Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I'm starting another thread on this subject to share the information that I have had from the school offices of the Dulwich Village and Hamlet Schools.


Last year, the furthest distance for a non-church place for a child without a sibling at the Village school was 636m


At the Hamlet shcool it was 874m


Last year, 75 of the 90 children at DVIS went on to the Junior school.


For the last 3 years of admissions to the Hamlet school, the furthest distance for a non-sibiling applicant has been approximately the same as the furthest distance for a non-church, non-sibling place at the Village school three years previously. However, these distances are measured from different points. I think this means that, although a lot of people comment on how the Junior school has a wider "catchment" than the infant's school, that is comparing one year (e.g. 2012 for both schools) and not the same school year for a child (e.g. 2009 for infants compared to 2012 for the juniors).


The whole school application thing is making my head hurt, so I'm not sure I can put myself through doing it again in 3 years time. Any comments from people who are/have been in this situation. Are the schools really so great that it's worth all the hassle?

My son has just started at the infants and it seems a lovely school. Can't comment further

It might be worth bearing in mind the September 2011 intake was a bulge year so there may be a larger than average number of sibling places in the 2013 intake.

Hello - totally agree with KatDew and in the same position with a son who has just started DVI. My son is super-excited every day and keeps begging to go to school all day long (Reception has a gentle introduction of half days for the first couple of weeks).


However, WishfulThinking - I'm pretty sure I was told that first round offers for non-sibling non-church places were under 500m for Sept 2012 start. I know people got in from the waiting list though from further away than that. 636m rings a bell though! Maybe that was for Sept 2011 start or included offers to people on the waiting list?


I suppose the "wider" catchment area for Dulwich Hamlet is based mostly on one factor - that there aren't any church places so the admission criteria is predominantly distance (i.e. there are twice as many places avaialable based, mostly, on geography). Although there are bound to be a few more elder siblings for Hamlet admissions as it's a four year school, rather than a three year school like DVI. I think it would be surprising if your child got a non-church place at DVI and then didn't get one at the Hamlet at 7 - even if you're nearer the DVI measurement point than the Hamlet one.


A significant number of families send their children to DVI and then to fee-paying prep schools after that though. Just something else that might explain why only 75 out of 90 children from DVI went on to the Hamlet. (Or move out to the country to be near good grammars at 11...)

In answer to the OP's question about whether Dulwich Hamlet Junior School really is that good - I would say definitely it is. I transferred my daughter from another local school where we were very unhappy with the standards of teaching and discipline, and couldn't believe the difference. She had a brilliant education at Dulwich Hamlet, and I don't think she could possibly have had a better education if we had paid a fortune to send her to one of the local private schools.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • As I age, I understand a lot more about community spirit and people’s fear in the current climate of going to the assistance of a person in need. Yes, this might in part be aged related but is also driven by not wishing or wanting to help but a combination of self preservation and yes, fear of what the attacker might do or even worse get stabbed or physically assaulted.  Whilst it would be great to have more police presence to reassure community and hopefully act as a deterrent to people whose aim is to rob people or home and attack people, due to the cutbacks and not sure about my next comment but lack of police officers in general and reduce number of recruits, let’s face it - we as a community should step up to protect our community and assist police. Years ago, I attended one of these evening meeting with the local police officers - turn out was less than a dozen local residents. Yes, was in the evening when a lot of families were dealing with homework, feeding, after school activities and obviously there are housebound people and older members of the community who understandably would not wish to come out. I believe that to address this, the church at the top of Barry Road near the library have over the last couple of years advertised  and organised day time meeting with two local police officers responsible for the area to address issues concerning the local community. What  happened in daylight might as mentioned above been in part caused by an individual with possible mental health problems - the point is we should all feel safe on our streets in London and without doubt if you read the news, seems like stabbing, assault is now just the norm - a reflection of modern day society in any large town in the UK. If memory serves me correctly, not related to assault but was not someone stabbed a couple of years ago near the junction with the organic shop? And I believe mentioned recently someone died in the local community from an assault. Would be good to have an update from the police or someone known to the individual attacked.  I was in East Dulwich just last week talking to a friend in Barry Road and was surprised to see two bobbies walking along the road in broad daylight so now having heard about the assault can only assume police presence has been increased.   
    • Disagree. Where are the police when you need them? People want a police presence, they want to feel reassured by seeing them do what the word suggests, policing, so go catch some bad guys, arrest, charge and get the CPS to prosecute with the evidence to enable this to happen. Stabbing and shootings are so common place they no longer even get reported in the public domain. How many crimes don't get solved? Rather case closed and forgotten. The number of low to high level crimes which remain unsolved is staggering.  The criminal fraternity know this, they know they won't get caught so they just carry on.  Biggest crimes which affect most people, probably are phone and car theft, both are prolific and what do the police do, diddly squat. zilch, nothing, provide a crime reference number and the case is closed. Not good enough, not by a country mile.   Met Engage? I don't think so.
    • https://www.standard.co.uk/news/london/violent-crime-plunges-london-homicide-rate-b1247078.html Worth doing a little checking before making assumptions about violent crimes. Recent data suggests a drop in violent crime. Gang violence will make a significant contribution to the numbers. You are unlikely to be attacked by a stranger   
    • Unfortunately there are plenty of shops which don't care and will sell vapes, alcohol and weed to minors, I'm sure they won't care about selling them fireworks. Or the kids nick them.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...