Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi littlep,

The main reticence about roof terraces is about over looking other peoples properties. Southwark compared to many other boroughs has higher density. So your builder is probably correct compared to less dense areas of London.


I've seen a number of applications that have included flat roof space where conditions have been added blocking this after a number of neighbouring residents expressed fear about a roof terrace being created.


so would you overlook any neighbouring properties or gardens. IF you would then you need to work out whether they'd mind or not. If they would then you'll understandably have a fight on your hands with other people wanting to preserve the privacy and use of their property/land.


Hope this helped and I hope it all works out for you and your neighbours.

We live on Friern Road and around us quite a few of the houses have been divided into 2 flats and the top flat has got a roof terrace and stair case leading to their half of the garden.


I suppose I do notice them but only as much as I would notice if they were in the garden (all our fences are half height) and I think it's so important that people can have outdoor space if possible that it probably outweighs any lack of privacy. Fingers crossed you have understanding neighbours.

If the outside space is really that important to you then you should really try to find a property that already has it. When we are all living cheek by jowl, the limited privacy we do have becomes increasingly important. I don't want to be overlooked as I would be if neighbours built a roof terrace. It's not as if I'm doing a Kate Middleton, but I do want to be able to enjoy the tiny garden we have without somebody else looking in on us.


Southwark Council and the Planning Inspectorate (for appeals) have taken a very consistent line - if an application for a roof terrace would cause overlooking of neighbouring properties it is very unlikely to get the go-ahead. There's nothing to stop you putting in the application, but you can't expect your neighbours to be supportive - what would make your home more enjoyable, more valuable and easier to sell would have the opposite effect on their homes.

Planners tend to take the long term view when it comes to roof terraces and overlooking. So even if current neighbours don't object, future neighbours might.

If a terrace meant that you overlooked neighbours you're unlikely to get planning for it reagrdless if your neighbours didn't object...

We tried and a planning officer came over to say why we could not have one. The problem is the issue of overlooking others according to him. We suggested we would have tall walls of hedges so that we could not and also to provide added green spaces for wildlife - our design was primarily garden. The planning officer said even though it was "green" southwark was quite firmly against roof terraces and would not budge, the exception being in multi-occupancy flats where outdoor spaces were needed. We tried every angle to no avail. Also - another person on our street was forces to remove theirs. Alas.

Otto,


I imagine it is all about setting a precedent, because even if yours were allowed to go ahead and was screened and green, as you say, it would probably open up the territory for much less neighbour-friendly developments. .


I have to say that I think the skyline is being increasingly ruined by the number of appalling loft conversions that have been passed- stalinist mock-slate obelisks, atop humble terrace houses.

I undertake a lot of planning in Southwark and it will be a hard one to get through. That said I have seen in the past clever use of angled slats, obscured glazing, organic walls etc to obscure any view of neighbours gardens... this obviously still lets the light in but you cant oversea your neighbours. If you do want to give it a try then feel free to give me a buzz... Good luck, Mikail

We dealt with something similar a while back - the top of our house has balconies at the front and back, the back one overlooks neighbours' gardens, and the front one overlooks the road.


Southwark Planning originally took the view that neither balcony could be used at all other than for roof maintenance because of the same privacy concerns and issues. After a lot of discussions, it was agreed that the planning permission would note the back balcony couldn't be used other for maintenance (and if neighbours complained enforcement would follow). However there is no restriction on the front balcony, because we could show the areas overlooked could already be seen from other neighboring properties windows and partly from the road.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I mean I hold no portfolio to defend Gala,  but I suspect that is their office.  I am a company director,  my home address is also not registered with Companies House. Also guys this is Peckham not Royston Vasey.  Shoreditch is a mere 20 mins away by train, it's not an offshore bolt hole in Luxembourg.
    • While it is good that GALA have withdrawn their application for a second weekend, local people and councillors will likely have the same fight on their hands for next year's event. In reading the consultation report, I noted the Council were putting the GALA event in the same light as all the other events that use the park, like the Circus, the Fair and even the FOPR fete. ALL of those events use the common, not the park, and cause nothing like the level of noise and/or disruption of the GALA event. Even the two day Irish Festival (for those that remember that one) was never as noisy as GALA. So there is some disingenuity and hypocrisy from the Council on this, something I wll point out in my response to the report. The other point to note was that in past years branches were cut back for the fencing. Last year the council promised no trees would be cut after pushback, but they seem to now be reverting to a position of 'only in agreement with the council's arbourist'. Is this more hypocrisy from 'green' Southwark who seem to once again be ok with defacing trees for a fence that is up for just days? The people who now own GALA don't live in this area. GALA as an event began in Brockwell Park. It then lost its place there to bigger events (that pesumably could pay Lambeth Council more). One of the then company directors lived on the Rye Hill Estate next to the park and that is likely how Peckham Rye came to be the new choice for the event. That person is no longer involved. Today's GALA company is not the same as the 'We Are the Fair' company that held that first event, not the same in scope, aim or culture. And therein lies the problem. It's not a local community led enterprise, but a commercial one, underwritten by a venture capital company. The same company co-run the Rally Event each year in Southwark Park, which btw is licensed as a one day event only. That does seem to be truer to the original 'We Are the Fair' vision, but how much of that is down to GALA as opoosed to 'Bird on the Wire' (the other group organising it) is hard to say.  For local people, it's three days of not being able to open windows, As someone said above, if a resident set up a PA in their back garden and subjected the neighbours to 10 hours of hard dance music every day for three days, the Council would take action. Do not underestimate how distressing that is for many local residents, many of whom are elderly, frail, young, vulnerable. They deserve more respect than is being shown by those who think it's no big deal. And just to be clear, GALA and the council do not consider there to be a breach of db level if the level is corrected within 15 minutes of the breach. In other words, while db levels are set as part of the noise management plan, there is an acknowledgement that a breach is ok if corrected within 15 minutes. That is just not good enough. Local councillors objected to the proposed extension. 75% of those that responded to the consultation locally did not want GALA 26 to take place at all. For me personally, any goodwill that had been built up through the various consultations over recent years was erased with that application for a second weekend, and especially given that when asked if there were plans for that in post 2025 event feedback meetings (following rumours), GALA lied and said there were no plans to expand. I have come to the conclusion that all the effort to appease on some things is merely an exercise in show, to get past the council's threshold for the events licence. They couldn't give a hoot in reality for local people, and people that genuinely care about parkland, don't litter it with noisy festivals either.   
    • Aria is my go to plumber. Fixed a toilet leak for me at short notice. Reasonably priced and very professional. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...