Jump to content

Recommended Posts

My understanding is GE still want to proceed with (request for) using outside courtyard smoking space for drinking/serving drinks ?

This will create noise for those living close by whereas that space I believe was never previously used.

Lets all go together !


NO NO NO WE DONT WANT LATE DRINKING


NO NO NO OUR CHILDREN NEED THEIR SLEEP


NO NO NO PUBS TO CLOSE AT 11pm


Come on everyone, lets stand as one, ED is amazing, we want baby clubs and dog poo bins instead


ED is like, sooooooo amazing!


I think we should all hold hands

I thought people in ED were meant to be friendly and happy and clap and sing and play connect 4 in their local pub surrounded by children?


CLEARLY you don?t belong in ED with such a horribly rude attitude.


But I forgive you. In my heart, we?re friends (but not lovers).

EDforME Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I thought people in ED were meant to be friendly

> and happy and clap and sing and play connect 4 in

> their local pub surrounded by children?

>

> CLEARLY you don?t belong in ED with such a

> horribly rude attitude.

>

> But I forgive you. In my heart, we?re friends (but

> not lovers).


Now where have I seen similar posts... are yes.. longboy..


Any relation to you.


Fox.

I hammer Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I was wondering now that we have 2 good pubs on

> Crystal Palace road, if anyone thinks there'll be

> a knock on effect with less people on the Lane? I

> think the TGE is excellent, that seems to cater

> for most.

> There's a distinct lack of sky sports around the

> area now..especially with the Mag, old CPT, and

> soon to change Vale not showing footie (& rugby).

> Perhaps there are too many pubs in the area, or

> maybe not enough? - Just wondering....


"There's a distinct lack of sky sports around the area now"


That's surely not an accident. It tends to attract groups of older blokes. These pubs want trendy young couples and families.

whilst there have been a vast number of objections that wouldnt necessarily mean an automatic refuseful. not only would the objections be judged to be relative to the application issues theyd also need to concern the licensing objectives and based on that. its not a simple case of sorting thru a yes no pile there are rules and if those objections dont effect the objectives then they wont count. the establishment also have the opportunity thruout he application to respond to objections both to those objecting and to the council again, changing the possible outcome. so its not a simple case of saying there are so many objections so it will obviously be refused as its not how things r done.

the establishments "lack of involvement on this thread" is very wise. the edf is not an official platform for such things and as popular as the edf if it does not represent everyone in ed or the surrounding areas.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Our latest guest says that politicisation of universities is unhealthy, and the equation "Empire = Evil" is not historically tenable. He was used to speaking openly. Then in 2017 a Cambridge academic posted on social media in response to Biggar's proposed project looking at the Good and the Bad in Empire: "OMG this is serious shit. We Must CLOSE THIS DOWN." In his words, he saw there was a problem. Problems remain with embedded intolerance but this new member of the House of Lords still aspires to determine the truth of things. Meet Lord Biggar of Castle Douglas CBE, Regius Professor Emeritus of Moral & Pastoral Theology at Oxford University, on his visit to Peckham to talk with Chris Haydon and a small invited audience.  
    • What has any of this got to do with Gala?
    • I suspect Lambeth's legal team have decided that it is far better to potentially upset a High Court judge (maybe beg for forgiveness) than face the wrath of the legal teams of event organisers, promoters, service providers who would come after them for a lot of money if the event had to be cancelled. Clearly the original error was on the part of the council so I suspect that would make them liable for any losses/reputation damage incurred due cancellation/disruption.
    • I suspect it was putting "not bankrupting Lambeth Council" considerations first. Cancelling those festivals at a week to go could have been financially catastrophic and may have unleashed financial hell on Lambeth.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...