Jump to content

Recommended Posts

mrwb Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Twitter itself needs to be uninvented. It's an

> absolutely awful method of communication.

>

> Very much become a big part of what has gone so

> terribly wrong with our civilization.


Totally agree. And there are so many people more dangerous than KH on Twitter. Bad combination.

? Totally agree. And there are so many people more dangerous than KH on Twitter?.


Springtime, I?m curious too (not being a Twatter user), what names are more dangerous than Katie Hopkins on this social media tool. Or were you just saying it not actually knowing whether it?s true or not ?

I don?t mind either way, but it just seems a weird thing to suggest without backing up, especially when asked.

Hands up everyone - who believs tomdhu genuinely isn't aware of Hopkins and some of the thinsg she's written?


Anyone as anti-eu as tomdhu will be well aware of the online opinions and campaigns


this whole "I voted leave for genuine reasons and shucks gee I don't even know anyone who holds vile opinions" is so disingenuous as to be insulting


https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-4633332/KATIE-HOPKINS-stand-strong-Brexit.html


https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2015/04/18/katie-hopkins-russell-bra_n_7091674.html

Hey, relax, hold on a while. I admit I may be a bit of a dinosaur. I go back to before the EU/EEC/ECSC existed and no doubt way before you were even a glint in your mother's eye.


I don't do social media. Don't read the Daily Mail or the Hufington Post and I can honestly say Katie Hopkins has not appeared on my radar. But now you have flagged her up, I shall do a Google.

KidKruger Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ? Totally agree. And there are so many people more

> dangerous than KH on Twitter?.

>

> Springtime, I?m curious too (not being a Twatter

> user), what names are more dangerous than Katie

> Hopkins on this social media tool. Or were you

> just saying it not actually knowing whether it?s

> true or not ?

> I don?t mind either way, but it just seems a weird

> thing to suggest without backing up, especially

> when asked.



Bolsonaro, Netanyahu, Trump, Modi, bin Salman, Chinese govt., etc. All scum.

tomdhu Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hey, relax, hold on a while. I admit I may be a

> bit of a dinosaur. I go back to before the

> EU/EEC/ECSC existed and no doubt way before you

> were even a glint in your mother's eye.

>

> I don't do social media. Don't read the Daily Mail

> or the Hufington Post and I can honestly say Katie

> Hopkins has not appeared on my radar. But now you

> have flagged her up, I shall do a Google.


Quite refreshing. Of course we do do social media as we are on this site, but so often it is who gives a frigg what is trending on Twitter

SpringTime Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I don't know if Glen's on twitter. He wouldn't be

> in Camp Hopkins though. Too sympathetic.


I just googled her twitter comments and I wished I had followed her on twitter- she needed some support. I knew very little about her as I don't follow any of the rubbish on the anti-social media since the ED has enough to reassure me that the blinkers are still there

tomdhu Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Did a Google, and she's not exactly a "looker" is

> she? Could be a bit grim without all the slap on.



She once put on about 4 stone and lost it again to prove that overweight people have themselves to blame.


She then got touchy about the photos of her looking 4 stone heavier.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • If you see him again,  please tell him that it's not working!
    • I spoke to a sound engineer at Piermont and he mentioned the software they use which tries to absorb the sound into the landscape
    • I think we're probably closest - about 50m from one of the tents - and to be honest it's not that bad. The bass is making the windows vibrate but it's not 'noisy' I've always said the loud music is the least of the issues to me. It's the construction for two weeks before / one week after, the imposing steel wall, the trodden in non-decomposing litter (fag butts, cable ties, vapes, bottle tops, ring pulls) which will cover the entire site forever, the compaction & damage to the grass which takes months to recover, the impact on birds, bats & wildlife of 24/7 lights, the anti social behaviour of so many attendees (p***ing on the streets and in the bushes) and this year the blatant extending of the site footprint, despite previously giving the reason they can't move it is because it's been designed for that location. And hopefully everyone can see this for what it really is - an attempt to win over the local community and set a precedent for four festival days, so that they have a stronger argument when they put in an application for six days again next year.  Southwark state that the money from Gala goes directly to supporting their Events dept, who support "up to 100 free events every year". So what are these free events, and why do we need another? 
    • Found now. All safe.   Found now!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...