Jump to content

Travelling to hospital during labour

Lottie87

By Lottie87
in The Family Room Discussion

 Share

Recommended Posts

Lottie87

Lottie87

Posted
Posted

Right, I'm in a bit of difficult situation and I hope someone might be able to give me some advice.


I'm 6 months pregnant, and have just had to move temporarily back to my parents house (with my partner, two cats and all our belongings) because of a complete **** up regarding what was supposed to be our new rented home.


The problem is, my parents' house is in Sutton, and the local hospital is St Helier, statistically one of the worst in England (particularly for antenatal care). All of my appointments are still with Kings, and I will be moving back to the area, but it is looking very unlikely that this will be before the baby is born (partly because I can't cope with another move after doing it twice in one week).


What I want to know is...are you allowed to stay with King's for appointments if you're no longer in the catchment area? Also, how feasible is it to drive 25 minutes to hospital in labour? The answers might seem obvious but it's my first baby and stress has fried my brain these last couple of weeks.


Also, if anyone has anything good to say about St Helier, please pipe up and make me feel better. I felt really reassured by Kings, had heard only good things about it, and now I'm getting a bit nervous.


Ta! Lx

Cora

Cora

Posted
Posted
Think you can stay with kings as it is a foundation hospital which I think means it doesn't serve on catchment area - my understanding is that you can stay with them even if you move. Also you can travel to the hospital, depending on how quickly your labour is progressing but quite stressful to know you have a journey ahead....Is there a friend you could travel up to the moment your labour starts so that you are nearer by for when you are far enough gone to be admitted?
KateW

KateW

Posted
Posted
We don't live in ED anymore (I can't give up the forum though!) and had a 20 minute drive to hospital from where we lived in Cambridge. The majority of first labours (I think) are reasonably long and I wasn't worried at all that we wouldn't make it in time (when we arrived at hospital, I was about 3 centimetres, and gave birth about 10 hours later - so a fairly short labour I guess for a first baby). I'd say 25 mins was totally do-able, although a tens machine might help make the journey a bit more bearable. One thing to bear in mind though is if you have to go back and forth to the hospital a few times; I had to go in to hospital the day before as my waters had broken (I didn't know they had so they wanted to examine me to check) then they sent me home as I didn't want to wait around in hospital any longer than I needed to, to wait to go into labour (or to come back for an induction). So, it might be worth you having a back-up plan if you have to go into hospital in the early stages of labour but they they send you home; do you have a friend near to Kings whose place you could stay at for a few hours/a day if they send you home?
Princess

Princess

Posted
Posted

I had both my babies at Kings. The second one was born just as we sold our house. As a result, we put everything into storage for 6 weeks and rented an extortionately expensive short term let flat before we could move into our new home. We eventually moved in when our son was two weeks old. I understand how you feel!


We now live over in Raynes Park and whilst my children weren't born here, my baby was very poorly just after we moved in. We have spent a lot of time at St Helier over the past year. I have to say I could not fault them at all and whilst the building looks dodgy the care we have has has been superb.


I believe talking to other mum friends over here you can choose to go to Kingston or St George's as altwrnatives if you wish. Both of which are much closer than Kings. For me, I labour very quickly if I ever do it again, based on my experiences this far, I would be happy to go to St Helier.

dulwichgirl2

dulwichgirl2

Posted
Posted

For what it's worth, I don't think 25 mins is long at all. It could take that amount of time in london if you got stuck in traffic.


Sorry to hear of all the moving etc. stress. The arrival of your first baby should be the best experience of your life so try to enjoy the next few months (and make the most of not having to pay bbsitters or, in my case, feeling physically attached to my first baby long long after the birth. Don't make that mistake!)

Smiler

Smiler

Posted
Posted

I had my second baby at st helier in august 2010 (antenatal care in ED, moved just before the birth) and found the care (for the birth and postnatal) much better than at kings. The statistics are about strange things when you look into them. St helier have a lovely, midwife-led birthing suite that's round the corridor from the labour ward / theatres, the midwives / doctors were open-minded, eg they said I could go in the birthing suite for a VBAC, it was quieter than kings. Think They have around the same number of staffed birthing rooms but only around half the number of births.


I was in for a week in total. I had really wanted to stay with kings, but was concerned about being stuck in traffic when in labour, journeys to and from hospital before/after the birth for my partner etc. it ended up being fine, indeed better.


They directly employ their cleaners, hospitality staff etc rather than contracting out. the healthcare assistants were excellent. And you can pay for a private room, which was expensive but fantastic!


Obviously this is just one experience! But it might be worth having a look around st helier and asking qs etc.


Special care for babies is there too, although not as specialist as kings. My daughter needed a few hours in there and some monitoring and was well cared for.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
  • Advertise Here

  • Latest Discussions

    • camberwell57
      Checking refs of these builders

      By camberwell57 · Posted

      Hi - I posted a request for some help with a stuck door and possible leaky roof. I had responses from Lukasz at Look_as.com and Pawel at Sublime Builders. I don't see any/many reviews - has anyone used either person?  Could use a recommendation rather then just being contact by the tradespeople... Many Thanks 
    • malumbu
      Will Mandelson be accepted across the pond.

      By malumbu · Posted

      I'm a bit worried by your sudden involvement on this Forum.  The former Prince Andrew is now Andrew Mountbatten Windsor Mountbatten in an anglicisation of Von Battenburg adopted by that branch of our Royal Family in 1917 due to anti-German sentiment. Another anglicisation could be simply Battenburg as in the checker board cake.  So I surmise that your are Andrew Battenburg, aka Andrew Mountbatten Windsor and that you have infiltrated social media so that the country can put the emphasis on Mandelson ather than yourself.  Bit of a failure. I don't expect an answer from police custody.  
    • enya
      John Marx (Top Marx Kitchens): highly recommended kitchen fitter

      By enya · Posted

      We had John fit our PLYKEA kitchen (IKEA cabinets with custom doors) and would happily recommend him and Gabi to anyone. Gabi handled all communication and was brilliant throughout — responsive and happy to answer questions however detailed. John is meticulous, cares about the small details, and was a pleasure to have in the house. The carpentry required for the custom doors was done to a high standard, and he even refinished the plumbing under the sink to sit better with the new cabinets — a small touch that made a real difference. They were happy to return and tie up a few things that couldn't be finished in the time, which we appreciated. No hesitations recommending them.
    • Suggsy
      Councillor McAsh defects to the Greens

      By Suggsy · Posted

      Not sure about that. Rockets seems to have (rightly in my view) identified two key motivating elements in Mcash's defection: anger at his previous (arguably shabby) treatment and a (linked) desire to trash the Labour party, nationally and locally. The defection, timed for maximum damage, combined with the invective and moral exhibitionism of his statement counts as rather more than a "hissy fit".  I would add a third motivation of political ambition: it's not inconceivable that he has his eye on the Dulwich & West Norwood seat which is predicted to go Green.  James Barber was indulging in typical LibDem sleight of hand, claiming that Blair introduced austerity to *councils* before the coalition. This is a kind of sixth form debating point. From 1997-1999 Labour broadly stuck to Tory spending totals, meaning there was limited growth in departmental spending, including local govt grants. However local government funding rose substantially in the Noughties, especially in education and social care. It is a matter of record that real-terms local authority spending increased in the Blair / Brown years overall. So he's manifestly wrong (or only right if the focus is on 1997-1999, which would be a bizarre focus and one he didn't include in his claim) but he wasn't claiming Blair introduced austerity more widely. 

East Dulwich Forum

Established in 2006, we are an online community discussion forum for people who live, work in and visit SE22.

Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...