Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Well these Idiots take the biscuit.

Not many dads below age 18. So they are looking at age range 18-45 that's 27 years. When men can be dad's up to 80-90 and 45 is just ridiculously low. Ignoring over half the possible candidates. Probably dreamt up by some 12 year old exec.

I reckon that what emc's not saying is that s/he's on the look-out for fitties: fabby daddies (is that what we're calling them?)


Also, assume s/he's taking into account the age of said glossy magazine's readership, so for instance an Easy Living reader might be happy ogling a dad in his 30s and 40s, whereas a dad in his 50s and 60s is more Saga fodder, and beyond that, we're really talking about People's Friend, and no one wants to go there. They don't photograph you, so much as call in a courtroom sketch artist.


Also I don't think you really count as a single dad when your progeny's a fully-formed adult themselves. Unless you're John Humphries, that rules out a lot of pensioners. Although Sean Connery, topless, with a baby / kitten - yeah, I'd probably have a gander.

RosieH Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

...we're really talking about People's Friend, and no one

> wants to go there. They don't photograph you, so

> much as call in a courtroom sketch artist.

>

....Although Sean Connery, topless, with a baby / kitten - yeah, I'd

> probably have a gander.



People's Friend centrefold July 2002...


http://26.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lri3wxOOux1qaxihzo1_500.jpg

as rosieh said the age cut off is due to the readership age of the magazine in question and of course we want lovely pics of the men with their little ish children, not their adult children ...There must be some single dads in east d as i seem to know an increasing number of single mums but i guess not many want to shout about it a magazine...

A ssssssshite for sssssssssshore eyes misssh moneypenny....




*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Here's a nice one of Sean and his missus. One for

> the album.

>

> http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/file.php?2

> 0,file=51518

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • No one is arguing that people should cycle without lights or reflectors. Obviously they should. It is also a legal requirement. But the colour of someone’s clothing? Is it ok to wear navy? What about green? What shade? At what point should we have ‘no reason for sympathy’ if they’re in a collision? How many tone variations in their clothing before it’s ok to claim they’re ‘invisible’?
    • Found it but cannot contact owner as no email or message on it. e*****@icloud.com   please let me know if you’ve recently lost an Apple Watch SE
    • What a passionate thread this is. I have worked in cycling for years, am a cyclist, a driver, use public transport etc. Driving last night with my two young kids, who also cycle, we made the same observations. It was the kids who first asked me why are most cyclists wearing full black and no lights. We then played a game who can spot all the cyclists, and count those with lights and those without. This teaches them to look out for them but also not to put themselves in a position where we have to strain to find them. 
    • On the plus side showers are warm down - for now 😆
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...