Jump to content

Recommended Posts

yep, she's definitely thinking man's crumpet (could I be any more patronising).


I do feel Marx is probably closest to it in the long term. Capitalism will lumber from crisis to crisis until a better way is found at which point history will look back on it with an unkind eye as maybe a brutally necessary step on a way to a more enlightened path, much the way we do the first century or so of industrialisation.


Today's capitalism is harsh but the unregulated markets of a more laissez faire capitalism were directly responsible for millions of deaths in Ireland and India. Today capitalisms rampant scion, globalism, still maintains slavery, indentured labour or terrible working conditins throughout the world as we outsource our production to places without all that irritating rights and regulation nonsense, with the accompanying expense.


I can't imagine what that system is, but at the core of it will be energy. If scientific progress can give us limitless supplies of cheap energy we'll have solved most of our issues at a stroke.

Oil wars? Gone.

Water wars? Gone.

Food production and supply issues? Gone.


If we can get to: Money, gone; then it's game over for capitalism.


Not a bad start. Now, how's that cold fusion getting on...another century or so?

Yup, but EP that's where the pragamatism of Keynes (or, I guess if you're a bit more freemarket inclined, which I 'probably' am ,Freedman - sadly missing from this series) makes more sense to me. I was really struck by the utopian vision of both Marx and (unconciously) Hayak kind of ignoring or brushing over the huge, horrible, unpleasantness, misery and servitude for millions over a long period that giving complete control to the state or to the market gives, even if in the end they theoretically lead to Nivarna (of which I very much doubt).


SF - of course but unless we keep economics in a ghetto I thought this was entirely fit for purpose - getting people interested in the big economic theories.

I completely agree that given the lack of any other idea, state intervention to tinker and protect both capital and labour is the only way.

The amount which it does or doesn't intefere in either or where it sits on a sliding scale between the two is of course the defining attribute of politics over the last 75 odd years.


I don't think Marx envisaged state control as a path to Nirvana, I think that lacking any better ideas he just though it preferable to uncontrolled capitalism.

In terms of actual deaths it's probably even-stevens between either choice.


We're doing the best we can I guess as we blunder through the imperfections of stoicism, greed, fear, avarice, moralism, immorality, contempt, despair and aspiration that defines the human condition in the modern world.

As a connected aside I liked good old establishment Hampstead lefty, Tariq Ali's - "well of course if Marx had lived another ten years he'd have given us the answer"...or maybe if he'd (Marx) stopped swanning around in Hampstead Cafes sorting out his daughters' piano lessons :)

Not to be picky EP, but if you want to use that post again, I'd avoid "... moralism, immorality... " as the latter is a subset of the former. It's an Unnecessary Word.


That apart, I agree with both of you. Which is amazing, given my heretofore characterisation of EP as a conscientiously objecting pocket tyrant and Quids as a gunslinging small island working class neo conservative.


I'll talk to my editor.

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Not to be picky EP, but if you want to use that

> post again, I'd avoid "... moralism, immorality...

> " as the latter is a subset of the former. It's an

> Unnecessary Word.


Possibly a subset but disagree it's unnecessary - moralists and the immoral are two separate groups - each posing a different problem in society and neither fitting into a morality we would all be happy with.


If you wanted to get pedantic on EP's ass you might have chosen greed and avarice as being an egg too many in the batter.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Surely nobody is going to want books in poor condition, unless they are rare and possibly valuable?
    • Is that not only true within certain hours? I just did a quick Google and this came up (not specifically Southwark): The Noise Act 1996 defines "night hours" as 11 pm to 7 am, and local councils can take action if noise levels are excessive during this time. This means they can issue warning notices or even investigate for a statutory nuisance if the noise is particularly disruptive, according to Gov.uk.  I'm sure it's more complicated than that, and I'm sure it's been discussed on here before, though I can't remember which thread.
    • Get on those waiting lists asap if you haven't already. I waited till after the birth and it was very challenging getting a place once our daughter turned 1.  She ended up at LEYF Camberwell (we had to accept 2 days to start and gradually got to ramp up 5 days). She absolutely loved it there after an initial shaky start but her key worker and team worked really hard to settle her in. They spent a lot of time giving her cuddles and making her feel safe. Great outdoor space and really caring, enthusiastic staff with low turnover. Would highly recommend. 
    • We are expecting a baby in a few months, and have heard about the epic waiting lists for nurseries in the area... We have been to look around, and are considering, LEYF Camberwell, N Family Club Camberwell and Purple Jay Herne Hill. Would love to hear any feedback from experienced parents!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...