Jump to content

Recommended Posts

JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> This is a description of the Kinnock visit - he

> kept his distance.

>

> https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2020/mar/29/s

> tephen-kinnock-targeted-by-police-for-visiting-fat

> her-neil

>

> The thing is the arrogance wasn't there he knew he

> had got away with it - you'd think Neil would look

> after himself still (and Glenys) :).

It was the 28th March....5 days after the start of the lockdown proper (23rd March), and what about the others- Ali, Evans? Kier Starmer is just a hypocrite

Khans is basically a free-for-all.

They have some black and yellow sticky tape on the floor and the guys serving might be wearing gloves, but that's as far as it goes - after that you're on your own.

Customers squeezing up behind you in the aisles, leaning over you from behind to get parsley when you're looking at the aubergines, if you're loading-up at the till someone behind you waiting may well ignore the sticky tape markers on floor and be stood inches behind you, that kind of stuff.

The younger lads associated with the store or it's staff, are wandering around aimlessly with their heads in their phones oblivious to (or ignoring) customers' presence stuck behind them in aisles.

If you're going there, manage your expectations with this; there's no space, no distance keeping, no enforcement.

I go twice a week.


gabys1st Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> to Khans twice a week.

> .......What precautions are Kahns taking re social

> distancing etc?

Sephiroth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Starmer is not leading the country (not yet

> anyway)

>

> Don?t you get it. People follow the government

> message and actions. And there is the problem.


I personally get 'it' fine- people in the media and on the ED forum follow whatever the lefty, anti-government message is at that moment in time.

And the other people who don't even listen to the government, i.e. scientific message, do exactly what they want.

To your earlier post, even Cummings didn't use the excuse that he was following Kinnock's lead. Shocking that your are even suggesting that a back bencher has as much importance as the bloke who de facto runs the government. A bit of a play ground argument, nah nah nah nah. As for lefties in East Dulwich, a Labour government would come under stick too if and when they get into power. Not as much as the Cummings government as there will be less things to dislike. But would still be subject to scrutiny and criticism from us champagne socialists.

Talking of a Labour Government - Blair has been going on about ID cards again but this time globally and digitally to help recovery from Covid-19.


https://www.thenational.ae/world/tony-blair-calls-for-global-digital-ids-to-drive-recovery-from-coronavirus-shutdown-1.1031262

uncleglen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sephiroth Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Starmer is not leading the country (not yet

> > anyway)

> >

> > Don?t you get it. People follow the government

> > message and actions. And there is the problem.

>

> I personally get 'it' fine- people in the media

> and on the ED forum follow whatever the lefty,

> anti-government message is at that moment in

> time.

> And the other people who don't even listen to the

> government, i.e. scientific message, do exactly

> what they want.


LOL but who makes the left wing message we all follow, who is this world leader ? I suspect I can guess who it is.

ianr Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> > Why go when you know it?s not enforcing

> regulations?

>

> There's no 2 metre distancing regulation in

> England.

> http://www.legislation.gov.uk/all?title=Coronaviru

> s&text=%222%20metres%22


Problem is - is it "advice" or is it "must" - confusing


If a policeman gives you a fixed penalty fine - what you gonna do though if it's that second bit below - could mean anything.


"The new fines, introduced on Thursday, can be imposed on anyone who refuses to follow a police instruction to go home if they are in a gathering of more than two people - or conducting themselves in a way that will increase the likelihood of spreading the virus to others."


(back in march though)


https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-52066145

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • It's regrettable that impact of the various topics of immigration have escalated to the level that people have to protest their unhappiness and that laws have to be rewritten, and yet people complain that those protesting are racist.       
    • I remember in the 70s the Union Jack was similarly appropriated by the National Front and later the British Party, I regarded it in the same way many perceive the St George's flag today. The Union Jack went through a period of rehabilitation in the 90s and probably viewed more positively by the left today. I wonder though if the anti immigration groups who have appropriated the St George;s flag realise that St George was born in what is modern day Turkey.
    • Certainly there are issues with  immigration which need to be addressed, but setting fire to buildings with immigrants in them is not the way to address them. Many (not all) of these people are fleeing from terrible situations in their own countries, and I can't even imagine what it must be like to finally reach somewhere where they hope they will be safe only to be "greeted" with violence and hostility. It makes me ashamed to be English, not proud. And yes, some of these people are here illegally, some of them are criminals or perpetrate attacks on women or whatever. And are dealt with accordingly. I read recently, and I don't know if it is true, that over 60% of the men arrested at the scene of attacks on immigrants and their temporary homes have previous convictions for  or are known to the police for domestic violence. Maybe look at yourselves first, eh, before trying to imply that because a few  immigrants commit a crime here therefore they are all criminals and shouldn't be allowed into our country. Why would someone fly the English flag in the present climate for any reason apart from being anti immigration?  What is a very unhealthy view? Are you replying to me? Yes the immigration law badly needs to be amended. I completely agree. I don't think I've said anything which implies otherwise?
    • That’s a very unhealthy view.  Particularly when the very top echelons admit that the immigration law is out of date and not relevant and is being amended as we speak.    
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...