Jump to content

Recommended Posts

JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> This is a description of the Kinnock visit - he

> kept his distance.

>

> https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2020/mar/29/s

> tephen-kinnock-targeted-by-police-for-visiting-fat

> her-neil

>

> The thing is the arrogance wasn't there he knew he

> had got away with it - you'd think Neil would look

> after himself still (and Glenys) :).

It was the 28th March....5 days after the start of the lockdown proper (23rd March), and what about the others- Ali, Evans? Kier Starmer is just a hypocrite

Khans is basically a free-for-all.

They have some black and yellow sticky tape on the floor and the guys serving might be wearing gloves, but that's as far as it goes - after that you're on your own.

Customers squeezing up behind you in the aisles, leaning over you from behind to get parsley when you're looking at the aubergines, if you're loading-up at the till someone behind you waiting may well ignore the sticky tape markers on floor and be stood inches behind you, that kind of stuff.

The younger lads associated with the store or it's staff, are wandering around aimlessly with their heads in their phones oblivious to (or ignoring) customers' presence stuck behind them in aisles.

If you're going there, manage your expectations with this; there's no space, no distance keeping, no enforcement.

I go twice a week.


gabys1st Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> to Khans twice a week.

> .......What precautions are Kahns taking re social

> distancing etc?

Sephiroth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Starmer is not leading the country (not yet

> anyway)

>

> Don?t you get it. People follow the government

> message and actions. And there is the problem.


I personally get 'it' fine- people in the media and on the ED forum follow whatever the lefty, anti-government message is at that moment in time.

And the other people who don't even listen to the government, i.e. scientific message, do exactly what they want.

To your earlier post, even Cummings didn't use the excuse that he was following Kinnock's lead. Shocking that your are even suggesting that a back bencher has as much importance as the bloke who de facto runs the government. A bit of a play ground argument, nah nah nah nah. As for lefties in East Dulwich, a Labour government would come under stick too if and when they get into power. Not as much as the Cummings government as there will be less things to dislike. But would still be subject to scrutiny and criticism from us champagne socialists.

Talking of a Labour Government - Blair has been going on about ID cards again but this time globally and digitally to help recovery from Covid-19.


https://www.thenational.ae/world/tony-blair-calls-for-global-digital-ids-to-drive-recovery-from-coronavirus-shutdown-1.1031262

uncleglen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sephiroth Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Starmer is not leading the country (not yet

> > anyway)

> >

> > Don?t you get it. People follow the government

> > message and actions. And there is the problem.

>

> I personally get 'it' fine- people in the media

> and on the ED forum follow whatever the lefty,

> anti-government message is at that moment in

> time.

> And the other people who don't even listen to the

> government, i.e. scientific message, do exactly

> what they want.


LOL but who makes the left wing message we all follow, who is this world leader ? I suspect I can guess who it is.

ianr Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> > Why go when you know it?s not enforcing

> regulations?

>

> There's no 2 metre distancing regulation in

> England.

> http://www.legislation.gov.uk/all?title=Coronaviru

> s&text=%222%20metres%22


Problem is - is it "advice" or is it "must" - confusing


If a policeman gives you a fixed penalty fine - what you gonna do though if it's that second bit below - could mean anything.


"The new fines, introduced on Thursday, can be imposed on anyone who refuses to follow a police instruction to go home if they are in a gathering of more than two people - or conducting themselves in a way that will increase the likelihood of spreading the virus to others."


(back in march though)


https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-52066145

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I don't know all this. Children are starting school and people are scared because the children might be attacked by asylum seekers? What do you think spray painting St George flags does to make children safer? The flag campaign has absolutely nothing to do with patriotism, or about addressing male violence (many of those behind the campaign have violent criminal records themselves). It's about xenophobia, fear, and intimidation. 
    • The issue, with children starting school again, is that there is an unknown risk, and people want to know their children are safe, which they do not. You know all of this, I don’t need to attempt to outline the views for you as it’s widely available.  There is outrage at how some people are behaving. Did you not see women attacking a man being interviewed? As with all things, the actions of a few is damaging.
    • What priority are asylum seekers being given over the community?  Whilst it's terrible that a girl has been assaulted, why are the criminal actions of an individual being seen as reason to attack a whole group of people? Many of those involved in the 'raise the colours' campaign have criminal histories, including domestic violence. Perhaps there should also be community outrage at that, instead of those people apparently being lionised as 'patriots'. There is a very clear attempt by the like of Farage etc. (who contributed significantly to the current 'crisis') to stir up unrest. The flag campaign has absolutely nothing to do with patriotism. I don't think anyone believes it does. 
    • All to do with the issues in Essex, with a child allegedly assaulted by and asylum seeker residing in a local hotel, ensuing community outrage, particularly with asylum seekers given priority over the community. The whole thing is toxic. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...