Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Reading this thread (and others on the forum) anyone would think the hound of the baskervilles was loose in south london.


While I completely agree that agressive dogs should be kept under control and on the lead, it's completely impractical to suggest that dog owners ought to ask everyone they meet if it's okay for their dog to approach strangers.


It's also worth getting some perspective here. Although dog bites are on the rise, they're still far from being prevalent. The NHS usefully collates hospital admission statistics, and looking at the under 15s (people seem most concerned about kids here) dog bites/attacks fall at number 28 on the list for 2010-11 (1422 incidents). As a comparison, falls from playground equipment is at number 2 (8149 incidents) and kicking/scratching/bites from people is at 22 (1822 incidents).


Given that people are clearly more dangerous than dogs, perhaps we should be asking permission of everyone we meet in the park if it is okay to walk near them?

haruki Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Reading this thread (and others on the forum)

> anyone would think the hound of the baskervilles

> was loose in south london.

>

> While I completely agree that agressive dogs

> should be kept under control and on the lead, it's

> completely impractical to suggest that dog owners

> ought to ask everyone they meet if it's okay for

> their dog to approach strangers.

>

> It's also worth getting some perspective here.

> Although dog bites are on the rise, they're still

> far from being prevalent. The NHS usefully

> collates hospital admission statistics, and

> looking at the under 15s (people seem most

> concerned about kids here) dog bites/attacks fall

> at number 28 on the list for 2010-11 (1422

> incidents). As a comparison, falls from playground

> equipment is at number 2 (8149 incidents) and

> kicking/scratching/bites from people is at 22

> (1822 incidents).

>

> Given that people are clearly more dangerous than

> dogs, perhaps we should be asking permission of

> everyone we meet in the park if it is okay to walk

> near them?



I wish there were a 'like' option :)

Peckhamgatecrasher Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Just to put some perspective on the title, it was

> posted originally in the ED section following a

> post titled "agressive dog owner in PRP". Perhaps

> a misguided attempt at humour.



thanks PGC I was waiting for some 3/10 type posts and then everyone seemed to be taking it very seriously and I thought that it was perhAps me who was wrong. Rubbish post/thread/wind up.

Good post from Haruki.


I thought it was obvious that the title was meant to be a piss take of the dog owner threads, but I'm not sure it was a trolling effort. Either way, it is a valid point that SOME parents do seem to think that once they bring a kid in to the world, the rest of us should just work around them.

the-e-dealer Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I take your point. It is usually dog owners that

> are agressive not parents.


I think both can be aggressive and intolerant of others TBH, as the OP demonstrates (but maybe not in the way she intended). Re the latter - I was walking briskly towards my train the other day when a kid ran out in front of me suddenly causing me to trip and fall over in an attempt to avoid landing on the little boy. As I tumbled I instinctively yelped 'Watch out'. Cue a torrent of abuse towards me from the boy's mother as I clambered painfully to my feet for daring to say 'Watch out' to her kid - I was staggered (literally).


Back to dogs running up to kids etc., if the owner can't control the dog it isn't the poor dog's fault but the owners's. I still think Etta's post is the most sensible on this thread.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The current wave of xenophobia is due to powerful/influential people stirring up hatred.  It;'s what happened in the past, think 1930s Germany.  It seems to be even easier now as so many get their information from social media, whether it is right or wrong.  The media seeking so called balance will bring some nutter on, they don't then bring a nutter on to counteract that. They now seem to turn to Reform at the first opportunity. So your life is 'shite', let;s blame someone else.  Whilst sounding a bit like a Tory, taking some ownership/personal responsibility would be a start.  There are some situations where that may be more challenging, in deindustrialised 'left behind' wasteland we can't all get on our bikes and find work.  But I loathe how it is now popular to blame those of us from relatively modest backgrounds, like me, who did see education and knowledge as a way to self improve. Now we are seen by some as smug liberals......  
    • Kwik Fit buggered up an A/C leak diagnosis for me (saying there wasn't one, when there was) and sold a regas. The vehicle had to be taken to an A/C specialist for condensor replacement and a further regas. Not impressed.
    • Yes, these are all good points. I agree with you, that division has led us down dangerous paths in the past. And I deplore any kind of racism (as I think you probably know).  But I feel that a lot of the current wave of xenophobia we're witnessing is actually more about a general malaise and discontent. I know non-white people around here who are surprisingly vocal about immigrants - legal or otherwise. I think this feeling transcends skin colour for a lot of people and isn't as simple as, say, the Jew hatred of the 1930s or the Irish and Black racism that we saw laterally. I think people feel ignored and looked down upon.  What you don't realise, Sephiroth, is that I actually agree with a lot of what you're saying. I just think that looking down on people because of their voting history and opinions is self-defeating. And that's where Labour's getting it wrong and Reform is reaping the rewards.   
    • @Sephiroth you made some interesting points on the economy, on the Lammy thread. Thought it worth broadening the discussion. Reeves (irrespective of her financial competence) clearly was too downbeat on things when Labour came into power. But could there have been more honesty on the liklihood of taxes going up (which they have done, and will do in any case due to the freezing of personal allowances).  It may have been a silly commitment not to do this, but were you damned if you do and damned if you don't?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...