Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Two hideous years on from the start of an insurance claim which is still ongoing, I have referred two complaints to the F.O.S. and they are being considered together as there is a lot of overlap. The claim is for subsidence in the bay at the front of my house.


The amount of compensation in both cases I was offered by the insurance company (Zurich) was derisory, but the F.O.S. has so far said they think it is fair, even though it was apparently solely for specific delays and for lack of acknowledgment of emails.


I summarised why I thought it wasn't, and now the F.O.S. have asked me "how much I think would be acceptable in the circumstances".


There were avoidable errors, delays and lack of communication throughout, however the main issue is that building and redecoration work which I was initially told would take three days, then "six weeks of major disruption", ended up being five months of major disruption. This all stemmed from errors made in the initial survey, followed by other errors and what have been described to me by various contractors as poor decisions.


During these five months, the main part of my house was unusable, and I had to either sit on a hard chair in my kitchen or go to bed. Neither room gets any sun in the afternoon. Most of the period was spring/summer, and I was nearly seventy. My back garden was also unusable and I couldn't even sit in it. There were a number of other related issues.


I ended up with severe stress, plus debilitating physical illnesses which were apparently caused or worsened by the stress, one of which is ongoing and chronic. I took steps to deal with the stress as best I could.


Clearly I am never going to get these five months of my life back, so it is rather hard to put a monetary figure on it. However I would like a fair amount of compensation taking into account the cumulative effect on my life. On the other hand I don't want them to think I am taking the p***.


I've also had to spend weeks (literally weeks) putting together the two complaints and then the case for the F.O.S., because for various reasons the whole thing became extremely complicated.


If you have any insurance experience or experience of the F.O.S., I'd be really grateful for advice on a ballpark figure I should be asking for, and also whether I should aim high on the basis that they will then negotiate down (I have no idea how these things work).


A PM would be great if you'd rather not post on the thread. Thanks!

Hi Sue, I know it's not the same body, but the Legal Ombudsman have a guide for compensation and the level of inconvenience.


It may be worth seeing if the FO do as well?

I'll see if I can find the one I'm referring to and will same end you the link.


Are there solicitors specialising in this you could call and get some advice? Or the Citizens Advice Bureau?

Jules-and-Boo Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hi Sue, I know it's not the same body, but the

> Legal Ombudsman have a guide for compensation and

> the level of inconvenience.

>

> It may be worth seeing if the FO do as well?

> I'll see if I can find the one I'm referring to

> and will same end you the link.



Thanks, yes they do, but looking at their cases it seems that my idea of level of inconvenience is not theirs!!!


I will try the C.A.B., thanks.


I wondered about speaking to my broker, who actually advised me to make the first complaint, however I'm not sure exactly what their connection is to the insurance company.


I don't want to pay a solicitor because I think it might end up costing me most of the compensation!

>

> Are there solicitors specialising in this you

> could call and get some advice? Or the Citizens

> Advice Bureau?



Oops sorry I seem to have jumbled up your post in my reply.

I don't mean paying a solicitor, I mean calling them and having a chat (some do initial free consultation) and seeing if you have a case.


Definitely speak to your broker - especially if they've made reference to it already.

Brokers are independent of insurance companies.


You need to get more info....

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • No doubt the schools in Harrogate are being discussed on the East Harrogate Forum or whatever. Dulwich College is being discussed because it's local. Saying "ooh, there were loads of schools mentioned" is a bit dismissive. It was Dulwich College that referred sex abuse allegations about pupils to the police and Dulwich College that used the spectre of the police to suppress dissent. 🤔
    • Hi, I was just wondering what experiences any of you have had in relation to an Independent Panel review relating to the Permanent Exclusion of a SEN child. 1. General experience Any experiences, positive or negative, in general? 2. Clerks Associates UK Any experience of this entity acting as an "independent clerk" to an Independent Review Panel in a matter involving a Permanent Exclusion of a SEN pupil, also involving discrimination under the Equality Act 2010. There is limited publicly available information with regards to this "independent clerk"; however, I can see from their Annual Report & Accounts at Companies House that they are a small, privately owned organisation.   I am very concerned that there is a clear and material risk that they are highly dependent for their revenues and cash flow from the business that they receive from the school and its parent Trust (which has 9 schools in total under its management) who have appointed them. I also note that the Trust has a material employee relations dispute with their staff over underpayment of maternity pay whilst materially increasing the salaries of the highest paid Trust executives and other highly paid staff (presumably the Head Teachers). https://southwarknews.co.uk/news/community/teachers-at-six-charter-schools-walk-out-in-first-of-four-strike-days-planned-for-this-month/ Given the current situation, we have no choice but to engage in this process of an Independent Panel Review; however, we are concerned as to various elements including this one which is a key role in providing independence. 3. Independent SEN expert We have the right to an independent SEN expert to review the matter and provide their opinion to the Independent Review Panel. The concept is that this person is supposedly acting "independently" and also solely in respect of the SEN elements of the matter. We do not however know who this person is, their experience or level of independence. The last information that I can find in the public domain about the effectiveness of an Independent SEN expert is a UK govt report from 2014 which portrays a very mixed experience for parents. Hence, we are seeking to understand if anyone has any more recent experience of an Independent SEN expert in relation to an Independent Panel Review. Many thanks for any thoughts that you have based on your experience. For reasons of confidentiality, it is perhaps better to send any replies to me directly. Many thanks
    • Hang in there, friends. Most of us appreciate that you're trying you best and these companies are a nightmare!
    • I agree about the site and buying another one, but I was responding to a query about the old site. Which was no longer fit for purpose. Selling that and not buying another locally was just money for old rope for the foreign owners, as was moving the DO to an unsuitable building too far away. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...