Jump to content

Recommended Posts

We are in talks with the local police and the council to get CCTV installed, due to no CCTV on Lordship Lane. Dontbesilly, I suggest you do your research before you start spouting nonsense. The irony is literally in the name.

i am not sure what your agenda is dontbesilly, however clearly you couldn't care less about the ED community.


dontbesilly Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> monica Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Dontbesilly are you ok???

>

>

> Are you ok? You keep demanding the council spends

> money on something that is already there. Stop

> sensationalising a few people stealing some booze

> from the shops of Lordship Lane, we are in a

> borough with one of the highest knife crime rates

> in London- get a grip.

Victimless crime, hurrah! Now we can all shoplift without consequence to anyone. Sod the shops, sod the other customers (especially the ones who pay) oh, and sod the suppliers too.



dontbesilly Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Co-op on Lordship lane absolutely have CCTV, there

> is sporadic announcements advising that Mitie (an

> external security company) are constantly

> monitoring the system, and in addition there is 1

> and sometimes 2 security guards in the shop.

>

> Can i just check why anyone would actually care if

> people nick a few bits from a major supermarket

> retailer? it has no effect on you whatsoever, why

> waste your time worrying about it? It must be nice

> not having to worry about money but some people

> do, and shoplifting (victimless crime) is a good

> way to make up for the lack of benefits and social

> help this country now provides for those down in

> doldrums.

monica Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> We are in talks with the local police and the

> council to get CCTV installed, due to no CCTV on

> Lordship Lane. Dontbesilly, I suggest you do your

> research before you start spouting nonsense. The

> irony is literally in the name.

> i am not sure what your agenda is dontbesilly,

> however clearly you couldn't care less about the

> ED community.

>

> dontbesilly Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > monica Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > Dontbesilly are you ok???

> >

> >

> > Are you ok? You keep demanding the council

> spends

> > money on something that is already there. Stop

> > sensationalising a few people stealing some

> booze

> > from the shops of Lordship Lane, we are in a

> > borough with one of the highest knife crime

> rates

> > in London- get a grip.


No, not particularly. Its amazing how fanatical people get on here about the simplest most irrelevant thing- someone didnt clean up their dog poo- disgraceful! Someone nicked something from the local co-op- burn the witch! My bins didnt get emptied on time- scandalous! All whilst perched nicely in your ?1 million + fancy East Dulwich house, when a mile or so away other humans are living in poverty. I really hope you get your CCTV, so some feckless junkies can be sent to prison for a couple of months for nicking a sandwich, perhaps that will make the 'ED community' so much safer.

Than I suggest you do your best to help those in need and stop posting stupid comments. No one cares about your opinion. If you want a sob story, try watching your loved one dying in front of you and there is nothing you can do about it. I doubt very much you live locally, and I suggest the next time you travel to the East Dulwich borders, bring your passport, and we will see you if you are worthy of being in the greatness that is East Dulwich.

Close the door on the way out of ED dontbesilly, or the more apt name would be, Iamsilly



dontbesilly Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> monica Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > We are in talks with the local police and the

> > council to get CCTV installed, due to no CCTV

> on

> > Lordship Lane. Dontbesilly, I suggest you do

> your

> > research before you start spouting nonsense.

> The

> > irony is literally in the name.

> > i am not sure what your agenda is dontbesilly,

> > however clearly you couldn't care less about

> the

> > ED community.

> >

> > dontbesilly Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > monica Wrote:

> > >

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> >

> > > -----

> > > > Dontbesilly are you ok???

> > >

> > >

> > > Are you ok? You keep demanding the council

> > spends

> > > money on something that is already there.

> Stop

> > > sensationalising a few people stealing some

> > booze

> > > from the shops of Lordship Lane, we are in a

> > > borough with one of the highest knife crime

> > rates

> > > in London- get a grip.

>

> No, not particularly. Its amazing how fanatical

> people get on here about the simplest most

> irrelevant thing- someone didnt clean up their dog

> poo- disgraceful! Someone nicked something from

> the local co-op- burn the witch! My bins didnt get

> emptied on time- scandalous! All whilst perched

> nicely in your ?1 million + fancy East Dulwich

> house, when a mile or so away other humans are

> living in poverty. I really hope you get your

> CCTV, so some feckless junkies can be sent to

> prison for a couple of months for nicking a

> sandwich, perhaps that will make the 'ED

> community' so much safer.

monica Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Than I suggest you do your best to help those in

> need and stop posting stupid comments. No one

> cares about your opinion. If you want a sob story,

> try watching your loved one dying in front of you

> and there is nothing you can do about it. I doubt

> very much you live locally, and I suggest the next

> time you travel to the East Dulwich borders, bring

> your passport, and we will see you if you are

> worthy of being in the greatness that is East

> Dulwich.

