Jump to content

Recommended Posts

mrwb Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Twitter itself needs to be uninvented. It's an

> absolutely awful method of communication.

>

> Very much become a big part of what has gone so

> terribly wrong with our civilization.


Totally agree. And there are so many people more dangerous than KH on Twitter. Bad combination.

? Totally agree. And there are so many people more dangerous than KH on Twitter?.


Springtime, I?m curious too (not being a Twatter user), what names are more dangerous than Katie Hopkins on this social media tool. Or were you just saying it not actually knowing whether it?s true or not ?

I don?t mind either way, but it just seems a weird thing to suggest without backing up, especially when asked.

Hands up everyone - who believs tomdhu genuinely isn't aware of Hopkins and some of the thinsg she's written?


Anyone as anti-eu as tomdhu will be well aware of the online opinions and campaigns


this whole "I voted leave for genuine reasons and shucks gee I don't even know anyone who holds vile opinions" is so disingenuous as to be insulting


https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-4633332/KATIE-HOPKINS-stand-strong-Brexit.html


https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2015/04/18/katie-hopkins-russell-bra_n_7091674.html

Hey, relax, hold on a while. I admit I may be a bit of a dinosaur. I go back to before the EU/EEC/ECSC existed and no doubt way before you were even a glint in your mother's eye.


I don't do social media. Don't read the Daily Mail or the Hufington Post and I can honestly say Katie Hopkins has not appeared on my radar. But now you have flagged her up, I shall do a Google.

KidKruger Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ? Totally agree. And there are so many people more

> dangerous than KH on Twitter?.

>

> Springtime, I?m curious too (not being a Twatter

> user), what names are more dangerous than Katie

> Hopkins on this social media tool. Or were you

> just saying it not actually knowing whether it?s

> true or not ?

> I don?t mind either way, but it just seems a weird

> thing to suggest without backing up, especially

> when asked.



Bolsonaro, Netanyahu, Trump, Modi, bin Salman, Chinese govt., etc. All scum.

tomdhu Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hey, relax, hold on a while. I admit I may be a

> bit of a dinosaur. I go back to before the

> EU/EEC/ECSC existed and no doubt way before you

> were even a glint in your mother's eye.

>

> I don't do social media. Don't read the Daily Mail

> or the Hufington Post and I can honestly say Katie

> Hopkins has not appeared on my radar. But now you

> have flagged her up, I shall do a Google.


Quite refreshing. Of course we do do social media as we are on this site, but so often it is who gives a frigg what is trending on Twitter

SpringTime Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I don't know if Glen's on twitter. He wouldn't be

> in Camp Hopkins though. Too sympathetic.


I just googled her twitter comments and I wished I had followed her on twitter- she needed some support. I knew very little about her as I don't follow any of the rubbish on the anti-social media since the ED has enough to reassure me that the blinkers are still there

tomdhu Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Did a Google, and she's not exactly a "looker" is

> she? Could be a bit grim without all the slap on.



She once put on about 4 stone and lost it again to prove that overweight people have themselves to blame.


She then got touchy about the photos of her looking 4 stone heavier.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • But I don't think that was what you meant, was it? But he can hardly be held responsible for what somebody else did!
    • But it was under our electoral system in 2019! This must be part of the right-wing media conspiracy that did for Corbyn....;-) Corbyn was very closely allied to Unite and Len....
    • Goose Green Ward Panel Meeting   Date: 24th of July 2025, 7pm Location: East Dulwich Picturehouse | 116A Lordship Lane | London SE22 8HD    Safer Neighbourhoods Team (SNT) will be holding a ward panel meeting at East Dulwich Picturehouse on Thursday 24th July 2025 from 7pm. Please come along to talk about the priorities for the community and how local police can help.  
    • Eh? That wasn't "my quote"! If you look at your post above,it is clearly a quote by Rockets! None of us have any  idea what a Corbyn led government during Covid would have been like. But do you seriously think it would have been worse than Johnson's self-serving performance? What you say about the swing of seats away from Labour in 2019 is true. But you have missed my point completely. The fact that Labour under Corbyn got more than ten million votes does not mean that Corbyn was "unelectable", does it? The present electoral system is bonkers, which is why a change is apparently on the cards. Anyway, it is pointless discussing this, because we are going round in circles. As for McCluskey, whatever the truth of that report, I can't see what it has to do with Corbyn?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...