Jump to content

Big bundle of items (Different ages)


Tenequa

Recommended Posts

Ralph Lauren pink polo top size 4 and white Ralph Lauren shirt size 3-?25


White nike airmax trainers size 8.5 infant-?10


Green huaraches infant size 8.5-?10


Black and white vans infant size 7.5-?10


Grey and white nike airforce infant size 7.5-?5


2 bags full of ball pit balls (atleast 200)-?5


Train play pretend phone-?5


Play mat alphabet-?5


M and s girls school shoes size 9-?5


Black baby bag(never used)-?5


Pink party dress(never worn)size 6-12 months-?10


Cream fur coat size 9-13 months- ?5


Black puffa jacket size 9-12 months ?10


Red white white polka dots jacket size 12-18-?5


Red and silver dress, white and pink off the shoulder top, a pair of jeans and jean jacket sizes 2-3-?10


Pink and white short sleeve dress and hot pink frills dress size 24-36months??5


Grey and black leopard jumper and grey and white star dressing gown size 4-5years-?5


Black and cream party dress, pink princess t shirt, grey long sleeve sparkle top, navy dress, blue star dress, awesome sister T-shirt, grey long sleeve top, pink jacket with fur leopard lining, short sleeve blue and pink tops x2, pink long sleeve top, make today beautiful long sleeve jumper, flower jumper, pink bears dressing gown, pink flower dress, lilac puffa jacket, flower long sleeve jumper sizes 3-4years-?25


All needs gone asap as having a clear out and it?s in the way of Christmas tree.


Thank you

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • I believe around 57% of the 5,538 people who were part of the self selecting sample making up the original consultation, opposed the LTN. So just over 3,000 people. This was around 3 years ago now. I think there’s something like 40,000+ living across se22 and SE21 🤷‍♂️  The LTN is a minority interest at best. Whilst it’s an obsession for a small number on the transport thread who strongly oppose it, I suspect most locals quietly approve of the improvements made to that junction. …and we still haven’t heard who has supposedly been pressurising the emergency services and how (are we seriously going with the far left / the commies)? Is anyone willing to stand up and support the 'One' claim that people are partially covering their plates and driving through the filters due to inadequate signage? Again, it all sounds a little ridiculous / desperate. Feels like it may be time for them to start coming to terms with the changes.
    • Okay Earl, of those 'consulted' how many voices were in favour of the junction and how many against? Were there more responses in favour or more against? This local junction change is being driven by Southwark Labour Councillors- not as you assert by Central Govt. Also, if consultations are so irrelevant as indicators of meaningful local support in the way you seem to imply, why do organisations like Southwark Cyclists constantly ask their members to respond to all and any consultation on LTN's and CPZ's?  
    • You could apply the same argument to any kind of penalty as an effective deterrent.  Better than doing nothing. 
    • Check the link I provided above. It gives a very full account of where the push for LTNs came from, (in brief, central government). The consultation did not show that the majority of local residents were against the LTN. Not for the first time, you’ve confused a ‘consultation’ with a ‘referendum’. The outcome of local elections (which many opposed to LTNs excitedly promoted as a referendum on the scheme at the time…until they lost), suggests they are actually quite popular. All the polling on LTNs generally, also shows strong majority support across London.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...