> Close the door on the way out of ED dontbesilly,

> or the more apt name would be, Iamsilly

>

>

> dontbesilly Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > monica Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > We are in talks with the local police and the

> > > council to get CCTV installed, due to no CCTV

> > on

> > > Lordship Lane. Dontbesilly, I suggest you do

> > your

> > > research before you start spouting nonsense.

> > The

> > > irony is literally in the name.

> > > i am not sure what your agenda is

> dontbesilly,

> > > however clearly you couldn't care less about

> > the

> > > ED community.

> > >

> > > dontbesilly Wrote:

> > >

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> >

> > > -----

> > > > monica Wrote:

> > > >

> > >

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> >

> > >

> > > > -----

> > > > > Dontbesilly are you ok???

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Are you ok? You keep demanding the council

> > > spends

> > > > money on something that is already there.

> > Stop

> > > > sensationalising a few people stealing some

> > > booze

> > > > from the shops of Lordship Lane, we are in

> a

> > > > borough with one of the highest knife crime

> > > rates

> > > > in London- get a grip.

> >

> > No, not particularly. Its amazing how fanatical

> > people get on here about the simplest most

> > irrelevant thing- someone didnt clean up their

> dog

> > poo- disgraceful! Someone nicked something from

> > the local co-op- burn the witch! My bins didnt

> get

> > emptied on time- scandalous! All whilst perched

> > nicely in your ?1 million + fancy East Dulwich

> > house, when a mile or so away other humans are

> > living in poverty. I really hope you get your

> > CCTV, so some feckless junkies can be sent to

> > prison for a couple of months for nicking a

> > sandwich, perhaps that will make the 'ED

> > community' so much safer.


Dontbesilly Is clearly a vile troll with a lot of time on their hands full of bitterness and bile.

Let's face it, those who genuinely care about people who live in poverty would think a lot more about how their actions impact these people. Refusing to wear a mask in shops puts the workers and fellow customers at higher risk of catching the virus and the poorest in our society are those who can least afford to get ill as many have no financial security when they can't work. And having seen the staff in Co-op valiantly chase down shoplifters, I'd suggest these people care very much about this issue as well.

monica Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Than I suggest you do your best to help those in

> need and stop posting stupid comments. No one

> cares about your opinion. If you want a sob story,

> try watching your loved one dying in front of you

> and there is nothing you can do about it. I doubt

> very much you live locally, and I suggest the next

> time you travel to the East Dulwich borders, bring

> your passport, and we will see you if you are

> worthy of being in the greatness that is East

> Dulwich.

> Close the door on the way out of ED dontbesilly,

> or the more apt name would be, Iamsilly



What a sneery, obnoxious response. I do not want your sob story, although its actually quite refreshing to hear of some real life woes here rather than the pathetic whingeing about middle class problems in a city with all manner of social issues and widespread deprivation. I do live locally, although im sure i've probably noticed you looking down your nose at me in M&S because im not lucky enough to be a millionaire when assets are taken into account, as most are around here. Ill just continue on fine and dandy remaining ruefully amused at posts such as yours, good luck with your utterly cringeworthy and pointless crusade to get CCTV installed (when it already is- how do think that tragic incident outside the corner shop last year got solved?) perhaps if you stamp your foot enough someone will take pity on you and pander to your demands.

Sounds like you're a bit miffed about your wealth DBS ?

I'm not sure there's a vetting process or expectation that M&S customers are millionaires, if they did, most would be refused I'm sure !

You've mentioned 'million pound homes' (words to that effect) previously. Those owning a house worth a million or so, almost certainly didn't buy in cash, which implies a mortgage (probably a very large one !) which means unless the owners have other assets and cash to make up the balance they are NOT millionaires.

But the way you go on about it, as if people have been gifted wealth but the freebies ran-out by time you got to the front of the queue for a hand-out, comes over as petulant.

It's obvious that you're on a wind-up on several threads, and fun reading it is too, so I probably should take what you write with a pinch of salt - but a correction was due on the 'millionaire' assumption you seem to consistently and mistakenly make.

Dontbesilly, The CCTV you refer to is the TFL camera not CCTV. I was chatting to some other forumites on the lane today, whilst drinking my oat cappuccino and flashing my black amex around. The other forumites think you are a hoot, absolutely hilarious, sad pathetic and hilarious. How silly of you to mistake a TFL camera for CCTV. You really are silly billy, or maybe you are a hillbilly.

Now jog on back to the borders where you belong, don't forget the binocluars, so you can stare at ED lovingly, wantingly and lustfully.

