Jump to content

Recommended Posts

mrwb Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Twitter itself needs to be uninvented. It's an

> absolutely awful method of communication.

>

> Very much become a big part of what has gone so

> terribly wrong with our civilization.


Totally agree. And there are so many people more dangerous than KH on Twitter. Bad combination.

? Totally agree. And there are so many people more dangerous than KH on Twitter?.


Springtime, I?m curious too (not being a Twatter user), what names are more dangerous than Katie Hopkins on this social media tool. Or were you just saying it not actually knowing whether it?s true or not ?

I don?t mind either way, but it just seems a weird thing to suggest without backing up, especially when asked.

Hands up everyone - who believs tomdhu genuinely isn't aware of Hopkins and some of the thinsg she's written?


Anyone as anti-eu as tomdhu will be well aware of the online opinions and campaigns


this whole "I voted leave for genuine reasons and shucks gee I don't even know anyone who holds vile opinions" is so disingenuous as to be insulting


https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-4633332/KATIE-HOPKINS-stand-strong-Brexit.html


https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2015/04/18/katie-hopkins-russell-bra_n_7091674.html

Hey, relax, hold on a while. I admit I may be a bit of a dinosaur. I go back to before the EU/EEC/ECSC existed and no doubt way before you were even a glint in your mother's eye.


I don't do social media. Don't read the Daily Mail or the Hufington Post and I can honestly say Katie Hopkins has not appeared on my radar. But now you have flagged her up, I shall do a Google.

KidKruger Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ? Totally agree. And there are so many people more

> dangerous than KH on Twitter?.

>

> Springtime, I?m curious too (not being a Twatter

> user), what names are more dangerous than Katie

> Hopkins on this social media tool. Or were you

> just saying it not actually knowing whether it?s

> true or not ?

> I don?t mind either way, but it just seems a weird

> thing to suggest without backing up, especially

> when asked.



Bolsonaro, Netanyahu, Trump, Modi, bin Salman, Chinese govt., etc. All scum.

tomdhu Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hey, relax, hold on a while. I admit I may be a

> bit of a dinosaur. I go back to before the

> EU/EEC/ECSC existed and no doubt way before you

> were even a glint in your mother's eye.

>

> I don't do social media. Don't read the Daily Mail

> or the Hufington Post and I can honestly say Katie

> Hopkins has not appeared on my radar. But now you

> have flagged her up, I shall do a Google.


Quite refreshing. Of course we do do social media as we are on this site, but so often it is who gives a frigg what is trending on Twitter

SpringTime Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I don't know if Glen's on twitter. He wouldn't be

> in Camp Hopkins though. Too sympathetic.


I just googled her twitter comments and I wished I had followed her on twitter- she needed some support. I knew very little about her as I don't follow any of the rubbish on the anti-social media since the ED has enough to reassure me that the blinkers are still there

tomdhu Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Did a Google, and she's not exactly a "looker" is

> she? Could be a bit grim without all the slap on.



She once put on about 4 stone and lost it again to prove that overweight people have themselves to blame.


She then got touchy about the photos of her looking 4 stone heavier.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • "You have no idea why"   To be fair Sue, it's blindingly obvious to anyone who has a conversation with anyone who isn't a Corbyn supporter. And even some who liked Corbyn (like me initially) found him somewhat flaky even at his most popular But let's say you are right and I have NO idea why anybody might not vote for him. They still didn't vote for him. He lost two elections. The second one badly (and strongly predicted but the stubborn old goat wouldn't budge so we we were stuck with Johnson and another 3 million PMs in the 5 years that followed) So even with ZERO evidence, we have our eyes and ears and brains But we do have evidence   https://yougov.co.uk/politics/articles/27022-their-own-words-why-voters-abandoned-labour
    • As I said, it was my understanding. I worded it very carefully. I didn't/don't know for sure, so clearly not a fact. And hardly an "opinion", which is something completely different. You have no idea what reason anybody might have had for not voting for him (unless you can point to some opinion poll results which actually asked people?)
    • Also, just to add, the threat to kill someone's dog and try to kick it, is an additional extremely unpleasant layer. I have noticed a lot of the burst water balloons lying around in the park too- that is not great for the environment either.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...