Jump to content

Recommended Posts

TFL have refused to renew Ubers licence to operate as a taxi company in London, subject to appeal by Uber.


Two questions


Do you agree with the decision by TFL?


And will this also effect Uber delivery services (I.e. Uber eats)?


Would be interested to hear views from all sides (Uber drivers, taxi drivers and passengers )


Could make getting home from the office party interesting this year.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/242816-uber-licence/
Share on other sites

Uber only has 21 days to lodge and appeal and whilst Uber is going to appeal against the tfl decision, a magistrate will have to decide whether Uber is fit to hold a licence in London, or not.


A decision from a magistrates court could take weeks or months and unless the court decides otherwise, Uber will retain its licence during this period too.


So if they appeal immediately and the case is quick, it could well all be over by Christmas (lol that famous old quote)


Personally I find their service of late disappointing and the number of times my booked ride cancels (driver gets a better fare) and the app has to search again is getting worse in central London.

They are currently not fit for purpose. This is the second suspension and despite a change of CEO and a massive advertising campaign they are still allowing dodgy practices and not ensuring full safety for customers. It's right that TfL are pursuing this and they shoukd be supported.

cella Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> They are currently not fit for purpose. This is

> the second suspension and despite a change of CEO

> and a massive advertising campaign they are still

> allowing dodgy practices and not ensuring full

> safety for customers. It's right that TfL are

> pursuing this and they shoukd be supported.



I agree.

Uber very safe imo. You actually know who's car you're getting in to, have a digital trail for the entire journey, full tracking and the rest.


I don't like them taking 20% off the drivers though.


No reason drivers themselves couldn't create a co-op taxi app and keep almost the entire fare. Taxi app should be pretty simple. It's the regulatory stuff that's bit more complicated.


I see getting in to some random black can as far more risky.

mrwb Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Uber very safe imo. You actually know who's car

> you're getting in to, have a digital trail for the

> entire journey, full tracking and the rest.

>

> I don't like them taking 20% off the drivers

> though.

>

> No reason drivers themselves couldn't create a

> co-op taxi app and keep almost the entire fare.

> Taxi app should be pretty simple. It's the

> regulatory stuff that's bit more complicated.

>

> I see getting in to some random black can as far

> more risky.


Yes well opinions are no substitute for understanding...

mrwb Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Uber very safe imo. You actually know who's car

> you're getting in to, have a digital trail for the

> entire journey, full tracking and the rest.

>



But from what I've read, you don't, in fact.


Many of Uber's drivers are apparently uninsured, and also some drivers are using another driver's ID, if I have understood things correctly.


So you may know whose car you are getting into, but not necessarily who is driving it, nor whether they are insured.

I don't like black cabs. Too many "don't go south of the river, mate" experiences and times being trapped listening to some fairly obnoxious and uninvited opinions on the issues of the day whilst stuck in the back. As a cyclist, I am also fed up of being treated as game to be hunted by some cab drivers. They're ridiculously expensive and have a total monopoly and of course, successive mayors have been in hock to them as they have huge lobbying power. Whilst I accept that the 'knowledge' is a high skill qualification, it is also completely redundant in these days of Waze etc. I personally welcome the break up of their cartel.

Clearly any insurance issues or other malpractice need to be resolved. As to the rest, I can only go on personal and practical experience.


Virtually I and all of my friends use Uber, which translates to thousands of journeys since it started. The worst any of us can say about them are occasional cancelled rides (leading to another, say, 3 minute wait) or a surge fare from time to time.


Never had any issue with any driver. Cars are 95% decent.


If you feel the drivers are underpaid, tip them. I do. The driver keeps 100% of the tips.

rahrahrah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> They amount of pollution they cause while driving

> around looking for fares, is also unwelcome.


You'll find that black cabs are more polluting, they are a very powerful lobby and are allowed to stay on our roads than other commercial vehicles. The switch to plug in hybrids will take a long time

It might be quicker than you think in terms of the black cabs converting over


https://www.driving.co.uk/news/cabbies-hail-new-electric-taxi-call-government-help-drivers-switch-diesel/


I also thought that in a few years time only electric black cabs would get new first time licence (according to a cabby a couple of months ago) when the cab is first registered for use on Londons streets

malumbu Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> rahrahrah Wrote:

> -------------------------------------------------

> The switch to plug in hybrids will take a long

> time


Driverless vehicles aren't far away (Uber's business plan includes these) so is it worth it ?


In testing but probably 5 years below.


https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2019/oct/03/driverless-cars-in-new-london-trial-in-complex-urban-environment

For me an "Uber" like system is the way forward for all Taxis.


No reason it has to actually be run by the Uber corporation though. Personally think we're decades away from driver-less cars in a city as complicated to navigate as London. Too many unexpected things happen on the roads for computer driven car to be safe anytime before that.


The Uber app itself is really very simple. Don't see why TFL or the drivers themselves if they joined forces couldn't simply copy what Uber are doing right now with a better App. Give all the money ex expenses to the drivers?


All the drivers use Google Maps / Waze to navigate anyway.

malumbu Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> rahrahrah Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > They amount of pollution they cause while

> driving

> > around looking for fares, is also unwelcome.

>

> You'll find that black cabs are more polluting,

> they are a very powerful lobby and are allowed to

> stay on our roads than other commercial vehicles.

