Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Well these Idiots take the biscuit.

Not many dads below age 18. So they are looking at age range 18-45 that's 27 years. When men can be dad's up to 80-90 and 45 is just ridiculously low. Ignoring over half the possible candidates. Probably dreamt up by some 12 year old exec.

I reckon that what emc's not saying is that s/he's on the look-out for fitties: fabby daddies (is that what we're calling them?)


Also, assume s/he's taking into account the age of said glossy magazine's readership, so for instance an Easy Living reader might be happy ogling a dad in his 30s and 40s, whereas a dad in his 50s and 60s is more Saga fodder, and beyond that, we're really talking about People's Friend, and no one wants to go there. They don't photograph you, so much as call in a courtroom sketch artist.


Also I don't think you really count as a single dad when your progeny's a fully-formed adult themselves. Unless you're John Humphries, that rules out a lot of pensioners. Although Sean Connery, topless, with a baby / kitten - yeah, I'd probably have a gander.

RosieH Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

...we're really talking about People's Friend, and no one

> wants to go there. They don't photograph you, so

> much as call in a courtroom sketch artist.

>

....Although Sean Connery, topless, with a baby / kitten - yeah, I'd

> probably have a gander.



People's Friend centrefold July 2002...


http://26.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lri3wxOOux1qaxihzo1_500.jpg

as rosieh said the age cut off is due to the readership age of the magazine in question and of course we want lovely pics of the men with their little ish children, not their adult children ...There must be some single dads in east d as i seem to know an increasing number of single mums but i guess not many want to shout about it a magazine...

A ssssssshite for sssssssssshore eyes misssh moneypenny....




*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Here's a nice one of Sean and his missus. One for

> the album.

>

> http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/file.php?2

> 0,file=51518

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • End of a wonderful era. We’ve been going since it opened and even started contractions with my oldest (25 year old) son during a lovely New Year’s Eve lunch. Thank you Rod and Tim for some amazing memories. 
    • Update from SNJ following recent leaks https://www.specialneedsjungle.com/dfe-needs-plumber-better-policymakers-less-panic-truly-understands-send/
    • Let's not forget this is the lowest level of local politics. If McCash really thought his defection could trash the Labour Party nationally, and it was loaded with invective and exhibitionism, then that's pretty much the definition of a "hissy fit"! Scooping the Green nomination for DaWN constituency is also going to be a lot harder for a Marxist arriviste than you suggest. There may be a wave of new, younger Polanski-ites that have joined the Green Party of E&W recently, but it's the long-standing, often retired members of the Party that tend to participate in candidate interview panels and bother voting in selections...
    • They've had 26 years or so of trading, and if anyone deserves decent retirement... In my view they're going out at the top. It's clearly being sold, assuming it all goes through as a very more more than just a going concern. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...