Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I agree with Saffron and DaveR. However, I think what some people were reacting to was more the tone of some of the comments than the idea that at any given time there are standard grammatical rules. There are loads of differences between spoken and written English and regional / colloquial speech. Some posters (though not all) seemed to be bothered more by those associated with immigrants / the poor.

Tone can be understood in a number of different ways. I've just re-read the thread, and personally I don't find it racist. Observing and commenting on cultural or race-related differences in itself is not racist. Neither is it racist or classist to want to hear one's own children speak in a similar manner to oneself, so long as none of these things is done in a way that disparages other cultures. It is possible to dislike other cultural practices to the preference of one's own without being racist. That is how I personally read the comments on this thread.


Herein is one of the curiosities of written versus spoken English, that two people may read the same statements and infer different tones. However, the beauty of online Forums is that they turn written English into (nearly) realtime conversations, allowing an interchange of ideas that reading alone does not allow.


It's a very interesting discussion.

I actually agree with you Saffron. I don't think anyone was being racist at all and one of the things that bothered me most about starting a family here with my English partner was that any children we have won?t sound like me (bizarre I know!) I was just clarifying what I thought the disagreement was about?that the speech patterns of the poor / immigrants seemed to be the target of some posters' disdain. For me, the ?Braying Henry? speech pattern is equally annoying though I have quite a few friends who speak that way! I suppose its really a question of examining "why" something bothers you more than other things.
Agreed. Funny, I also did not grow up in London, and my daughter already sounds different compared to me. But then again, she also sounds different to DH who did grow up in London. She makes her own unique word combinations, and I love hearing her language progress. She's nearly 3 years old. Our recent struggle has been to get her to say 'hospital' instead of 'hostibal'. I make a habit of just repeating it correctly without actually correcting her. Although occasionally when I'm very tired, she's gotten me saying it wrong.

"gotten" - that's surely not proper english? :)


Also just wanted to say that my comments aren't racially motivated either. Having been brought up down here in the south, I would feel the same if my kids were to start pronouncing 'bath' instead of 'bahth', and 'dance' instead of 'dahnce'. And I have northern friends who are equally horrified that their London offspring use the long vowel sound!

ladywotlunches Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> "gotten" - that's surely not proper english? :)

>


It is if you are American, then it is perfect! Like a lot of so-called 'Americanisms' it is actually an old English form that has gone out of use here.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • was the price not displayed on the menu?
    • It has come to this author’s attention that the world of 4+ admissions — that most enigmatic of educational rites — continues to bewilder even the most composed of parents. Fear not. For in a former life, I was not merely a humble observer, but a seasoned educator of over twenty years, and Head of Pre-Prep for a distinguished dozen. Now, with quill exchanged for touchscreen, I have taken to that most modern of salons — Instagram — to dispense guidance, answer frequently whispered questions, and illuminate the shadowy corners of school selection with clarity and calm. Each post bears my signature twist: a blend of insight, levity, and the occasional raised eyebrow. Should you find yourself adrift in the sea of admissions, I suggest you peruse my latest dispatch. It may well be the lifeline you seek. The Delicate Dilemma of the Summer-born 4+ Scholars Yours in solidarity and scholastic savvy, Lord Pencilton  🎩✏️
    • Perhaps Gooseygreeny was not familiar with the wildlife before Gala was imposed on the park, since when its value to wildlife has deteriorated. The Park had never been disturbed before, as the council had respected it as a Site of Importance for Nature Conservation, so only the Common was licensed by them as a site for events. The first time Gala held their event, there was a tree with woodpeckers nesting in it right in the middle of the main field they used and thrushes, blackbirds and great tits nesting within the shrubs and trees immediately surrounding the field. The woodpeckers were thriving on ants from the anthills in the grass. To those of us who used to enjoy watching the wildlife, it was very obviously a Site of Importance for a variety of birds. Despite being accessed by the public and their dogs, it had been relatively undisturbed,  which was one of the main reasons why it was so special and why I have been opposed to the Gala festival being held during the bird nesting season.
    • So dangerous!    Can you be more specific about the road this was in and when you report it?  Maybe there’s some CCTV footage available
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...