Jump to content

Recommended Posts

This September an exciting new toddler and pre-school class is opening in East Dulwich.


There are free trials on the 29th August and 5th September - space is limited so please contact me to reserve your space for these; 07903830384 or email [email protected]


Classes take place at the EDT (East Dulwich Tavern) 1 Lordship Lane, and are aimed at toddlers and pre-school children. They are based around a main character going on an adventure to help a friend. There will be educational elements involved but the emphasis will be on the children having lots of fun. To find out more please visit the website: www.fuzzyandfriends.com


Term starts on the 12th September and you are welcome to "drop in" to classes throughout the term (but those who do sign up for a term get a discount and a free toy).


There are no registration fees or hidden costs. Once term starts classes cost ?6 per child at a drop in rate with a 10% discount if you sign up for a term. Siblings under one year are free and siblings over a year are half price.


Free tea and biscuits are offered to parents after each class and there is a free play area with a toy box to keep children amused so parents can stay and chat.


Please let me know if you have any questions and I look forward to hopefully seeing you at a class soon,


Tara

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Private Lady From Your City - No Verify - Anonymous Adult Dating https://PrivateLadyEscorts.com [url=https://PrivateLadyEscorts.com] Private Lady In Your City [/url] - Anonymous Adult Dating - No Verify NEW GIRLS [url=https://privateladyescorts.com/girl/kira-liv-69.html]Kira-Liv[/url] [url=https://privateladyescorts.com/girl/mia-candy-43.html]Mia Candy[/url] [url=https://privateladyescorts.com/girl/sofia-119.html]Sofia[/url] [url=https://privateladyescorts.com/girl/mistress-ivanka-36.html]Mistress Ivanka[/url] [url=https://privateladyescorts.com/girl/goddess-sigal-62.html]Goddess Sigal[/url] [url=https://privateladyescorts.com/girl/clara-blanc-95.html]Clara Blanc[/url] [url=https://privateladyescorts.com/girl/ali-cruz-32.html]Ali Cruz[/url]
    • Thank you, I will be vigilant
    • @Sue said: nobody is blaming the child, they are blaming the person who should have been watching him g) do you really think it was acceptable for that person to find the situation funny? This is the point. Adults are meant to teach their children by example. It sounds as though the adult guardian/ father in this case did not react appropriately. Had a truly sincere apology been given,  I suspect the OP would not have posted on here. It is possible the OP snapped in the heat of the moment, but they were possibly startled because they were hit from behind? If we are startled it can be instinctive to initially react with anger. I also agree that it would be highly irresponsible to let any very young child ride or walk or do anything on a busy public street without supervision- most of all to protect the child. If in this case the child was out of the adult's line of sight that is perhaps another indication that the father needs a refresh in appropriate behaviour around a child, as well as his manners.
    • Malumbu,  if none of us were there, does that mean that nobody should post anything on here unless they have witnesses from the EDF? Why would someone post something like this if it  wasn't true? This is not about whether children should or should not be cycling on the pavement. There are specific issues. a) the child was out of sight of the person supposed to be caring for him b) he appears to have been  either not looking where he was going or was out of control of the bike c) if he did see that he was about to hit someone  he apparently did not give them any kind of warning  d)  a person was unexpectedly hit from behind whilst just walking along, which in my view makes him a victim e) does the title of the thread really matter as the issue was described in the first post?  f) nobody is blaming the child, they are blaming the person who should have been watching him g) do you really think it was acceptable for that person to find the situation funny? The OP was not complaining about the 4 year old. They were complaining about an adult's lack of supervision of a 4 year old who was not capable of riding a bike and who hit someone from behind with no warning. Also, apart from reading the OP more carefully, perhaps also choose your words more carefully. Jobless? Lunatic? Charming.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...