Jump to content

sociable cycle ride to Walthamstow Sat Feb 15th starts 9.30am


Sally Eva

Recommended Posts

Walthamstow! Why should anyone want to go there? Well, Waltham Forest Borough Council have won a hat full of awards for their ?Mini-Holland? project to improve walking and cycling. So this is a ride to see what all the fuss is about.


The group will meet at 9.30 at the Southwark Needle (located on SE corner of London Bridge, at top of Duke St Hill, adjacent to London Bridge Station see pic) for a 3.5 hour easy ride to Walthamstow. There's walk-on access for bikes at East Dulwich station and then a 14 minute journey by train to London Bridge (no steps in or out). The London Bridge trains are running on Saturday. A cycle route map is here: https://cycle.travel/map/journey/133449


The route out will cross London Bridge and then head through the City to Shoreditch, where riders join Q13. This takes us to London Fields where we join Q2 all the way to Lee Bridge Rd. The group goes along the mostly new segregated cycle lane on Lee Bridge Rd for 2 miles before turning off to Walthamstow Village and stops for coffee in the newly pedestrianised bit of Orford St.


The return will be via Lee Bridge Rd agaon and then through Leyton to the river Lea at Leyton Jubilee Park. The group will follow the segregated path on Orient Way to Temple Mills, then off road past the Tennis and Hockey Centre into the Olympic Park next to the Velodrome, across the top end of the park, out past the Copper Box and over the bridges across the River Lea and the A12 into Victoria Park. There's a nice wide path round to the Gunmakers Gate, then quiet streets to Mile End Park along the Regents Canal. From there the route joins CS2 to Aldgate where it turns left down to Tower Bridge and along Tooley St to our starting point at 1pm. A lot of the route is on Cycleways, some in parks and some on quiet streets. The route is here:



These regular Saturday rides are organised by Bruce Lynn and friends on behalf of Southwark Cyclists https://southwarkcyclists.org.uk . We are the borough branch of the London Cycling Campaign https://lcc.org.uk. The LCC campaigns for more cycling for more people. Cycling has to feel safe and enjoyable before more people will be comfortable doing it. That's what we want. Like everything else we do these rides are free and open to all. You don't need to book, just turn up, but if you want to contact us them you can email us at [email protected]; tweet us @southwarkcycle or text Bruce on 07729 279 945.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • There is no equivalence between One Dulwich purporting to be a local organisation speaking for local people, and actually properly constituted organisations such as The Dulwich Society. A 3 -second google search reveals the openly published names of the trustees of Dulwich Society, so I can make my own mind up as to whether these individuals are coming at local issues with a particular slant. I can read minutes of their meetings online, and whilst I might not agree with their every position, I can have confidence that they are an open and fundamentally democratic institution. There is absolutely nothing similar in terms of publicly accountable information to be found about One Dulwich - no idea of who is behind it, who pays for it ( it is clearly expensive), and on what basis they make their decisions.  Given the Police involvement in the intimidation of people with a public pro-LTN view ( for which there is no equivalence in terms of severity of any incident for those with an anti-LTN point of view), I can fully understand why, for Dulwich Society's traffic sub- committee only, they want a bit of online anonymity. I also find it slightly disturbing that when The Dulwich Society current leadership asked the 'grouping' pushing for changes within it for a meeting to discuss their concerns, they refused it. Given the recent experiences of organisations such as The National Trust, the question can be asked - is something similar going on here?   
    • I’ll post it to the DVLA if i don’t find the owner by midweek. 
    • The most recent one did, despite the council making it very difficult for anyone to object (which interestingly they were forced to change for the CPZ consultation and look how that went for them). I will dig out the responses for you when I have more time so you can enlighten yourself.   Ha ha...the language used by councils when they see the results of a consultation and need an out to ignore the views of locals...;-) Did you not notice how this only became a thing once the consultation had been run....one wonders why!? Earl you can bluster all you like but you cannot ignore the fact the council closed the junction to emergency services and put lives at risk and resisted all calls (from the emergency services) to open it for them. Surely you can't defend that  or are you willingly turning a blind eye to that too? Ha ha, which kind of begs the question then why so many of you get so vexed by One Dulwich? Surely you could compartmentalise their work if the above was true? I suspect it has a lot to do with the accountability that they are forcing and the fact some don't like it.
    • I believe around 57% of the 5,538 people who were part of the self selecting sample making up the original consultation, opposed the LTN. So just over 3,000 people. This was around 3 years ago now. I think there’s something like 40,000+ living across se22 and SE21 🤷‍♂️  The LTN is a minority interest at best. Whilst it’s an obsession for a small number on the transport thread who strongly oppose it, I suspect most locals quietly approve of the improvements made to that junction. …and we still haven’t heard who has supposedly been pressurising the emergency services and how (are we seriously going with the far left / the commies)? Is anyone willing to stand up and support the 'One' claim that people are partially covering their plates and driving through the filters due to inadequate signage? Again, it all sounds a little ridiculous / desperate. Feels like it may be time for them to start coming to terms with the changes.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...