Jump to content

Recommended Posts

We have had a pupil detail form sent home from school, which asks for all the usual stuff; child's full name, DOB, emergency contacts etc


Just turned to the parent detail page and it is asking for our National Insurance numbers and saying they are needed for the Dept of Education School Census and to determine whether or not our child is eligible for the Pupil Premium (a payment to the school) and free school meals.


I am really uncomfortable with disclosing this info. You are always told to keep your NI secure and only release it to an employer.


What do others think?

When I filled out the form relating to school dinners it only required the NI number if you were applying for free school meals ( beyond the years that they are free for regardless in Southwark). I guess so they can check that You are actually eligible
Sorry, phone typing! I'm sure you could leave it blank if you are uncomfortable with it. The only time that info has been requested by my kids school was on the council produced lunch form, not in the general info form, so I don't think it's essential.
We'd to fill it in for free school meals which now all kids up to Yr 4 are getting. I agree it seemed a little strange as it's not in any way means tested. Probably something to do with monitoring, I suspect. Trusting the school to deal appropriately with the info.

It's confusing but it's because the government gives every school ?600 pupil premimum for each student who is from a family which is on state benefits. They work this out by giving each school the money based on the number of pupils who receive the means tested free lunch. An unintended consquence of Southwarks free school meals policy for all is that parents who receive benefits are not filling in the forms for their child to receive a free school lunch since they don't need to any more. On that form, parents needed to put their N1 number which would show that the family was eligble for school meals and the school would also be eligble to claim the ?600 pupil premimum.


The result of parents who previously would have filled in the form to claim free school lunchs not doing so in Southwark has meant that many schools are seeing a drastic reduction in the amount of money they get receive which goes towards educational interventions to help disadvantaged children. For instance, in a school of 400 pupils, if 10% of those children used to receive the means tested school lunches the school should get a pupil premium grant of ?24,000 for the year. Which is the salary for a TA for the year for example. Schools are now having to find other ways to collect the information they need to provide the government with proof that they do have right to claim the pupil premium. It's a bit of a nightmare for Headteachers and Governing bodies, that is for sure as in these tough times schools can't afford to lose out on such a substative sum of money. This year it is more noticable than last year as the scheme was expanded to all children from reception to year 4 - it will become worse when it expands to all year groups.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • But what are you basing that judgement on? Vibes? where exactly and under what council is money being spent wisely? what about parties which promise to cut waste, come to power and find out there is no waste?   
    • I've just had James from Trelco round doing taps and hot water.  Prompt, efficient and pleasant people and the cost came in under what we thought it would be! Will definitely use them again.
    • Yes - adult care is a large part of the CT bill.  That does not mean the council spend our money well or wisely.        
    • “What do councils spend all the money on?” Is, in my view, one of the most profoundly emblematic of our times  we go about our lives, backed up by councils and governments and complain they aren’t needed  reform win elections based on “we’re gonna go in and slash all the waste!” Only to later admit there effectively isn’t any oh and by the way we need to increase council tax   Now all we have to offer is racism and ineptitude sorry about that  https://www.gbnews.com/money/reform-elon-musk-doge-failed-savings So where does the money go? On a multitude of services - but the increasingly aged population and the care provision required is a large part of it  the government could give councils more money to avoid council tax rises  - but the we would have to pay more in jewels taxation  and as a country we tend to pay less than other similar countries  so we end up with an expensive mend and make do approach  I don’t see any political parties offering a solution   Starmer is obviously lacking in many areas but he is the result of a hostile media and a reluctant population willing to hear truths  (wait until we hear how much we will need to increase defence spending by in the coming years) If a party stopped pretending all the money was wasted but published a list of costs, projections and proposals that wasn’t gutted to suit the landscape of needing to not bemonstered by the press or deemed too expensive by voters I would be very interested      can’t see that happening tho  (also worth reminding ourselves of all the brexiters who said things like “I don’t care how much it costs   I don’t care if I lose my job  it’s about taking back control!” And yet now we find them complaining about increasing costs. As they always will complain about everything  because it’s always someone else’s fault)   
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...