> The switch to plug in hybrids will take a long

> time


I was referring to black cabs - sorry, it wasn't clear. I'm in favour of breaking up the black cabs cartel

mrwb Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> For me an "Uber" like system is the way forward

> for all Taxis.

>

> No reason it has to actually be run by the Uber

> corporation though. Personally think we're decades

> away from driver-less cars in a city as

> complicated to navigate as London. Too many

> unexpected things happen on the roads for computer

> driven car to be safe anytime before that.

>

> The Uber app itself is really very simple. Don't

> see why TFL or the drivers themselves if they

> joined forces couldn't simply copy what Uber are

> doing right now with a better App. Give all the

> money ex expenses to the drivers?

>

> All the drivers use Google Maps / Waze to navigate

> anyway.


exactly this. I'm not necessarily lobbying for Uber, but I do think the whole business model of thousands of diesel cars driving round looking for fares, with highly paid drivers who've spent years memorising every street in London is a ridiculous anachronism. The black cab monopoly is ripe for challenge.

Black cabs are available on 'Gett' - which works in a similar way to Uber.


Last cab journey I took with Uber cost ?22 on Saturday night. Comparative black cab price for that journey at the same time would be ?42. Maybe the former is too little (hence 'it's good to tip') but the latter is absolutely too much, unless there happen to be five of you travelling.

Lemming, I've had different experience with pricing


Late night saturday(s) coming back from Soho , uber quotes and charges almost exactly the same as a black cab (surge pricing) and also proved more difficult to get as they cancel after accepting.


I've started to use black cabs more now as a result. Plus they always seem to have an interesting conversation starter 😂

TheArtfulDogger Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Late night saturday(s) coming back from Soho ,

> uber quotes and charges almost exactly the same as

> a black cab (surge pricing) and also proved more

> difficult to get as they cancel after accepting.


The menace of The Surge! Well, supply and demand in action there: the surge can be double at absolute peak time and place, no doubt. Good excuse to head back into the pub for another drink then try again.


In small defence of The Surge - it is I think transparently explained by Uber, seems to be geographically localised quite precisely - and can disappear as quickly as it arrives.

rahrahrah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I don't like black cabs. Too many "don't go south

> of the river, mate" experiences and times being

> trapped listening to some fairly obnoxious and

> uninvited opinions on the issues of the day whilst

> stuck in the back. As a cyclist, I am also fed up

> of being treated as game to be hunted by some cab

> drivers. They're ridiculously expensive and have a

> total monopoly and of course, successive mayors

> have been in hock to them as they have huge

> lobbying power. Whilst I accept that the

> 'knowledge' is a high skill qualification, it is

> also completely redundant in these days of Waze

> etc. I personally welcome the break up of their

> cartel.


I haven't used a black cab since at gone midnight stood in pouring rain in Islington 3 black cabs with their lights on stopped and refused to take me because I was going to SE london.

as a middle aged lone female I felt pretty vulnerable too.

I always use Uber now I've used them in france and the US too.

the drivers are always polite and intelligent and I feel safe

and more importantly I don't feel I'm being charged a fortune to go door to door.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hi - I posted a request for some help with a stuck door and possible leaky roof. I had responses from Lukasz at Look_as.com and Pawel at Sublime Builders. I don't see any/many reviews - has anyone used either person?  Could use a recommendation rather then just being contact by the tradespeople... Many Thanks 
    • I'm a bit worried by your sudden involvement on this Forum.  The former Prince Andrew is now Andrew Mountbatten Windsor Mountbatten in an anglicisation of Von Battenburg adopted by that branch of our Royal Family in 1917 due to anti-German sentiment. Another anglicisation could be simply Battenburg as in the checker board cake.  So I surmise that your are Andrew Battenburg, aka Andrew Mountbatten Windsor and that you have infiltrated social media so that the country can put the emphasis on Mandelson rather than yourself.  Bit of a failure. I don't expect an answer from police custody.  
    • We had John fit our PLYKEA kitchen (IKEA cabinets with custom doors) and would happily recommend him and Gabi to anyone. Gabi handled all communication and was brilliant throughout — responsive and happy to answer questions however detailed. John is meticulous, cares about the small details, and was a pleasure to have in the house. The carpentry required for the custom doors was done to a high standard, and he even refinished the plumbing under the sink to sit better with the new cabinets — a small touch that made a real difference. They were happy to return and tie up a few things that couldn't be finished in the time, which we appreciated. No hesitations recommending them.
    • Not sure about that. Rockets seems to have (rightly in my view) identified two key motivating elements in Mcash's defection: anger at his previous (arguably shabby) treatment and a (linked) desire to trash the Labour party, nationally and locally. The defection, timed for maximum damage, combined with the invective and moral exhibitionism of his statement counts as rather more than a "hissy fit".  I would add a third motivation of political ambition: it's not inconceivable that he has his eye on the Dulwich & West Norwood seat which is predicted to go Green.  James Barber was indulging in typical LibDem sleight of hand, claiming that Blair introduced austerity to *councils* before the coalition. This is a kind of sixth form debating point. From 1997-1999 Labour broadly stuck to Tory spending totals, meaning there was limited growth in departmental spending, including local govt grants. However local government funding rose substantially in the Noughties, especially in education and social care. It is a matter of record that real-terms local authority spending increased in the Blair / Brown years overall. So he's manifestly wrong (or only right if the focus is on 1997-1999, which would be a bizarre focus and one he didn't include in his claim) but he wasn't claiming Blair introduced austerity more widely. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...