Jump to content

Recommended Posts

With both of these - I am considering using them this winter in extreme cold/cough situations with my 4 1/2 year old - is that completely irresponsible - if i gave her a half dose? Am I right in thinking it's the sedative anti histamine that is the reason the age was raised to 6 years. She already has piriton fairly frequently (as in every 3/4 months perhaps) due to allergies. My reasoning is that often gets such bad coughs that she is up for night after night so I really think she needs something to help her sleep when she gets a cough like this?


Just mulling it over when I read this thread.


Susypx

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/25940-medised/#findComment-581413
Share on other sites

susyp Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> With both of these - I am considering using them

> this winter in extreme cold/cough situations with

> my 4 1/2 year old - is that completely

> irresponsible - if i gave her a half dose? Am I

> right in thinking it's the sedative anti histamine

> that is the reason the age was raised to 6 years.


I think there were multiple reasons for raising the age. One of the main reasons seems to be the occurence of paracetamol overdose. It's been known for a while that acute paracetamol OD is highly toxic and potentially life-threatening. However, it's also come to light in more recent research that even overly frequent use is associated with some potentially very serious problems.


There is also research disputing the sedative effects of the antihistamine (diphenhydramine) at therapeutic doses as an antihistamine. While the anitihistamine may indeed cause drowsiness, it does not reduce night time wakings. (I think I posted the link to the data on the other thread about Medised.)


Antihistamines are really for congestion, not cough. If the cough is caused by fluid from the sinus draining into the upper airways when the child is sleeping, then elevating the head of the bead will help with proper fluid drainage and circulation.


If your child is prone to cough or has a history of chest infections, her airways may be hypersensitive. If cough is very bad or persistant, you'd really do best to pursue it with a sympathetic GP. Opioids like codeine are excellent at suppressing cough and inducing sleep. However, you really cannot give these to children without proper medical supervision b/c they do cause respiratory depression ("lowered breathing"). To make it more challenging, many OTC formulations of codeine contain NSAIDs like paracetamol or ibuprofen, which are contraindicated in some situations of respiratory hypersensitivity.


Geez, it's all so complicated! Whatever happened to just giving them whisky? ;-)

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/25940-medised/#findComment-581504
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • was the price not displayed on the menu?
    • It has come to this author’s attention that the world of 4+ admissions — that most enigmatic of educational rites — continues to bewilder even the most composed of parents. Fear not. For in a former life, I was not merely a humble observer, but a seasoned educator of over twenty years, and Head of Pre-Prep for a distinguished dozen. Now, with quill exchanged for touchscreen, I have taken to that most modern of salons — Instagram — to dispense guidance, answer frequently whispered questions, and illuminate the shadowy corners of school selection with clarity and calm. Each post bears my signature twist: a blend of insight, levity, and the occasional raised eyebrow. Should you find yourself adrift in the sea of admissions, I suggest you peruse my latest dispatch. It may well be the lifeline you seek. The Delicate Dilemma of the Summer-born 4+ Scholars Yours in solidarity and scholastic savvy, Lord Pencilton  🎩✏️
    • Perhaps Gooseygreeny was not familiar with the wildlife before Gala was imposed on the park, since when its value to wildlife has deteriorated. The Park had never been disturbed before, as the council had respected it as a Site of Importance for Nature Conservation, so only the Common was licensed by them as a site for events. The first time Gala held their event, there was a tree with woodpeckers nesting in it right in the middle of the main field they used and thrushes, blackbirds and great tits nesting within the shrubs and trees immediately surrounding the field. The woodpeckers were thriving on ants from the anthills in the grass. To those of us who used to enjoy watching the wildlife, it was very obviously a Site of Importance for a variety of birds. Despite being accessed by the public and their dogs, it had been relatively undisturbed,  which was one of the main reasons why it was so special and why I have been opposed to the Gala festival being held during the bird nesting season.
    • So dangerous!    Can you be more specific about the road this was in and when you report it?  Maybe there’s some CCTV footage available
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...