This is fun, sporting with the peasants



dontbesilly Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> monica Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Than I suggest you do your best to help those

> in

> > need and stop posting stupid comments. No one

> > cares about your opinion. If you want a sob

> story,

> > try watching your loved one dying in front of

> you

> > and there is nothing you can do about it. I

> doubt

> > very much you live locally, and I suggest the

> next

> > time you travel to the East Dulwich borders,

> bring

> > your passport, and we will see you if you are

> > worthy of being in the greatness that is East

> > Dulwich.

> > Close the door on the way out of ED

> dontbesilly,

> > or the more apt name would be, Iamsilly

>

>

> What a sneery, obnoxious response. I do not want

> your sob story, although its actually quite

> refreshing to hear of some real life woes here

> rather than the pathetic whingeing about middle

> class problems in a city with all manner of social

> issues and widespread deprivation. I do live

> locally, although im sure i've probably noticed

> you looking down your nose at me in M&S because im

> not lucky enough to be a millionaire when assets

> are taken into account, as most are around here.

> Ill just continue on fine and dandy remaining

> ruefully amused at posts such as yours, good luck

> with your utterly cringeworthy and pointless

> crusade to get CCTV installed (when it already is-

> how do think that tragic incident outside the

> corner shop last year got solved?) perhaps if you

> stamp your foot enough someone will take pity on

> you and pander to your demands.

bang out of order. Don't insult hillbillies.


monica Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Dontbesilly, The CCTV you refer to is the TFL

> camera not CCTV. I was chatting to some other

> forumites on the lane today, whilst drinking my

> oat cappuccino and flashing my black amex around.

> The other forumites think you are a hoot,

> absolutely hilarious, sad pathetic and hilarious.

> How silly of you to mistake a TFL camera for CCTV.

> You really are silly billy, or maybe you are a

> hillbilly.

monica Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Dontbesilly, The CCTV you refer to is the TFL

> camera not CCTV. I was chatting to some other

> forumites on the lane today, whilst drinking my

> oat cappuccino and flashing my black amex around.

> The other forumites think you are a hoot,

> absolutely hilarious, sad pathetic and hilarious.

> How silly of you to mistake a TFL camera for CCTV.

> You really are silly billy, or maybe you are a

> hillbilly.

> Now jog on back to the borders where you belong,

> don't forget the binocluars, so you can stare at

> ED lovingly, wantingly and lustfully.

> This is fun, sporting with the peasants

>

>


Well, you sound nice. Remind us of the name of that shop you own again?

  • 5 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Are there any other executors? Is the solicitor a soke practioner or part of a firm? Are you and your fellow beneficiaries behaving well?  You will want to take proper  legal advice (which this is not) but you can have an executor removed by the court if they are refusing to communicate with you. I would just do that. Tell him you are doing it, tell him you have reported him to the Law Society (if you have) and tell him you will be challenging his fees with the legal services ombudsman. This all sounds outrageous to me and this solicitor doesn't sound fit to practice. Three years sounds far too long for a low value estate comprising mostly of a house. He should have sold that or rented it out whilst he was waiting to administer the estate.    Sounds like he has cost you all a lot of money.  
    • Would wholeheartedly recommend Aria. Quality work, very responsive, lovely guy as well. 
    • A positive update from Southwark Council - “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.“  
    • A solicitor is acting as the executor for our late Aunt's will.  He only communicates by letter which is greatly lengthening the process.  The vast majority of legal people deal by modern means - the Electronic Communications Act that allows for much, if not all of these means is now 25 years old.   Any views and advice out there? In fuller detail: The value of the estate is not high.  There are a number of beneficiaries including one in the US.  It has taken almost three years and there is no end in sight.  The estate (house) is now damp, mouldy and wall paper falling off the wall. The solicitor is hostile, has threatened beneficiaries the police (which would just waste the police's time), and will not engage constructively. He only communicates by letter.  These are poorly written, curt or even hostile, in a language from the middle of last century, he clearly is typing these himself probably on a type writer.  Of course with every letter he makes more money. We've taken the first steps to complain either through the ombudsman and/or the SRA.  We have taken legal advice a couple of times, which of course isn't cheap, and were told that his behaviour is shocking and we'd be in our right to have him removed through the courts. But.... we just want him to get on with executing the will, primarily selling the house. However he refuses to use any other form of communication but letter.  So writing to the beneficiary in the 'States can take a month to get a reply. And even in this country a week or more. Having worked with lawyers in the past I am aware that email, tele and video conferencing and even text and WhatApp are appropriate means for communication.  There could be an immediate response to his questions.   Help!        
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...