Jump to content

Recommended Posts

No. El Pibe, I was making a point that a scoreline isn't an indicator of a team's performance.


My analysis on yesterday's game, based on information available at the time, wasn't wrong at all. Even if the game did turn out to be tight I'll be still questioning my analysis.

"My analysis on yesterday's game, based on information available at the time, wasn't wrong at all"


By that token there simply is no such thing as a wrong prediction, considering that "information available at the time" by its very nature excludes the outcome.


There really isn't anyway of squirming out of this.

You made a prediction, it was incorrect.


Have you considered a career in politics?

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> You enjoy hurting your opponent with tackling? Are

> you Roy Keane?


Tackling is an important part of the game and so is psychology. The opposition respects you more by getting your tackles in early. I'm no Roy Keane but I never quite understood why some people refused to play on the same pitch as me.

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It can't actually be real, can it?

>

> Anyway UDT, surely the players had nothing to

> worry about, as you must get the ball every time.

> To get the man would be to make a mistake, and I

> just can't imagine you'd ever do that.


Absolutely, afaik, I've not permanently injured any player. Nor have I ever received a yellow and red card. And only once did my manager criticised my tackling because I showed my studs in a tackle.

You right, I never pick for football. Not play football. I pick for other sport. I pick for county sport. Actually pick to play to actual decent level. Not bang on about it, mind, like a cock, like it means something special. And not pick for pissy five-a-side, with pretend manager, joke coach and comedy scorelines.

I suggest you lot get some treatment for your childhood traumas people rather than taking out your anger on me.


Anyway, I'm off to do some shopping.


*waves bye bye*


ETA. Perhaps Dr Sigmund Huguenot, world famous psychologist, can help you lot. Quids recommends him too.

I openly admit I was never much good at football, and never cared. I don't think you need to play the game to understand it though UDT, it's really not all that complicated.


My school was a rugby school though, and I was a regular starter for the first XV, and played at a pretty good level in to my early 20s, until I couldn't be bothered anymore. I don't talk like I know better than anyone else about it though, because people tend to find that sort of thing really irritating.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Politician's moving from one party to another, especially when local is worth discussing. You have to wonder what they are driven by, and particularly in this instance, as their new party is moving in strange directions.
    • To be fair to Sue, she doesn't have to explain or justify why she supports or wants to vote for any party. That is the same for everyone. We are free to decide which party best reflects what we think is important to us. Discussing the stances/ policies of parties, in a general discussion, can be done without targetting anyone commenting here. Politics is just a point of view at the end of the day.  Different things are important to different people, often for very valid reasons. Let's be respectful of that.  My opinion is that if say the Labour Party wants to understand why it is losing supporters to the Greens, it needs to listen to and understand the reasons why. That theme has been explored in this thread a little through the discussion around councillor McAsh. The same is true of the Tories losing support to Reform and the Libdems. Let's not also assume that every member of every party is completely on board with every policy of the leadership of that party either. You only have to look at how backbenchers have forced u-turns from Starmer's cabinet on things like Welfare Reform and WFA to see that. 
    • As a compromise I'd be prepared to trial the reintroduction of dog licensing. The annual licence fee would be the same as road tax for Range Rover (same carbon emissions as a dog) and would require owners to pass a responsible dog ownership exam, the dogs would need to pass training and a behaviour exam and their DNA would need to be kept on record to identify the owners who leave dog shit all over the pavements, so that they can be jailed.  
    • Yeah  Ban people, that will solve all the planets environmental issues over night  Leave the dogs as they aren't the problem, its normally bad ownership and management that leads to badly behaved dogs. Spartacus  Ps Cat Rule 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...