Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Oh Seabag, don't you realise the baby was probably

> ordered by Cummings? It's the sort of announcement

> that can be kept up the sleeve for a good while,

> to be used to deflect attention from other

> 'negative' stories. Perfect weekend for it.


The sprog is also due to be dropped in early summer, which just happens to be around the time of the No Deal deadline. Still, look on the positive side, it makes a change for him to publicly acknowledge he's got one of his floozies up the duff...

> The sprog is also due to be dropped in early

> summer, which just happens to be around the time

> of the No Deal deadline. Still, look on the

> positive side, it makes a change for him to

> publicly acknowledge he's got one of his floozies

> up the duff...


There was a rumour that he hid away for a couple of weeks due to having a black eye. Maybe he had no option but to announce it. Remember Camberwellgate?

diable rouge Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

Still, look on the

> positive side, it makes a change for him to

> publicly acknowledge he's got one of his floozies

> up the duff...



There is no positive side. There will soon be another person in the world who has half BJ's genes.

Cynicism aside, it?s a new life in the world and Ms Symonds deserves to have her pregnancy respected.


But Boris hasn?t the greatest rep regarding his record for sticking in there as a parent, but this time might be different.


Plus he?s 55 now, so maybe he?s matured enough to see this one through.


Maybe maybe

I was thinking, maybe Prince Andrew might announce he?s pregnant


I know it?s a long shot, but this with a bit of airbrushing of his past could turn his life around. Add to that a cover on HELLO WTF magazine, with Andy and his new baby bump.


A few years ago it?d be a ludicrous idea, but it could work now in this day and age of diversity and tolerance.

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> There was a rumour that he hid away for a couple

> of weeks due to having a black eye. Maybe he had

> no option but to announce it. Remember

> Camberwellgate?


Another that he was paid an advance on a book that needed to be written soon.

nxjen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> dbboy Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > She's 31, nearly half his age, what was she

> ever

> > thinking when she let him shaft her??

>

> Oh don?t, this news item is making me nauseous

> enough already.


It's even made the Daily Mail nauseous


https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-8063043/STEPHEN-GLOVER-pray-end-Boris-bounder.html

It's the new normal. This would have ruined a political career in the recent past. Now lies and personal life the response from many is "well that just shows what a normal person he is". Maybe it's some perverse thing that the media normally needs to find this stuff out, but as he has made it easy then the reaction is very different.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Disclaimer, some of the later  SMB stuff is insipid but I like this.  I
    • I'm pleased to have gone onto a meter as it has saved us money.  When first fitted we found there was a leak and TW replaced the old lead pipe with plastic (we had to pay the last few metres into the house but some geezer did this at a fair price). No doubt others have positive experiences too.   Otherwise I'm no fan of the private utilities but that shouldn't colour our opinions.  
    • I recall that when the meter was installed it it was not set at zero. Presumably it had come from elsewhere or was a recon one.    Same here. I phoned TW today to ask if there was a meter at our property (even though I knew there was) and I was told quite categorically that there was not and that our bill was calculated on RV value When I asked why we used to get our meter readings shown online in our account, It they could not provide an explanation. Our RV value according to TW is 547 which equated to a 4-5 bedroom property with a large garden. With just two of us living here then our consumption must be well below the expected volume. Given the facts, I am totally convinced no that TW have an algorithm that hides the actual meter readings when the actual consumption is below the RV based consumption suggesting they are a bunch of shameless rogues!!  
    • Let me get this straight . The OP  was hit from behind by a small person out of control on a bike whose father was not only not watching him but could not watch him, because he was not in a position to see him. Are you disputing that "side of the story"? Why would someone who rarely posts on here come on here to post that? Then the OP remonstrated with the father. What would you have done in that situation?  You seem absolutely determined to put the OP in the wrong.  What exactly is your motive in doing that? Do you always assume that someone is lying when you haven't heard "both sides of the story"? Do you always disbelieve anything you are told because there are so "many possibilities"? The father in question is hardly likely to come on here to defend his lack of care of his child, is he?  And btw there were no "casual onlookers". The people who laughed were apparently the child's father and those with him. Who did not witness  "someone being smacked into by a 4 year old on a bike" because the child was out of their line of sight. It seems that you can't even get right something which is posted on a forum and there in writing for all to see. Let's hope you are never called as a witness in a court case.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...