything without a last second check over the shoulder. It's called a lifesaver.


Given how much more vulnerable people are on bikes I'd be following that example.

Always always assume the motorist hasn't seen you. Learning to look behind you (twice pkease) and indicating are pretty fundamental so please stay off the main roads (esp elephant and castle) until you get the confidence to do that and if you cant do these things you arent fully in control of your bike . But keep it up ..cycling is a wonderful way to get around
The instructor at the end told me I should just get out and cycle and that the busier the road the better as traffic goes slowly.


Umm...he's kind of got a point about the traffic but NO, that is absolutely not appropriate for a lesson to teach you to look behind / around you and develop situational awareness. Nowhere even close to correct protocol.


It's like saying "oh you've come to join the circus? Here's a whip, get in the lion cage!"


I'd be talking to the training provider. To teach looking behind and signalling you go to a quiet (ideally completely closed) road, start off cycling straight and doing "glances" left/right then making it more of a look until finally you can cycle along looking over your shoulder and using visual references to the sides to maintain straight and level direction. Same with signalling, you start on the same road gently releasing one hand then slowly developing until you can hold it out to one side while maintaining direction.


What he did was irresponsible at best.

Hope you're OK and it's not put you off too much.

Thanks to everyone for your responses.


I spoke to the training provider?s Ops Manager today and I felt I got the balance right between being enthusiastic and kind about the instructor and pointing out the lesson wasn?t pitched appropriately. I got a good response with all the right noises made about training and CPD for the instructor in question.


And I will keep cycling!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Every year they ask for more and every year it is an exhausting process pushing back on that for local residents and councillors. What annoys me is that at the post event consultation/ feedback this year, I specifically asked them if the rumours around applying for two weekends next year were true. They told me no. So that was a lie. Anyway, we go again. 
    • Double In New or great condition  Or super comfortable air bed Any1 pls
    • Rant ahead: You're not one of them but unfortunately, there's a substrate of posters here that do very little except moan and come up with weird conspiracy theories. They're immediately highly critical of just about any change, and their initial assumption is that everyone else is a total fucking contemptible idiot. For example: don't you think that the people who run the libraries will have considered the impact of timing of reconstruction on library users? (In fact, we know they have - because they've made arrangements at other libraries to attempt to mitigate the disruption). After all, these are the people that spend their whole working week thinking about libraries and dealing with library users (and the kids especially). You don't go into the library game for the chicks and fame - so it's fair to assume that librarians are committed to public service and public access to libraries, including by kids. Likewise the built environment people (engineers, architects, construction managers, project managers, construction contractors, subcontractors or whoever is on this job) are told to minimise disruption on every job they do. The thing that occurs to us as amateurs within 30 seconds of us seeing something is probably not something a full time professional hasn't thought about! Southwark Council, the NHS, TfL, Dulwich Estate, Thames Water, Openreach - they're not SPECTRE factories filled with malevolent chaosmongers trying to persecute anyone. They're mostly filled with people who understand their job and try to do their best with what they've been given - just like all of us. Nobody is perfect or immune from challenge, and that's fair enough, but why not at least start from the assumption that there's a good reason why things have been done the way they have? Any normal person would be pleased that their busy, pretty, lively local library is getting refurbished, and will have more space and facilities for kids and teens, and will be more efficient to run and warmer in winter. But no, EDT_Forumite_752 had kids who did an exam 20 years ago, and this makes them an expert on library refurbishment who can see it's all just stuff and nonsense for the green agenda and why can't it all be put off... 😡😡😡
    • I completely misread the previous post, sorry. For some reason I thought the mini cooper was also a police vehicle, DUH.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...