Jump to content

Good vet in South London area


EGL

Recommended Posts

We love the Neighbourhood vet on Lordship lane SE22 https://theneighbourhoodvet.co.uk/galleries/east-dulwich/ - they have been fantastic with our cats - very caring and they always find time for urgent appointments at very short notice. I'll send you more details in a PM but wanted to share that with others too.

I've recently registered my animals (yesterday) at the Norwood Road surgery and it was really straightforward.


I've always taken them up to the Lordship Lane pets surgery (for 15 years) opposite the old Harvesters. Unfortunately and due to the closure of the Dulwich Village junction with the plant pots, I can't chance my animals being put through any added stress as the journey now takes double the time.

Plus one for Neighbourhood Vet on LL.


Lovely team (esp reception) and very good with both our cats (one of which is super nervy). Some people have mentioned unexpected costs/treatment there but I?ve never had an issue. I normally see the male Antipodean vet there (and now embarrassed I don?t know his name, but maybe Sean?) but he gave me great advice about teeth cleaning techniques for the same nervy cat a few years ago, which has saved me ??? in the long run.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • Depends on what the Barista says doesnt it? There was no physical confrontation with the driver, OP thinks she is being targetted when she isnt. These guys work min wage under strict schedules so give them a break unless they damage your stuff
    • CPR Dave, attendance records are available on Southwark's website. Maggie Browning has attended 100% of meetings. Jon Hartley has attended 65%.
    • I do hope NOT, wouldn't trust Farage as far as I could throw him, Starmer & co.  He's backed by GB News which focus's predominantly on immigration while the BBC focus predominantly on the Israel - Gazza conflict.   
    • Everyone gets the point that Corbynites try to make with the "total number of votes cast" statistic, it's just a specious one.  In 2017, Corbyn's Labour got fewer votes than May's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes). In 2019, Corbyn's Labour fewer votes than Johnson's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes); and he managed to drop 2.7 million votes or 6.9% of vote share between the two elections. I repeat, he got trounced by Boris F***ing Johnson and the Tories after the Brexit omnishambles. It is not true that a "fairer" electoral system would have seen Labour beat the Tories: Labour simply got fewer votes than the Tories. Corbyn lost twice. There is no metric by which he won the general election. His failure to win was a disaster for the UK, and let Johnson and Truss and Sunak into office. Corbynites have to let go of this delusion that Corbyn but really won somehow if you squint in a certain way. It is completely irrelevant that Labour under Corbyn got more votes than Labour under Starmer. It is like saying Hull City was more successful in its 2014 FA Cup Final than Chelsea was in its 2018 FA Cup Final, because Hull scored 2 goals when Chelsea only scored 1. But guess what - Chelsea won its game and Hull City lost. Corbyn's fans turned out to vote for him - but an even larger group of people who found him repellant were motivated enough to show up and vote Tory.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...