Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Administrator

Because the person who has a vendetta against the school posted another message after I requested they didn't.


I said that if they did then I would remove the thread. They did and so I did.


Apologies for that and I have requested that the school replies to posts in future to set the record straight.

I don't understand why one presumably spurious post has meant that the whole thread has been removed .


The school hasn't posted on here before ( or am I mistaken ? ) , I've always felt that the absence of their comments was deliberate .

Possibly not wanting to prolong any possibly damaging debate .


Is it likely that they will respond to Admin's request ?

If it's known that the poster in question is posting malicious comments ,is it not possible to block the posts ?


I don't understand these things but I've seen posters on here referring to bans ,or being banished to a part of the Forum .

  • Administrator

Unfortunately the original post was by the person in question and so I can't keep a thread up if I remove the original messages. The poster has been banned and came back with other IDs.


Tell you what, I'll ressurect it and edit/remove the posts, you can read it here:

http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?5,913767,914881#msg-914881


Doesn't make much sense though!


Added: The comments may not made by just one person with multiple account who has a vendetta against the school. There may be an individual who also posted a message which was deleted.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Having enjoyed a day with Sayce HolmesLewis, I understand what you’re saying.  I appreciate your courage responding on here. 
    • Thank you to everyone who has already shared their thoughts on this. Dawson Heights Estate in the 1980s, while not as infamous as some other estates, did have its share of anti-social behaviour and petty crime. My brother often used the estate as a shortcut when coming home from his girlfriend’s house, despite my parents warning him many times to avoid it. Policing during that era had a distinctly “tough on crime” approach. Teenagers, particularly those from working-class areas or minority communities, were routinely stopped, questioned, and in some cases, physically handled for minor infractions like loitering, skateboarding, or underage drinking. Respect for authority wasn’t just expected—it was demanded. Talking back to a police officer could escalate a situation very quickly, often with harsh consequences. This was a very different time. There were no body cameras, dash cams, or social media to hold anyone accountable or to provide a record of encounters. Policing was far more physical and immediate, with few technological safeguards to check officer behaviour. My brother wasn’t known to the police. He held a full-time job at the Army and Navy store in Lewisham and had recently been accepted into the army. Yet, on that night, he ran—not because he was guilty of anything—but because he knew exactly what would happen if he were caught on an estate late at night with a group of other boys. He was scared, and rightfully so.
    • I'm sure many people would look to see if someone needed help, and if so would do something about it, and at least phone the police if necessary if they didn't feel confident helping directly. At least I hope so. I'm sorry you don't feel safe, but surely ED isn't any less safe than most places. It's hardly a hotbed of crime, it's just that people don't post on here if nothing has happened! And before that, there were no highwaymen,  or any murders at all .... In what way exactly have we become "a soft apologetic society", whatever that means?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...