Jump to content

Recommendations for personal shoppers


Recommended Posts

Really, those jeans cost over ?1000?

They were hand-made by medically verified virigins from a small tribe on the rocky shores of the Menai Straits, and made from only the finest Egyptian cotton washed in babies' tears, the seams stitched using unicorn mane.

The likes of Cilla Black and Julio Iglesias would never be seen dead in them because they're still alive, though I'm not a hudred percent sure in the case of cilla black......or julio iglesias for that matter.

There's good reason to visit a food store every day, but there's no good reason to visit a menswear department whose clothing line up you consider to be complete and utter rubbish.


Unless you're a mad in the head delusional paranoid who thinks they have relationships with people who don't know them.

Palore, thank you for your suggestion; that sounds perfect. You also win this week's forum prize for actually reading the posts before answering.


I wasn't going to comment on UDT's bizarre posturings - a gentle drawing aside of skirts seemed kinder - but have to say I'm loving the use of 'eta'. I'm going to drop it into a conversation some time today and see what reaction I get. I'm guessing a slight recoil or maybe a smirk.

Sorry, Moos, no reprimand intended! Thanks for your suggestion; just not what I'm after at the mo.


At that moment I was feeling a bit overwhelmed by a combination of UDT's posts and Jeremy sneering at me for finding clothes shopping (actually even the thought of shopping) exhausting and having the temerity to ask for recommendations. Apparently I should have been focusing on providing entertainment.

I can see why anyone would want be waited on hand and foot for no fee. That's a no brainier surely?


I just can't see how the shop chooses who to give it to: they can't give it to everyone, I can't imagine stamping your foot and demanding it being a good reason, I can't imagine that just being tired by shopping is a good reason (isn't everyone?).


The only logical reason would be the Richard Gere / Julia Roberts reason, but if you're not committed to buying anything then why bother?

You know what we're gonna need here? We're going to need a few more people helping us out. I'll tell you why. We are going to be spending an obscene amount of money in here. So we're going to need a lot more help sucking up to us, 'cause that's what we really like.

Ms B Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sorry, Moos, no reprimand intended! Thanks for

> your suggestion; just not what I'm after at the

> mo.

>

> At that moment I was feeling a bit overwhelmed by

> a combination of UDT's posts and Jeremy sneering

> at me for finding clothes shopping (actually even

> the thought of shopping) exhausting and having the

> temerity to ask for recommendations. Apparently I

> should have been focusing on providing

> entertainment.


None taken, and it's understandable that you might be a bit exasperated by some of the contributions. I personally find the show/hide button useful. Or I used to..

Daresay I'll regret taking you seriously enough to respond again, Huguenot, but I don't see what's so hard to understand. (Unless you're just seeing this as an opportunity to imply a variety of nasty things about me? I don't see why you should but that seems to be what some people come here for.)


Apart from at the top end, the big stores mostly stock the same ranges at the same prices, so it's largely atmosphere, service and overall shopping experience that make you choose one shop over another. Also a way for shops to get people to come in and spend money who would otherwise stay away and make their existing clothes go another year or two, and if they can make it easier for you then you're more likely to go back to them next time, aren't you.

You think I'm having a go at you Ms B? Not at all. I'm just interested that's all.


I can see that for you it make absolute sense. It's the shop I can't understand.


What you say is logical, but it's inefficient. There's a cost on staff, catering and even floor space and overheads.


Debenhams isn't a high margin store, it's low margin mass produced stuff. Unless you spend quite a lot on clothes at one sitting then they'll make a loss on everything they sell you - they might as well not have you as a customer. They'd be better off without you.


The only argument is to run it as a loss leader, but then everyone would want your special treatment and they couldn't provide it. They'd end up pissing off more customers than they won.


Selfridges and Harrods make sense because of the margins and ticket price, but you've already said that you want to save money, not spend it.


It's the first time I've come across the idea that this service is available to low margin high street customers as opposed to Premiership WAGs.


I just don't get it.

Well no, increased market share at a loss isn't worth winning unless there is some other benefit.


That's why I think I've missed something here.


Anyway, I'm watching this thread with an eagle eye, and the second you let us know where you get it I shall be on the case and find out what it's all about!

It's a good bit of PR for the shops - presents a customer-focussed image - and though I've never used one myself, I can see the bonus of using a personal shopper. Shopping *can* be exhausting, especially as most women's clothes are designed for 6 foot 5 skinny boys!!
I find that being over forty with a lack of ability to choose clothes easily from racks, working full time and running a home with four children, the personal shopping experience to be a wonderful self indulgence. I have been several times over the last few years and of course if they find the outfit you like with all necessary lingerie and shoes, wrap, jewellery, or whatever, and sometimes you can't resist, or are even grateful, for the chance to buy more than one outfit because it looks so good, then obviously the service pays for itself, and I would be extremely disappointed if it ever became unavailable, not being very keen on spending the extra time travelling up to London. It amazes me that people spend so much time criticising questions on this forum instead of being helpful!

Highly entertaining thread one way or another.


Ms B, in my well off days, I went once to Harrods and used a girl there. I bought lots of things and took most back the next week. They were highly suspicious and my customer loyalty evaporated!


Friends swear by John Lewis service.

I'm surprised Debs does it for the same reasons Hugeonot explains. IPhone spelling sorry.


I have all the issues you explained in your opening post. I tend to look on the Internet at some length first and then go into town with more of a focus. I also find that you can get things on eg Phase Eight website that are not available otherwise.


El Pibe, your "knowledgeable customer" post was hilarious.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hello,  I feel as though our apartment is damp. I would like to borrow a dehumidifier to ascertain whether it is or not. Does anyone have a dehumidifier that I could borrow for a week?  thank you,    Brigid
    • Post much better this Xmas.  Sue posted about whether they send Xmas cards; how good the post is,  is relevant.  Think I will continue to stay off Instagram!
    • These have reduced over the years, are "perfect" lives Round Robins being replaced by "perfect" lives Instagram posts where we see all year round how people portray their perfect lives ?    The point of this thread is that for the last few years, due to issues at the mail offices, we had delays to post over Christmas. Not really been flagged as an issue this year but I am still betting on the odd card, posted well before Christmas, arriving late January. 
    • Two subjects here.  Xmas cards,  We receive and send less of them.  One reason is that the cost of postage - although interestingly not as much as I thought say compared to 10 years ago (a little more than inflation).  Fun fact when inflation was double digits in the 70s cost of postage almost doubled in one year.  Postage is not a good indication of general inflation fluctuating a fair bit.  The huge rise in international postage that for a 20g Christmas card to Europe (no longer a 20g price, now have to do up to 100g), or a cheapskate 10g card to the 'States (again have to go up to the 100g price) , both around a quid in 2015, and now has more than doubled in real terms.  Cards exchanged with the US last year were arriving in the New Year.  Funnily enough they came much quicker this year.  So all my cards abroad were by email this year. The other reason we send less cards is that it was once a good opportunity to keep in touch with news.  I still personalise many cards with a news and for some a letter, and am a bit grumpy when I get a single line back,  Or worse a round robin about their perfect lives and families.  But most of us now communicate I expect primarily by WhatApp, email, FB etc.  No need for lightweight airmail envelope and paper in one.    The other subject is the mail as a whole. Privitisation appears to have done it no favours and the opening up of competition with restrictions on competing for parcel post with the new entrants.  Clearly unless you do special delivery there is a good chance that first class will not be delivered in a day as was expected in the past.   Should we have kept a public owned service subsidised by the tax payer?  You could also question how much lead on innovation was lost following the hiving off of the national telecommunications and mail network.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...