Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Network Rail plan to terminate all northbound 'Wimbledon Loop' trains via Herne Hill, Loughborough Junction and Elephant & Castle at Blackfriars. No more through services to the city, Farrindgon, St Pancras and beyond; south London is already poorly served by public transport and this will make it considerably worse. There is a campaign to get National Rail to reconsider. Click on this link to see the details of the campaign: https://www.facebook.com/SaveTheThameslink and 'Like' to support them.

rahrahrah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Bare in mind that the alternative is currently a

> reduction of services from Peckham Rye / Denmark

> Hill.


I've not seen that in the documentation; do you have a link to that info?

LondonMix Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> There have been multiple threads with links to the

> consultation documents here on the forum. Do a

> search of Renata's posts as she has as Peckham's

> councillor has been very involved.


Thanks, I just did. Couldn't see anything on the alternative being a reduction of the Peckham Rye/Denmark Hill services, apart from this http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?5,933821,946508#msg-946508 which refutes it and no other mention of the Facebook campaign.

Here is the relevant thread http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?5,921668


The Wimbledon (Herne hill) loop is likely to be axed for logistics but they are campaigining against this. If they are sucessful, the Peckham service would have to go instead.




1865 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> LondonMix Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > There have been multiple threads with links to

> the

> > consultation documents here on the forum. Do

> a

> > search of Renata's posts as she has as

> Peckham's

> > councillor has been very involved.

>

> Thanks, I just did. Couldn't see anything on the

> alternative being a reduction of the Peckham

> Rye/Denmark Hill services, apart from this

> http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?5

> ,933821,946508#msg-946508 which refutes it and no

> other mention of the Facebook campaign.

this post about the Southwark Rail Users Group (SRUG) comments might also be useful to read: http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?5,944735,946714#msg-946714


SRUG's comments cover the issues raised by the Thameslink consultation for users of rail services from the stations Nunhead, Peckham Rye, Denmark Hill, North Dulwich, East Dulwich, Queens Rd Peckham, South Bermondsey. See here for copy of the comments: http://www.bellenden.net/sites/default/files/SRUG%20response%20to%20DfT%20Thameslink-Southern%20Franchise%20consultation%202012.pdf

Page 5 covers particularly the Wimbledon Loop questions.


It is important for users who value the direct connections to St Pancras from Nunhead, Peckham Rye or Denmark Hill to email their comments to DfT before 14 September, focussing on their use of the service and why it is valuable and important to them. All relevant weblinks are in the post mentioned above.

There's an article in today's "Southwark News" (Dulwich & Herne Hill edition) entitled "Huge public outcry adds extra time to train cut consultation". This includes the sentence "The service through Herne Hill, Elephant and Castle and Blackfriars into central London faces the axe from 2018 as part of a shake up of the [Thameslink] network - with services from Denmark Hill and Peckham Rye also facing uncertainty".


This is surely badly worded, if not misleading, since it could be interpreted as suggesting that the through London services from both Herne Hill and Denmark Hill could be axed, when, as I understand it, it would be only one of these two services that could be taken away, and then for operational reasons.

LondonMix Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Your right. It plays down the fact that the

> stations are actually comepeting with one another

> to maintain their services!


No not quite right. It may be that this is what Network Rail want us all to think. But there are questions about whether their case about a particular capacity limit is correct. See page 5 answers to Qs 18/19 in SRUG's submission for more info on this. http://www.bellenden.net/sites/default/files/SRUG%20response%20to%20DfT%20Thameslink-Southern%20Franchise%20consultation%202012.pdf I think more will begin to unfold on this point over the next few weeks.

I'm not sure if I have got this right, but isn't the ultimate aim to increase through traffic from London bridge to North London? That would likely benefit more people, I guess. It would certainly take alot of pressure off the Northern Line.


I've always been amazed at how poor the service from London Bridge to Farringdon is, for example. It should be linked up like Charing X - every 5 mins or so.

healey Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I've always been amazed at how poor the service

> from London Bridge to Farringdon is, for example.

> It should be linked up like Charing X - every 5

> mins or so.



Given as the only (sensible) route from London Bridge to Farringdon is via Charing Cross, that would result in the scrapping of every other North-South service through Charing Cross. Somehow, I can't see that one getting the thumbs up.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • These have reduced over the years, are "perfect" lives Round Robins being replaced by "perfect" lives Instagram posts where we see all year round how people portray their perfect lives ?    The point of this thread is that for the last few years, due to issues at the mail offices, we had delays to post over Christmas. Not really been flagged as an issue this year but I am still betting on the odd card, posted well before Christmas, arriving late January. 
    • Two subjects here.  Xmas cards,  We receive and send less of them.  One reason is that the cost of postage - although interestingly not as much as I thought say compared to 10 years ago (a little more than inflation).  Fun fact when inflation was double digits in the 70s cost of postage almost doubled in one year.  Postage is not a good indication of general inflation fluctuating a fair bit.  The huge rise in international postage that for a 20g Christmas card to Europe (no longer a 20g price, now have to do up to 100g), or a cheapskate 10g card to the 'States (again have to go up to the 100g price) , both around a quid in 2015, and now has more than doubled in real terms.  Cards exchanged with the US last year were arriving in the New Year.  Funnily enough they came much quicker this year.  So all my cards abroad were by email this year. The other reason we send less cards is that it was once a good opportunity to keep in touch with news.  I still personalise many cards with a news and for some a letter, and am a bit grumpy when I get a single line back,  Or worse a round robin about their perfect lives and families.  But most of us now communicate I expect primarily by WhatApp, email, FB etc.  No need for lightweight airmail envelope and paper in one.    The other subject is the mail as a whole. Privitisation appears to have done it no favours and the opening up of competition with restrictions on competing for parcel post with the new entrants.  Clearly unless you do special delivery there is a good chance that first class will not be delivered in a day as was expected in the past.   Should we have kept a public owned service subsidised by the tax payer?  You could also question how much lead on innovation was lost following the hiving off of the national telecommunications and mail network.
    • Why have I got a feeling there was also a connection with the beehive in Brixton on that road next to the gym
    • Ah, thanks,  it all comes flooding back. I've actually been to the Hastings shop, I'd forgotten all about it, along with her name! Didn't she (in between?)  take over what  was then The Magnolia, previously The Magdala, now The Lordship, with her then partner? Or is that some figment of my imagination?  In fact, didn't they transform it from The Magdala (much missed) to The Magnolia? With flowery wallpaper covering the front of the bar? Which reminds me of the pub's brief period after The Magnolia  as the ill-conceived and ill-fated The Patch.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...