Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Well these Idiots take the biscuit.

Not many dads below age 18. So they are looking at age range 18-45 that's 27 years. When men can be dad's up to 80-90 and 45 is just ridiculously low. Ignoring over half the possible candidates. Probably dreamt up by some 12 year old exec.

I reckon that what emc's not saying is that s/he's on the look-out for fitties: fabby daddies (is that what we're calling them?)


Also, assume s/he's taking into account the age of said glossy magazine's readership, so for instance an Easy Living reader might be happy ogling a dad in his 30s and 40s, whereas a dad in his 50s and 60s is more Saga fodder, and beyond that, we're really talking about People's Friend, and no one wants to go there. They don't photograph you, so much as call in a courtroom sketch artist.


Also I don't think you really count as a single dad when your progeny's a fully-formed adult themselves. Unless you're John Humphries, that rules out a lot of pensioners. Although Sean Connery, topless, with a baby / kitten - yeah, I'd probably have a gander.

RosieH Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

...we're really talking about People's Friend, and no one

> wants to go there. They don't photograph you, so

> much as call in a courtroom sketch artist.

>

....Although Sean Connery, topless, with a baby / kitten - yeah, I'd

> probably have a gander.



People's Friend centrefold July 2002...


http://26.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lri3wxOOux1qaxihzo1_500.jpg

as rosieh said the age cut off is due to the readership age of the magazine in question and of course we want lovely pics of the men with their little ish children, not their adult children ...There must be some single dads in east d as i seem to know an increasing number of single mums but i guess not many want to shout about it a magazine...

A ssssssshite for sssssssssshore eyes misssh moneypenny....




*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Here's a nice one of Sean and his missus. One for

> the album.

>

> http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/file.php?2

> 0,file=51518

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The current wave of xenophobia is due to powerful/influential people stirring up hatred.  It;'s what happened in the past, think 1930s Germany.  It seems to be even easier now as so many get their information from social media, whether it is right or wrong.  The media seeking so called balance will bring some nutter on, they don't then bring a nutter on to counteract that. They now seem to turn to Reform at the first opportunity. So your life is 'shite', let;s blame someone else.  Whilst sounding a bit like a Tory, taking some ownership/personal responsibility would be a start.  There are some situations where that may be more challenging, in deindustrialised 'left behind' wasteland we can't all get on our bikes and find work.  But I loathe how it is now popular to blame those of us from relatively modest backgrounds, like me, who did see education and knowledge as a way to self improve. Now we are seen by some as smug liberals......  
    • Kwik Fit buggered up an A/C leak diagnosis for me (saying there wasn't one, when there was) and sold a regas. The vehicle had to be taken to an A/C specialist for condensor replacement and a further regas. Not impressed.
    • Yes, these are all good points. I agree with you, that division has led us down dangerous paths in the past. And I deplore any kind of racism (as I think you probably know).  But I feel that a lot of the current wave of xenophobia we're witnessing is actually more about a general malaise and discontent. I know non-white people around here who are surprisingly vocal about immigrants - legal or otherwise. I think this feeling transcends skin colour for a lot of people and isn't as simple as, say, the Jew hatred of the 1930s or the Irish and Black racism that we saw laterally. I think people feel ignored and looked down upon.  What you don't realise, Sephiroth, is that I actually agree with a lot of what you're saying. I just think that looking down on people because of their voting history and opinions is self-defeating. And that's where Labour's getting it wrong and Reform is reaping the rewards.   
    • @Sephiroth you made some interesting points on the economy, on the Lammy thread. Thought it worth broadening the discussion. Reeves (irrespective of her financial competence) clearly was too downbeat on things when Labour came into power. But could there have been more honesty on the liklihood of taxes going up (which they have done, and will do in any case due to the freezing of personal allowances).  It may have been a silly commitment not to do this, but were you damned if you do and damned if you don't?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...