Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Didn't read it but presume its same subject as the one they put through my letterbox about a meeting about schools. Taped to the side of bus stop southbound by Melbourne and on a tree outside Bells. Presume they're not the only 2
So you think anyone should just be able to stick any posters anywhere they want then? Brexit Party posters on every tree is all good yes? There are community notice boards for this type of thing. One a matter of yards from the illegally posted ones i saw today

The Elusive Shadow Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Didn't read it but presume its same subject as the

> one they put through my letterbox about a meeting

> about schools. Taped to the side of bus stop

> southbound by Melbourne and on a tree outside

> Bells. Presume they're not the only 2



So you don't actually know what the flyer is about or how many have been put at bus stops or trees.

Just be careful :)


Council threatens man with fine over lost cat posters

A council has been criticised for threatening to hand a ?1,000 fine to a pet owner who put up posters of his lost cat.


https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/howaboutthat/8237215/Council-threatens-man-with-fine-over-lost-cat-posters.html


Foxy

The Elusive Shadow Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> What makes them think its ok to stick their

> leaflets up in bus shelters? Also seen them pinned

> to trees. I'm sure the council will be fining them

> like they would if it was any other business?



As you later said that these leaflets were put through letterboxes, how do you know it was the Labour Party which put them on trees and in bus shelters?


It could have been anybody who wanted to publicise more widely what was in the leaflets.


I am going to a local Labour Party meeting tonight. I will make enquiries.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • “There was an excellent discussion on Newscast last night between the BBC Political Editor, the director of the IFS and the director of More In Common - all highly intelligent people with no party political agenda ” I would call this “generous”   Labour should never have made that tax promise because, as with - duh - Brexit, it’s pretending the real world doesn’t exist now. I blame Labour in no small part for this delusion. But the electorate need to cop on as well.  They think they can have everything they want without responsibilities, costs or attachments. The media encourage this  Labour do need to raise taxes. The country needs it.  Now, exactly how it’s done remains to be seen. But if people are just going to go around going “la la laffer curve. Liars! String em up! Vote someone else” then they just aren’t serious people reckoning with the problem yes Labour are more than a year into their term, but after 14 years of what the Tories  did? Whoever takes over, has a major problem 
    • Messaging, messaging, messaging. That's all it boils down to. There are only so many fiscal policies out there, and they're there for the taking, no matter which party you're in. I hate to say it, but Farage gets it right every time. Even when Reform reneges on fiscal policy, it does it with enough confidence and candidness that no one is wringing their hands. Instead, they're quietly admired for their pragmatism. Strangely, it's exactly the same as Labour has done, with its manifesto reverse on income tax, but it's going to bomb.  Blaming the Tories / Brexit / Covid / Putin ... none of it washes with the public anymore  - it wants to be sold a vision of the future, not reminded of the disasters of the past. Labour put itself on the back foot with its 'the tories fucked it all up' stance right at the beginning of its tenure.  All Lammy had to do (as with Reeves and Raynor etc) was say 'mea culpa. We've made a mistake, we'll fix it. Sorry guys, we're on it'. But instead it's 'nothing to see here / it's someone else's fault / I was buying a suit / hadn't been briefed yet'.  And, of course, the press smells blood, which never helps.  Oh! And Reeve's speech on Wednesday was so drab and predictable that even the journalists at the press conference couldn't really be arsed to come up with any challenging questions. 
    • Niko 07818 607 583 has been doing jobs for us for several years, he is reliable, always there for us, highly recommended! 
    • I am keeping my fingers crossed the next few days are not so loud. I honestly think it is the private, back garden displays that are most problematic as, in general, there is no way of knowing when and where they might happen. For those letting off a few bangers in the garden I get it is tempting to think what's the harm in a few minutes of 'fun', but it is the absolute randomness of sudden bangs that can do irreparable damage to people and animals. With organised events that are well advertised there is some forewarning at least, and the hope is that organisers of such events can be persuaded to adopt and make a virtue of using only low noise displays in future.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...