Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> If you know who this is, I'd be extremely grateful

> if you could ask them to turn it down :(




I'd be extremely grateful if you'd be a lot less nasty at times, Sue.

Maybe then people like Springer wouldn't give you a taste of your own medicine.

How was what I said "nasty", exactly, ED Bird?


And when else have I been "nasty"?


How can I be "a lot less nasty"?


Please explain. Thanks.


You can click on my name to see all my previous posts on here, if that helps you find examples.


ETA: I'm really upset to see that you are one of what I thought were lovely people coordinating the help for people round here.


I am self-isolating, and now I don't feel I want any help, however much I may need it.


I am also back in bed and feeling quite ill. I can do without this, tbh.

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> How was what I said "nasty", exactly, ED Bird?

>

> And when else have I been "nasty"?

>

> How can I be "a lot less nasty"?

>

> Please explain. Thanks.

>

> You can click on my name to see all my previous

> posts on here, if that helps you find examples.

>

> ETA: I'm really upset to see that you are one of

> what I thought were lovely people coordinating the

> help for people round here.

>

> I am self-isolating, and now I don't feel I want

> any help, however much I may need it.

>

> I am also back in bed and feeling quite ill. I can

> do without this, tbh.


hmmm, there's a familiarity to these sort of posts methinks...

Sue Wrote:

> ETA: I'm really upset to see that you are one of

> what I thought were lovely people coordinating the

> help for people round here.



I am. I'm also someone you have attacked many times in the past for literally no reason,

so maybe you should be a bit more careful.

ED Bird Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sue Wrote:

> > ETA: I'm really upset to see that you are one

> of

> > what I thought were lovely people coordinating

> the

> > help for people round here.

>

>

> I am. I'm also someone you have attacked many

> times in the past for literally no reason,

> so maybe you should be a bit more careful.



Please give me examples.


And please answer the questions in my previous post.


Are you sure you are not confusing me with somebody else?


As I have no recollection whatsoever of "attacking" you, let alone many times, and let alone for no reason.


Thanks.


ETA: And please explain what you mean by "maybe you should be a bit more careful", which unless I have misunderstood you, sounds quite threatening.


My apologies if that was not your intention.


But you really cannot make these accusations about me out of the blue and give no examples to back them up.


You've got enough posts to choose from, I've been an active member of this forum for over thirteen years.

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ED Bird Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

>

> ETA: And please explain what you mean by "maybe

> you should be a bit more careful", which unless I

> have misunderstood you, sounds quite threatening.

>

> My apologies if that was not your intention.



This is exactly what you do & how it has lead to many personal attacks in the past.


You have a very twisted way of thinking, Sue. Did it not occur to you that all I meant was: maybe you should be a little bit more careful with how you treat people on these forums because they are people you don't know & they might just end up being the ones you need? I don't see any of your forum buddies stepping up to help. The usual clique of EDF bullies have all gone into hiding.



I'm not going to entertain you. What good could come out of opening a can of worms? Would you now apologise for your actions? Damage is done. So no... I don't think I will tell you. Perhaps the mystery of not knowing will give you pause whenever you get that urge to drag some innocent poster down. I just hope you take the time to reflect on your own actions when people like Springer come along.


Now that you know I have far more important things to tend to... Take care, Sue.

So basically, you can give me no evidence to back up your accusations.


I will draw my own conclusions, and so can others.


Anybody can click on my name, look at all the posts I have made on here in over thirteen years, and also look at the context in which I made them.


I am only too happy to apologise if appropriate, as indeed I have done in the past.


I am wondering why, with all the obvious trolls on this forum, you have suddenly decided to pick on me.


And I don't have "forum buddies", as you call them. I obviously know some posters on here in real life, because they are friends and neighbours.


Why exactly do you think telling me what I am supposed to have done wrong would be "entertaining" me?


Tell me what I have done, and if it is as terrible if you are telling everybody it is, then of course I will apologise, without hesitation.


Oh, and I do not hide under a pseudonym on here. I run (or did until this crisis) local music events with my partner as The Goose Is Out! and I live in Ulverscroft Road.


PM me and I will give you my mobile number. If you won't tell me on here what I am supposed to have done, you can phone me and tell me privately.


If you won't do that either, then again, I draw my own conclusions.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I'm a bit worried by your sudden involvement on this Forum.  The former Prince Andrew is now Andrew Mountbatten Windsor Mountbatten in an anglicisation of Von Battenburg adopted by that branch of our Royal Family in 1917 due to anti-German sentiment. Another anglicisation could be simply Battenburg as in the checker board cake.  So I surmise that your are Andrew Battenburg, aka Andrew Mountbatten Windsor and that you have infiltrated social media so that the country can put the emphasis on Mandelson ather than yourself.  Bit of a failure. I don't expect an answer from police custody.  
    • We had John fit our PLYKEA kitchen (IKEA cabinets with custom doors) and would happily recommend him and Gabi to anyone. Gabi handled all communication and was brilliant throughout — responsive and happy to answer questions however detailed. John is meticulous, cares about the small details, and was a pleasure to have in the house. The carpentry required for the custom doors was done to a high standard, and he even refinished the plumbing under the sink to sit better with the new cabinets — a small touch that made a real difference. They were happy to return and tie up a few things that couldn't be finished in the time, which we appreciated. No hesitations recommending them.
    • Not sure about that. Rockets seems to have (rightly in my view) identified two key motivating elements in Mcash's defection: anger at his previous (arguably shabby) treatment and a (linked) desire to trash the Labour party, nationally and locally. The defection, timed for maximum damage, combined with the invective and moral exhibitionism of his statement counts as rather more than a "hissy fit".  I would add a third motivation of political ambition: it's not inconceivable that he has his eye on the Dulwich & West Norwood seat which is predicted to go Green.  James Barber was indulging in typical LibDem sleight of hand, claiming that Blair introduced austerity to *councils* before the coalition. This is a kind of sixth form debating point. From 1997-1999 Labour broadly stuck to Tory spending totals, meaning there was limited growth in departmental spending, including local govt grants. However local government funding rose substantially in the Noughties, especially in education and social care. It is a matter of record that real-terms local authority spending increased in the Blair / Brown years overall. So he's manifestly wrong (or only right if the focus is on 1997-1999, which would be a bizarre focus and one he didn't include in his claim) but he wasn't claiming Blair introduced austerity more widely. 
    • My view is that any party that welcomes a self-declared Marxist would merit a negative point. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...