Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I have never asked for, or considered the square footage when buying a house. I usually look round it several times and make an assessment of whether I like it or not. I've been using nothing more than a visual assessment of it's adequacy in terms of size. Am I insane? Has anyone got an equation which I can use to produce a desirability index of the local area and character ratio concerning the style? Blimey, I've not been looking at any of this objectively enough. Clearly, I am not cut out to occupy my own investment vehicle.
That Nutfield Rd. house looks really small. Perhaps the ones on the shops side are smaller. Usually they had kitchen before bathroom, so you could knock it through to make a big kitchen, and then put bathroom upstairs. Then you would have two rooms at the front, usually divided by a wall. Can also put extension on top, and possibly at the back and then add extra bedroom on top of extension.

Exactly, people like being near good schools, close to transport, near green spaces and to live on quiet tidy roads. How many streets have these properties in an area will determine if this is an extra that people pay a premium for or if its common and part of the avg price psm. Most individuals don't do any calculation but its common sense and so is automatically reflected in the sales prices.


The issue is with agents who mislead buyers into thinking there 900 sqf 3 bed is worth as much as the property next door which is 50 percent bigger. These properties sit on the market forever until the sellers finally reset their expectations. Even if someone thought about overpaying the mortgage surveyors would knock it back these days so the agents are just wasting everyone's time.



Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> rahrahrah, I think a lot of people would agree

> with you. The total area is important, but so is

> the layout.

Sfootage is your automatic starting point, enabling comp of different roads. Obviously you then apply common sense and add for terraces, gardens, great condition etc and subtract for any work you will have to do.


Incidentally most agents here price off sfootage, as can be seen by the round numbers.


Continental agents price off a mixture of sfootage and cubic footage for old houses. This would take account of the fact that a first floor flat in a four storey Georgian building will have wonderful ceilings and a sense of space. I find that using sfootage and adjusting for positive factors/floors works just as well.


I am finding nervousness creeping into what had been an over hyped market in my view. Or maybe the summer has been too busy for the normal buying activity. How are you finding it, if anyone reading this is also trying to buy?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and  particularly with the state of 'Smoke Control' law and practice generally?  I've just been looking  through some of it for the first time and, afaics, the civil penalties mentioned  were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022.  So it seems that, in this particular,  it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation.  I'm not criticising that at all, but am curious.  
    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...