Jump to content

Recommended Posts

JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> This is a description of the Kinnock visit - he

> kept his distance.

>

> https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2020/mar/29/s

> tephen-kinnock-targeted-by-police-for-visiting-fat

> her-neil

>

> The thing is the arrogance wasn't there he knew he

> had got away with it - you'd think Neil would look

> after himself still (and Glenys) :).

It was the 28th March....5 days after the start of the lockdown proper (23rd March), and what about the others- Ali, Evans? Kier Starmer is just a hypocrite

Khans is basically a free-for-all.

They have some black and yellow sticky tape on the floor and the guys serving might be wearing gloves, but that's as far as it goes - after that you're on your own.

Customers squeezing up behind you in the aisles, leaning over you from behind to get parsley when you're looking at the aubergines, if you're loading-up at the till someone behind you waiting may well ignore the sticky tape markers on floor and be stood inches behind you, that kind of stuff.

The younger lads associated with the store or it's staff, are wandering around aimlessly with their heads in their phones oblivious to (or ignoring) customers' presence stuck behind them in aisles.

If you're going there, manage your expectations with this; there's no space, no distance keeping, no enforcement.

I go twice a week.


gabys1st Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> to Khans twice a week.

> .......What precautions are Kahns taking re social

> distancing etc?

Sephiroth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Starmer is not leading the country (not yet

> anyway)

>

> Don?t you get it. People follow the government

> message and actions. And there is the problem.


I personally get 'it' fine- people in the media and on the ED forum follow whatever the lefty, anti-government message is at that moment in time.

And the other people who don't even listen to the government, i.e. scientific message, do exactly what they want.

To your earlier post, even Cummings didn't use the excuse that he was following Kinnock's lead. Shocking that your are even suggesting that a back bencher has as much importance as the bloke who de facto runs the government. A bit of a play ground argument, nah nah nah nah. As for lefties in East Dulwich, a Labour government would come under stick too if and when they get into power. Not as much as the Cummings government as there will be less things to dislike. But would still be subject to scrutiny and criticism from us champagne socialists.

Talking of a Labour Government - Blair has been going on about ID cards again but this time globally and digitally to help recovery from Covid-19.


https://www.thenational.ae/world/tony-blair-calls-for-global-digital-ids-to-drive-recovery-from-coronavirus-shutdown-1.1031262

uncleglen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sephiroth Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Starmer is not leading the country (not yet

> > anyway)

> >

> > Don?t you get it. People follow the government

> > message and actions. And there is the problem.

>

> I personally get 'it' fine- people in the media

> and on the ED forum follow whatever the lefty,

> anti-government message is at that moment in

> time.

> And the other people who don't even listen to the

> government, i.e. scientific message, do exactly

> what they want.


LOL but who makes the left wing message we all follow, who is this world leader ? I suspect I can guess who it is.

ianr Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> > Why go when you know it?s not enforcing

> regulations?

>

> There's no 2 metre distancing regulation in

> England.

> http://www.legislation.gov.uk/all?title=Coronaviru

> s&text=%222%20metres%22


Problem is - is it "advice" or is it "must" - confusing


If a policeman gives you a fixed penalty fine - what you gonna do though if it's that second bit below - could mean anything.


"The new fines, introduced on Thursday, can be imposed on anyone who refuses to follow a police instruction to go home if they are in a gathering of more than two people - or conducting themselves in a way that will increase the likelihood of spreading the virus to others."


(back in march though)


https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-52066145

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I can't, but I'm sure ChatGPT could, if you ask it! With Windows 11, you can share documents, eg with work colleagues, via a setting. Probably it's the same with iPads etc and the solicitor has accidentally or deliberately shared it with your friend? I'm sure the solicitor can explain it if asked. Hopefully it wasn't an accident!
    • Yes of course a lot of it is total bollocks. And of course the House of Lords is ridiculous. But the class system etc isn't because we have a "royal family", is it?
    • Can't remember where I got them, online somewhere recommended by my daughter, but they are cloth and brightly coloured and fit quite tightly around my nose and mouth. I've still got a stock of them. Tissues inside might help a bit,  but if you have a very runny nose you basically need to keep removing the mask to blow it. Luckily I have only had to go out once when I've had  a bad cold. Sorry, probably too much information.
    • To be fair to Royalists, it didn't work out too well for anyone last time we canned the monarchy. I'd imagine quite a few French, Germans, Spanish, Portuguese and Russians had second thoughts after they' found out what you get in their place - those really didn't work out well. Maybe elected heads of state only work well where there's never been a monarchy. The countries I'd aspire to - the Scandinavian states, The Netherlands - have slimmed down monarchies, and that looks like the way we're moving. I'd take that and abolition of an unelected upper house, most particularly the hereditary element of it, as a decent starting point.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...