Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Are you sure this isn't a bad dream Mic ?


And anyway, how could they pooooossibly bring that ol' stuff up to date


Sue Ellen would be in rehab for a start (she's still in it isn't she) & JR would be at an equal right tribunal in no time



For some reason i've got Dallas crossed with Dukes of hazard in my head



Weird I know

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/25467-dallas/#findComment-574539
Share on other sites

I chuckled at the guardian tv review (though I'm sure grace dent would have been funnier)


"There's no sign of Pamela, probably for the best. She ? Victoria Principal ? was the first woman I ever really loved, and it might not be the same. But here's Sue Ellen (Linda Gray), looking ? good, though a bit weird. She's not saying much, and when she does her face doesn't move, as if she's been cryogenically frozen from the neck upwards and they don't totally thaw her out for filming in case she wilts, or her face explodes into a cloud of dust.


And JR ? Larry Hagman ? himself. Is that really him, sitting in that chair? Or Father Jack? He's clinically depressed, says the nurse in the home. Clinically deceased, I'd say. Well, perhaps there's the tiniest flicker in those eyes, under those magnificent silver bushes, but it hardly looks like the oil-fired furnace that was the driving force of this show for 13 years."

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/25467-dallas/#findComment-574671
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • It’s a 4 year old on a bike do you really think he is going 15mph. Grown adults complaining about a child who probably isn’t able to string a few sentences together says a lot about the people in this forum. If this member was hit from behind the father was probably walking behind the bike so I don’t get the point of stretching out an overreaction from a child in Nursery bumping into you. Grow up Obviously a four year old should be cycling on the pavement.
    • Malumbu,  if none of us were there, does that mean that nobody should post anything on here unless they have witnesses from the EDF? Why would someone post something like this if it  wasn't true? This is not about whether children should or should not be cycling on the pavement. There are specific issues. a) the child was out of sight of the person supposed to be caring for him b) he appears to have been  either not looking where he was going or was out of control of the bike c) if he did see that he was about to hit someone  he apparently did not give them any kind of warning  d)  a person was unexpectedly hit from behind whilst just walking along, which in my view makes him a victim e) does the title of the thread really matter as the issue was described in the first post?  f) nobody is blaming the child, they are blaming the person who should have been watching him g) do you really think it was acceptable for that person to find the situation funny? The OP was not complaining about the 4 year old. They were complaining about an adult's lack of supervision of a 4 year old who was not capable of riding a bike and who hit someone from behind with no warning. Also, apart from reading the OP more carefully, perhaps also choose your words more carefully. Jobless? Lunatic? Charming.
    • Completely jobless and lunatic behaviour coming on a forum and complaining about a 4 year old and the child’s bike riding skills. Honestly grow up
    • I have to say, I too am upset about the passing of DulwichFox. He was a real local character, who unlike me, managed to stick with ED despite all of the nauseous yuppification of the last three decades. R.I.P to foxy    Louisa. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...