Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Are you noticing it?! I am. Maybe it is increasing years but...


1. Any item of confectionery is about 70p.

2. Transport - constantly increasing. Eg tube pass 1990 for zones 1 and 2 was 364. I remember it as it was around a pound a day. Nowadays, a small fortune.

3. Haircuts - wash and bd around 30 quid at least.

4. Men's shoes. Church's used to be my husband's automatic choice. Now it is an investment for twenty years.

5. Starbucks or similar coffees.

6. A non snazzy night out eg a curry. 50 quid for two.

7. Don't even get me started on flats....

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/25295-inflation/
Share on other sites

1. Two tickets for a gig next month - ?340

2. Lunch most working days - ?7 (yes I could make my own but I can't be arsed)

3. ?45 today's lunch - two courses and half a bottle of wine at Franklins (it was nice though)


Some things have gone down in price. CDs, books, mobile phone bills, flights.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/25295-inflation/#findComment-572083
Share on other sites

Wow, those tickets are a lot.

Yes, I forgot lunch. Pret a manger sandwich: blt used to be around 1.89 and now is over 3 I think. An americano used to be under a pound.

Return plane tickets anywhere in the world used to be around 400 pounds.

Holidays have really gone up.


My husband's shirts have gone down in price though.... Not sure about suits.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/25295-inflation/#findComment-572123
Share on other sites

Flight prices seem to have been rising constantly for over 10 years. You could certainly get flights to various US destinations for under ?250 in the 90s.


Although prior to that, I think air travel had been getting progressively more affordable - culminating in the earlier days of Easyjet and Ryanair.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/25295-inflation/#findComment-572137
Share on other sites

Fuel prices account for some of it but not all.


The basic point is that I used not to think about certain purchases but I now do. Part of that is being older and wiser ok but part of it is that things are relatively much dearer.


Theatre tx - eye-watering these days, especially if you are taking a band of children...

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/25295-inflation/#findComment-572144
Share on other sites

Rather than speculate like a whole load of old people in a shop queue, why don't we just create a reasonably representative basket of goods and services and see how their price has changed over time. that'd be brilliant! Hang on a minute you mean there is one? That'd be the official inflation rate ; )
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/25295-inflation/#findComment-572167
Share on other sites

rent! (sorry DG2, we're not all rich on this forum, despite your protestation that you are poor!)


And I'm sorry but flights to Australia/NZ and Thailand were A lot more expensive 10 years ago. When I was 18 I travelled around Thailand and there was no way you were getting flights for less than 700. Now if you book early, flights to Bangkok can go as little as 350/400. You couldn't get to Australia either for less than a grand but again you can get them for around half that now if you book early.


Flights are not straight forward in any way because the more popular a route comes, the more flights going to that destination, the more competitive the prices. So it depends on the destination.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/25295-inflation/#findComment-572229
Share on other sites

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> quids - yes of course, but I think the

> conversation is more about things which have risen

> at above the inflation rate (or at least seem to

> have done). Fuel, transportation, and London

> property all being good examples.


Going beyond inflation rate means there are some extra hands involved that exploits the opportunity. This happens when people take unnecessary benefits and the food chain goes on. The market forces also sometimes gather up to enjoy the joint benefits of the unawareness of consumers

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/25295-inflation/#findComment-572237
Share on other sites

zeban Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> And I'm sorry but flights to Australia/NZ and

> Thailand were A lot more expensive 10 years ago.

> When I was 18 I travelled around Thailand and

> there was no way you were getting flights for less

> than 700. Now if you book early, flights to

> Bangkok can go as little as 350/400. You couldn't

> get to Australia either for less than a grand but

> again you can get them for around half that now if

> you book early.


Actually, back around 1990 it used to cost about ?750 on average for me to to fly to Oz (which I do every year or two). It still does cost that. Pretty much zero increase in 20 years, which is a huge fall in real terms.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/25295-inflation/#findComment-572269
Share on other sites

Loz, from the thread it seems that flights have gone up massively (zeban's era) and then down again...during my era, 400 quid did it.


????, goodness, yes. Rpi what a concept. What do borrowers actually pay these days though? My understanding is that it is a massive margin over LIBOR in most cases. So, v low base rates have not filtered through I think repeat think. Qed, rpi is actually more accurate than one noting extremrly low rates might think.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/25295-inflation/#findComment-572295
Share on other sites

Even back in the mid-90's you could get to Oz for ?399 (Britannia Air... oh, God... never again.). I have made the flight every year or two for the last 20-odd years and, really, the price has not really changed one iota in that time. The only time I have ever paid over a grand or even ?900 for economy is a booking for a December/Xmas journey, when all prices go silly unless you get your booking in early around January.
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/25295-inflation/#findComment-572298
Share on other sites

Brendan Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'm sure beer was less than ?2 a pint 10 years ago.


Only in a Wetherspoons, perhaps.


I worked in a pub in 1991 and a pint of Kronenberg was ?1.65. Mind you that was not the cheapest of pubs. I think others in London were charging about ?1.40-?1.50 at the time. Out in the sticks was even cheaper.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/25295-inflation/#findComment-572321
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • In what way? Maybe it just felt more intelligent and considered coming directly after Question Time, which was a barely watchable bun fight.
    • Yes, all this. Totally Sephiroth. The electorate wants to see transformation overnight. That's not possible. But what is possible is leading with the right comms strategy, which isn't cutting through. As I've said before, messaging matters more now than policy, that's the only way to bring the electorate with you. And I worry that that's how Reform's going to get into power.  And the media LOVES Reform. 
    • “There was an excellent discussion on Newscast last night between the BBC Political Editor, the director of the IFS and the director of More In Common - all highly intelligent people with no party political agenda ” I would call this “generous”   Labour should never have made that tax promise because, as with - duh - Brexit, it’s pretending the real world doesn’t exist now. I blame Labour in no small part for this delusion. But the electorate need to cop on as well.  They think they can have everything they want without responsibilities, costs or attachments. The media encourage this  Labour do need to raise taxes. The country needs it.  Now, exactly how it’s done remains to be seen. But if people are just going to go around going “la la laffer curve. Liars! String em up! Vote someone else” then they just aren’t serious people reckoning with the problem yes Labour are more than a year into their term, but after 14 years of what the Tories  did? Whoever takes over, has a major problem 
    • Messaging, messaging, messaging. That's all it boils down to. There are only so many fiscal policies out there, and they're there for the taking, no matter which party you're in. I hate to say it, but Farage gets it right every time. Even when Reform reneges on fiscal policy, it does it with enough confidence and candidness that no one is wringing their hands. Instead, they're quietly admired for their pragmatism. Strangely, it's exactly the same as Labour has done, with its manifesto reverse on income tax, but it's going to bomb.  Blaming the Tories / Brexit / Covid / Putin ... none of it washes with the public anymore  - it wants to be sold a vision of the future, not reminded of the disasters of the past. Labour put itself on the back foot with its 'the tories fucked it all up' stance right at the beginning of its tenure.  All Lammy had to do (as with Reeves and Raynor etc) was say 'mea culpa. We've made a mistake, we'll fix it. Sorry guys, we're on it'. But instead it's 'nothing to see here / it's someone else's fault / I was buying a suit / hadn't been briefed yet'.  And, of course, the press smells blood, which never helps.  Oh! And Reeve's speech on Wednesday was so drab and predictable that even the journalists at the press conference couldn't really be arsed to come up with any challenging questions. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...