Jump to content

Recommended Posts

1988 ... 100 metres men's final.


For me it's the greatest athletic event ever for sheer raw excitement.


Do I care if some of the participants were subsequently found to be on drugs. I'm not sure I do care. It does not reduce the excitement I felt at the time.


The greatest 10 seconds in sport, ever.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/24570-the-greatest-ever-race/
Share on other sites

"As one athlete put it, it was "cheat or get beat"."


..or as it turned out, get beat or drop dead before your time.


I think the last time I got excited about athletics was probably Daley's defence of his title in 1984.

I don't know if maybe the kempston/rubber key destroying game on the speccy might have been responsible for that.


1936 was probably before my time. My dad was about then but being bombed by Franco so had slightly more pressing concerns.

The best races for me were the mid-80's middle distance battles between (mainly) the UK athletes, Cram, Coe, Ovett and to an extent Peter Elliot. I'm talking 800m and 1500m. I think it was in summer 1985 Cram broke something like 5x World records in 6 weeks.

The period I mention includes the '84 and '88 Olympics, in which although I cannot remember the specifics, the heats and finals were top drawer if you like that distance.

I think during this period Carloz Lopez regained the World AAA Cross Country World title over (I think) 10,000m, he was 39 if I remember correctly.

Back in the day when I worked on The Sporting Life I remember getting paid on a Thursday but had pissed it all up the wall by Saturday but I got a tip on a horse at 66-1. It was a dead cert. I'd heard all that before but I borrowed two quid off a colleague who was also backing it and told me to get on it, so I duly put the money down. The horse won. I can't remember the name of the horse or the race as it was such a long time ago (late 70s) but my winnings were equivalent to more than two weeks wages back then. Now as far as I'm concerned that was the greatest race ever.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • But at the same time those she sought for advice told her, very clearly, she needed to seek specialist advice which she did not do and carried on regardless. So I think the jury is out on whether this was a legitimate mistake or not.
    • Thanks @Sephiroth I was thinking along the same lines (demonisation of Rayner by the media) and came across this article yesterday from Manchester Evening News.  It doesn't excuse her, but the title "Angela Rayner's real offence was being a working class woman in power" is self explanatory. https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/angela-rayners-real-offence-being-32422596 The crossing legs nonsense is particularly telling.
    • Given her role, she pretty much had to go. I don't think she is an avid tax-schemer who deliberately set out to avoid tax - I do pretty much believe her story of multiple high-profile roles and looking after a child with needs. But many regular voters juggle demanding jobs and families and are afforded no leeway by taxman, so she totally should have known better But here we are - she was found to be negligent and now she has suffered teh consequence. To me that its the OPPOSITE of all parties/politicians as generally the ignore the whole thing (today we have Tice saying Farage's tax affairs are of no interest to voters for example) And it would be poor form to not acknowledge why she was targeted quite so viciously - we even have posters on here here saying "when I saw her taping on a boat that was the  end for me" - like the end of what?. Her gender and class were clear motivators for many people. Two wrongs don't make a right - but it';s interesting to see some posters on here give so many others a blank cheque. Many are planning to vote for Farage despite his dishonesty being 100x worse than Rayner PS - I don't think she will join Corbyn party - unlike him she is smart and unlike him she recognises that being In power means you can at least stand a chance of delivering results This. The Greens will have a rise in the polls on back of new leader but that is one hell of a coalition of NIMBY/YIMBYs As what would Reform do if in government to help with... well, anything?   Labour can at least point to decreasing waiting lists, lower immigration numbers, not having a different PM every 6 months - not that anyone is listening
    • So what do people want?  More housing.  More affordable housing.  But not in my back yard. That applies to urban areas too.  Easy to criticise, but where are your answers?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...