Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I have spent a frustrating few hours recently searching for reasonably stylish but affordable furniture. Goodness there isn't much. For example, bedroom chairs. Nothing armchair-like to be had for under 500 pounds. Can anyone advise better on where I should be looking? Or have I just lost track of prices and this is the way it is? Thank you

You're Furnished is a pretty good bet if you want to save some money (massive selection at exceptionally good prices, though not sure they'd fall into the 'stylish' category), no online presence though, you have to get your arse up to Stansted, and hiring their van to deliver it all is about 70 quid. We saved about 2 grand over london prices when furnishing our flat so well worth it (low overheads you see, it's a massive warehouse in a field tucked behind an unfashionble airport)


http://archive.homesandbargains.co.uk/view_listing.php?id=154


Mrs Robinson get some lovely pieces in every now and then. We got a 'stylish' 60s danish leather swivelly armchair thingy a couple of years ago for ?250, though we recently saw an indentical one in there going for ?350, fuel costs huh?

Another forumite posted a while back about a French online homewares company who recently launched an English language website, and I was pretty impressed by their products and price range. We got our garden furniture from there, and I'm really delighted with it, as the only other stuff I'd been able to find that I liked was of the Gloster (ie eye-wateringly expensive) variety.


www.maisonsdumonde.com

Gidget Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Buy something second hand and get it

> recovered/upholstered. Auction/ebay/gumtree/here.



If it's in good enough condition then you could just get a loose cover made. Some things sold on here look to be in excellent condition though. I have bought 2 items of furniture from Habitat in the past and they were both terrible. One was a sofa and the springs slipped down inside the back and arms. Thankfully they took it back eventually and I got a refund. Also bought a daybed from them and the seat cushion would not stay on the base. That went back as well.


Also had a bad experience with an M&S armchair. That went back as well.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Girls In Your City - No Selfie - Anonymous Casual Dating https://SecreLocal.com [url=https://SecreLocal.com] Girls In Your City [/url] - Anonymous Casual Dating - No Selfie New Girls [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/molly-15.html]Molly[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/cheryl-blossom-48.html]Cheryl Blossom[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/carola-conymegan-116.html]Carola Conymegan[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/pupa-41.html]Pupa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/mia-candy-43.html]Mia Candy[/url]
    • This is a remarkable interpretation of history. Wikipedia (with more footnotes and citations than you could shake a shitty stick at sez: The austerity programme was initiated in 2010 by the Conservative and Liberal Democrat coalition government. In his June 2010 budget speech, Osborne identified two goals. The first was that the structural current budget deficit would be eliminated to "achieve [a] cyclically-adjusted current balance by the end of the rolling, five-year forecast period". The second was that national debt as a percentage of GDP would fall. The government intended to achieve both of its goals through substantial reductions in public expenditure.[21] This was to be achieved by a combination of public spending cuts and tax increases amounting to £110 billion.[26] Between 2010 and 2013, the Coalition government said that it had reduced public spending by £14.3 billion compared with 2009–10.[27] Growth remained low, while unemployment rose. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_government_austerity_programme From memory, last time around they were against the LTNs and competing with the Tories to pick up backlash votes - both failed. They had no counterproposals or ideas about how to manage congestion or pollution. This time around they're simply silent on the matter: https://www.southwark-libdems.org.uk/your-local-lib-dem-team/goosegreen Also, as we have seen from Mr Barber's comments on the new development on the old Jewsons yard, "leading campaigns to protect the character of East Dulwich and Goose Green" is code for "blocking new housing".
    • @Insuflo NO, please no, please don't encourage him to post more often! 😒
    • Revealing of what, exactly? I resurrected this thread, after a year, to highlight the foolishness of the OP’s op. And how posturing would be sagacity is quickly undermined by events, dear boy, events. The thread is about Mandelson. I knew he was a wrong ‘un all along, we all did; the Epstein shit just proves it. In reality, Kinnock, Blair, Brown, Starmer et all knew as well but accepted it, because they found him useful. As did a large proportion of the 2024 intake of Labour MPs who were personally vetted and approved by Mandelson.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...