Calling Someone a Nazi

[saleem]

Have you ever called someone you're losing an argument to a Nazi (online or otherwise) because you or idealogy you claim allegiance to have been intellectually intimidated into a corner with no way out, other than irrelevant accusations to distract attention away from your immediate or impending defeat?

A user called Huguenot did exactly that to me in the Obama thread. Even though the Third Reich, Hitler or the Nazis couldn't be furthered removed from the discussion at hand. Seems like he had no other choice under the circumstances. Still, it's a cowardly and pathetic direction to take. Especially if it's unfounded. I feel sorry for anyone who has to resort to such irrelevant and/or unfounded accusation.

[Annette Curtain]

Booooooooringsville

Ken Livingston got away with it

Next ?

[Annette Curtain]

Look

This text is in the

middle

[saleem]

Livingstone shouldn't have allowed himself into giving that reporter the response he appeared to be looking for. Other than that, you're awkwardly unfunny.

[*Bob*]

Hello.. Again

[maxxi]

The goddamn horse is dead Steve.

I know you're upset and you can keep on hitting it all you like but it aint gonna bring it back.

[saleem]

Huh?

[Huguenot]

Oh well saleem, I wouldn't worry about it.

They'll judge me on the appropriateness of calling you 'Nazi boy', they'll only judge you on whether you think black people are genetic spongers.

You'll win, I'm sure.

[saleem]

Who said anything about genetics? Or are you just running further distraction?

[Huguenot]

Quite right saleem, because where you said...

"African American [traditional attitudes were] overridden by the opportunity to get more for less (at the expense of hard-working Americans, regardless of colour or creed)"

Wasn't a comment on genetics at all?

Or is African American not a genetic observation?

I've possibly made a terrible terrible mistake there, and what you meant was something completely different of no genetic origin?

[saleem]

Huguenot, can this guy be accused of being a Nazi on account of the views he expresses?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RdxQbBk4huA&list=UU1g1imYIlcjt47kuHjlBzZA&index=4&feature=plcp

[Huguenot]

Yes saleem sugarplum, because that's exactly what I'm doing here is it?

You think that highlighting that your bullshit claim about black people being welfare scroungers is invented is somehow patronising the black community and making them victims?

What would you like to make up next?

Can we consider a rebuttal of any other monumental bullshit to be patronsing?

I reckon that you're an inspired social commentator, but I'm sure that you wouldn't describe anyone who defended you from that unreasonable baseless insult to be patronising, no?

[saleem]

Son, you levelled irrelevant, unfounded accusations of me being a Nazi because you couldn't defend the ideals you hold dear against my critique. Also, I noticed you dodged answering my question re. the YT video. Seriously, could you fail any harder than you are now?

[Huguenot]

Ah, okay son.

It may be that you haven't watched the video. The chap was making a point about engineered victimisation.

I didn't think that lying about blacks being welfare scroungers fell into that bracket. I thought that fell into general purpose racially motivated abuse.

My mistake.

[Otta]

"Son"?

Are you actually an American drill sergeant?

[saleem]

Yes, engineered by liberals. But do his opinions make him a Nazi?

[saleem]

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> "Son"?

>

> Are you actually an American drill sergeant?

No. Are you actually trying to be funny?

[Salsaboy]

I blame the French.

[saleem]

It's hardly fair to lay the blame for Huguenot's cowardice on France's doorstep. Otherwise we'd have to pursue them for his dishonesty, too.

[Huguenot]

Start a new thread son.

[saleem]

Grammatical fail. If you were addressing me, "thread" would've immediately been followed by a comma, dummy.

[Huguenot]

Effort to change subject sounds like ping pong ball in tin bucket shock.

[saleem]

That's a rather hypocritical claim to make for someone who chose to resort to immature circle-jerking after it dawned on them that they couldn't refute uncomfortable truths by any means other than running petty distraction. Typical of your average liberal entitlement case. I bet you camped-out in front of St. Paul's in solidarity with all the other Occupy cretins.

[giggirl]

Hello Saleem,

Subjecting an entire post code to these outpourings is not the way to go. Seriously. Some people have suggested it's boring. They're wrong. It's car crash.

Please try and find a possibility for yourself that you're living a life that impacts others in a positive way and that fulfills you. This thing that you're doing is not big, or clever, it's screaming empty. Stop it. Hugenot has upset you. Fine. I get it. Try and be bigger than your enemies, not smaller.

GG

[Mick Mac]

I didn't expect much from this thread.

But I got a lot less than I expected.