Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I had a flyer through my door recently, headed "Need Extra Cash?" and basically advertising work delivering/collecting "small catalogues".


I googled the company but am none the wiser, though there seem to be several similar companies around. Their website consists solely of the (limited) information on the flyer and a form to submit personal information.


It all seems a bit iffy to me, though if it was that iffy I'd have thought something would have come up on the google search.


I wondered whether anybody had had any experience of them (I could do with extra cash, hence the interest!)


I must admit I did warm a bit to a company whose flyer says "Lose weight naturally by walking" :)

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/25008-catalogues-2-cash/
Share on other sites

It's a Scam....


?500 P/W ??


Does anyone really believe you will get ?26k a year for delivering cataloues. ??


Their Website is just an HTML Form and gives no Details about the people you are dealing with.


I'm not even going to put the link here.


In Addition once you have replied giving your Name and Postcode.

You could be inundated with letters for Get Rich Quick Scams..


As you would of been identified as someone in need of cash.


Fox.

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It's a Scam....

>

>


xxxxxxxx


I'm sure it is, and that's why I posted here rather than filling in their form, and why I can't understand why I could find nothing about the scam online.


I found a website along the lines of "Ten scam money-making schemes", and the catalogue thing wasn't included, let alone this particular site.


To be fair, Foxy, it says ?50 - ?500 a week - I completely agree with you that ?500 is ridiculous, as you'd have to be working about 24/7 to make that sort of cash.


I liked their age limits of 18 - 80, as well :)


I guess anybody doing a google search will now come up with this thread .....

Bic Basher Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> You'll probably end up buying the catalogues and

> then the goods if you're lucky to get any

> customers and not making a profit.


xxxxxx


It was presented as just posting the catalogues through letter boxes, but I completely agree with all Fox says.

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

> It was presented as just posting the catalogues

> through letter boxes, but I completely agree with

> all Fox says.


That may be true, or it may not. Legitimate delivery companies do exist.


However, the Registrant of the domain (registered in March this year) is UK Health & Fitness, a company that doesn't exist, unless it's the same as UK Health and Fitness Solutions Ltd which, according to Companies House, has a different address and will be Dissolved on 14/08/2012.


The address of the domain registrant is, interestingly enough,


58 Stanbury Road, London, SW15 4EH


And that's interesting because the postcode doesn't match.


There's nothing inherently suspicious about what may be a suburban terrace (in Peckham or Richmond, depending which bit you believe) with a dodgy postcode is operating a domain registered in Canada to run a website hosted in Arizona, but it does suggest a lack of transparency, especially given the website, designed by a Paul Vagg (who appears to have designed nothing else and seems oddly coy about attracting new clients), neither carries a privacy policy nor the registration details of the company operating it. Both of which are fairly illegal. Neither is it very worried about securing your personal information - the form is plain http instead of https.


I do know that people do run round putting unsolicited leaflets and catalogues through doors, even though it's never the same person twice, and I presume they do it for money. But I suspect it's only worthwhile if there is literally nothing else to do and HMRC doesn't find out. I also suspect that they're not recruited by dodgy websites, even if they have got a picture of the London Eye.


I'd steer clear, if I were you. And, if you're ever tempted by similar sites, just check them out (using 'whois' and companies house). If things don't match up, it's almost certainly a scam.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Morally they should, but we don't actually vote for parties in our electoral system. We vote for a parliamentary (or council) representative. That candidates group together under party unbrellas is irrelevant. We have a 'representative' democracy, not a party political one (if that makes sense). That's where I am on things at the moment. Reform are knocking on the door of the BNP, and using wedge issues to bait emotional rage. The Greens are knocking on the door of the hard left, sweeping up the Corbynista idealists. But it's worth saying that both are only ascending because of the failures of the two main parties and the successive governments they have led. Large parts of the country have been left in economic decline for decades, while city fat cats became uber wealthy. Young people have been screwed over by student loans. Housing is 40 years of commoditisation, removing affordabilty beyond the reach of too many. Decently paid, secure jobs, seem to be a thing of the past. Which of the main parties can people turn to, to fix any of these things, when the main parties are the reason for the mess that has been allowed to evolve? Reform certainly aren't the answer to those things. The Greens may aspire to do something meaningful about some of them, but where will they find the money to pay for it? None of it's easy.
    • Yes, but the context is important and the reason.
    • That messes up Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland - democracy being based on citizenship not literacy. There's intentionally no one language that campaign materials have to be in. 
    • TBH if people don't see what is sectarian in the materials linked to above when they read about them, then I don't think me going on about it will help. They speak for themselves.  I don't know how the Greens can justify promising to be a strong voice for one particular religion. Will that pledge hold when it comes to campaigning in East Dulwich (which is majority atheist)? https://censusdata.uk/e02000836-east-dulwich/ts030-religion
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...