Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Didn't read it but presume its same subject as the one they put through my letterbox about a meeting about schools. Taped to the side of bus stop southbound by Melbourne and on a tree outside Bells. Presume they're not the only 2
So you think anyone should just be able to stick any posters anywhere they want then? Brexit Party posters on every tree is all good yes? There are community notice boards for this type of thing. One a matter of yards from the illegally posted ones i saw today

The Elusive Shadow Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Didn't read it but presume its same subject as the

> one they put through my letterbox about a meeting

> about schools. Taped to the side of bus stop

> southbound by Melbourne and on a tree outside

> Bells. Presume they're not the only 2



So you don't actually know what the flyer is about or how many have been put at bus stops or trees.

Just be careful :)


Council threatens man with fine over lost cat posters

A council has been criticised for threatening to hand a ?1,000 fine to a pet owner who put up posters of his lost cat.


https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/howaboutthat/8237215/Council-threatens-man-with-fine-over-lost-cat-posters.html


Foxy

The Elusive Shadow Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> What makes them think its ok to stick their

> leaflets up in bus shelters? Also seen them pinned

> to trees. I'm sure the council will be fining them

> like they would if it was any other business?



As you later said that these leaflets were put through letterboxes, how do you know it was the Labour Party which put them on trees and in bus shelters?


It could have been anybody who wanted to publicise more widely what was in the leaflets.


I am going to a local Labour Party meeting tonight. I will make enquiries.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • So irrespective of the scandal how do you think that Rayner did as Housing Secretary?  
    • The Labour astro-turfers are out in force on this thread aren't they!
    • I don't really care about political sleaze in this  i am more concerned about thjle ability to run.a country without running it into the ground. Currently, labout seem to be heading straight towards the rocks, ignoring the warning blasts from the economic ighthouse. 
    • Which is exactly why Rayner had to go - don't be the sleaze attack dog and then not keep your own house in order - the really shocking fact is she didn't go the moment this came to light because she knew what advice, and the advice to seek proper tax expertise that was given to her in writing by the very people she was trying to throw under the bus - she clearly thought she might be able to spin her way out of it. When you look at the facts, the advice she was given and when and her behaviour in the last few days it has been scandalous and just shows the contempt for the public intelligence some politicians have. Interesting to see a very unscientific vox pop on BBC News last night but a lot of her own constituents seem to want rid of her as well and to be honest if you have to lose your cabinet role for this breach of the rules then you should probably lose your seat too. That is the hypocrisy here and why a lot of people don't like politicians because they're all the same.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...