Jump to content

Recommended Posts

you have to live in the POSH TOFF part of dulwich NEVER GO in a pound shop or iceland as these shops are not for the real POSH TOFF thats all you have to do. but beware you get seen in a pound shop you lose the lot.ps a lot of them use a disguise you can tell when they pay,ie ask the staff to pack the bags and ask if they deliver in a ocado van.

Yup - corner of Silvester and CPR - the lights and fans overloaded the electrics and it went afire. It was all over the South London Press at the time - the story is from before the earliest archive on the SLP website though there are copies of the article on some stoner websites. ?25k street value, so they said at the time. Of course, East Dulwich was less posh then (November 2004).



Of course, if you go back a bot further (early to mid 90s), East Dulwich police station was a key centre in the south London dealing scene. Some boys in blue got nicked for it - as I recall, something along the lines of arresting someone with 1kg of wed, charging them with half that, and the other half disappearing from the evidence suite - though on a bigger scale than that. When EDPS was home to the South East Regional Crime Squad. I've often wondered whether there is any link between the planned closure of EDPS and its sorry history in the 80s and 90s. A couple of links about the story here:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/1999/oct/06/nickhopkins

and here

http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/static/audio_video/programmes/panorama/transcripts/transcript_03_12_00.txt

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Morally they should, but we don't actually vote for parties in our electoral system. We vote for a parliamentary (or council) representative. That candidates group together under party unbrellas is irrelevant. We have a 'representative' democracy, not a party political one (if that makes sense). That's where I am on things at the moment. Reform are knocking on the door of the BNP, and using wedge issues to bait emotional rage. The Greens are knocking on the door of the hard left, sweeping up the Corbynista idealists. But it's worth saying that both are only ascending because of the failures of the two main parties and the successive governments they have led. Large parts of the country have been left in economic decline for decades, while city fat cats became uber wealthy. Young people have been screwed over by student loans. Housing is 40 years of commoditisation, removing affordabilty beyond the reach of too many. Decently paid, secure jobs, seem to be a thing of the past. Which of the main parties can people turn to, to fix any of these things, when the main parties are the reason for the mess that has been allowed to evolve? Reform certainly aren't the answer to those things. The Greens may aspire to do something meaningful about some of them, but where will they find the money to pay for it? None of it's easy.
    • Yes, but the context is important and the reason.
    • That messes up Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland - democracy being based on citizenship not literacy. There's intentionally no one language that campaign materials have to be in. 
    • TBH if people don't see what is sectarian in the materials linked to above when they read about them, then I don't think me going on about it will help. They speak for themselves.  I don't know how the Greens can justify promising to be a strong voice for one particular religion. Will that pledge hold when it comes to campaigning in East Dulwich (which is majority atheist)? https://censusdata.uk/e02000836-east-dulwich/ts030-religion
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...