Jump to content

Recommended Posts

mrwb Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Twitter itself needs to be uninvented. It's an

> absolutely awful method of communication.

>

> Very much become a big part of what has gone so

> terribly wrong with our civilization.


Totally agree. And there are so many people more dangerous than KH on Twitter. Bad combination.

? Totally agree. And there are so many people more dangerous than KH on Twitter?.


Springtime, I?m curious too (not being a Twatter user), what names are more dangerous than Katie Hopkins on this social media tool. Or were you just saying it not actually knowing whether it?s true or not ?

I don?t mind either way, but it just seems a weird thing to suggest without backing up, especially when asked.

Hands up everyone - who believs tomdhu genuinely isn't aware of Hopkins and some of the thinsg she's written?


Anyone as anti-eu as tomdhu will be well aware of the online opinions and campaigns


this whole "I voted leave for genuine reasons and shucks gee I don't even know anyone who holds vile opinions" is so disingenuous as to be insulting


https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-4633332/KATIE-HOPKINS-stand-strong-Brexit.html


https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2015/04/18/katie-hopkins-russell-bra_n_7091674.html

Hey, relax, hold on a while. I admit I may be a bit of a dinosaur. I go back to before the EU/EEC/ECSC existed and no doubt way before you were even a glint in your mother's eye.


I don't do social media. Don't read the Daily Mail or the Hufington Post and I can honestly say Katie Hopkins has not appeared on my radar. But now you have flagged her up, I shall do a Google.

KidKruger Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ? Totally agree. And there are so many people more

> dangerous than KH on Twitter?.

>

> Springtime, I?m curious too (not being a Twatter

> user), what names are more dangerous than Katie

> Hopkins on this social media tool. Or were you

> just saying it not actually knowing whether it?s

> true or not ?

> I don?t mind either way, but it just seems a weird

> thing to suggest without backing up, especially

> when asked.



Bolsonaro, Netanyahu, Trump, Modi, bin Salman, Chinese govt., etc. All scum.

tomdhu Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hey, relax, hold on a while. I admit I may be a

> bit of a dinosaur. I go back to before the

> EU/EEC/ECSC existed and no doubt way before you

> were even a glint in your mother's eye.

>

> I don't do social media. Don't read the Daily Mail

> or the Hufington Post and I can honestly say Katie

> Hopkins has not appeared on my radar. But now you

> have flagged her up, I shall do a Google.


Quite refreshing. Of course we do do social media as we are on this site, but so often it is who gives a frigg what is trending on Twitter

SpringTime Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I don't know if Glen's on twitter. He wouldn't be

> in Camp Hopkins though. Too sympathetic.


I just googled her twitter comments and I wished I had followed her on twitter- she needed some support. I knew very little about her as I don't follow any of the rubbish on the anti-social media since the ED has enough to reassure me that the blinkers are still there

tomdhu Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Did a Google, and she's not exactly a "looker" is

> she? Could be a bit grim without all the slap on.



She once put on about 4 stone and lost it again to prove that overweight people have themselves to blame.


She then got touchy about the photos of her looking 4 stone heavier.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • It is all down to the wind direction.    We've had two years of respite but today's westerly means we are receiving all the leftovers! (On the east side of the Rye, a couple of streets away.)
    • You can hear the Brockwell one really loudly in the Dulwich Park area already - and this is before the volume ramps for the headliners. A friend of ours lives much closer to Brockwell Park and says the noise there is unbearable. It seems like this weekend at least Dulwich is at the epi-centre of battling sound systems - like that awful spot in a festival field where you are getting the reverb from one stage interfering with the sound from the one you are trying to watch!
    • I agree Peckham Rose and this extra freebie day does not make up for the event's disruption and imposition onto more and more of the park. Now they have significantly enlarged the footprint of the event space it really dominates and changes the character of the park.   I personally do not mind the music aspect, but do not live right beside it so very easy for me to say and agree that in every way this event should be moved to a suitable site, which this small London Park is not. The amount of barriers they have installed is just crazy and the signage expressing sudden concern about nesting birds cravenly hypocritical considering the barrage of sound, low bass and light pollution they will be exposing them to.        
    • Well aren't you the lucky one.  Stick around!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...