Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Reading this thread (and others on the forum) anyone would think the hound of the baskervilles was loose in south london.


While I completely agree that agressive dogs should be kept under control and on the lead, it's completely impractical to suggest that dog owners ought to ask everyone they meet if it's okay for their dog to approach strangers.


It's also worth getting some perspective here. Although dog bites are on the rise, they're still far from being prevalent. The NHS usefully collates hospital admission statistics, and looking at the under 15s (people seem most concerned about kids here) dog bites/attacks fall at number 28 on the list for 2010-11 (1422 incidents). As a comparison, falls from playground equipment is at number 2 (8149 incidents) and kicking/scratching/bites from people is at 22 (1822 incidents).


Given that people are clearly more dangerous than dogs, perhaps we should be asking permission of everyone we meet in the park if it is okay to walk near them?

haruki Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Reading this thread (and others on the forum)

> anyone would think the hound of the baskervilles

> was loose in south london.

>

> While I completely agree that agressive dogs

> should be kept under control and on the lead, it's

> completely impractical to suggest that dog owners

> ought to ask everyone they meet if it's okay for

> their dog to approach strangers.

>

> It's also worth getting some perspective here.

> Although dog bites are on the rise, they're still

> far from being prevalent. The NHS usefully

> collates hospital admission statistics, and

> looking at the under 15s (people seem most

> concerned about kids here) dog bites/attacks fall

> at number 28 on the list for 2010-11 (1422

> incidents). As a comparison, falls from playground

> equipment is at number 2 (8149 incidents) and

> kicking/scratching/bites from people is at 22

> (1822 incidents).

>

> Given that people are clearly more dangerous than

> dogs, perhaps we should be asking permission of

> everyone we meet in the park if it is okay to walk

> near them?



I wish there were a 'like' option :)

Peckhamgatecrasher Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Just to put some perspective on the title, it was

> posted originally in the ED section following a

> post titled "agressive dog owner in PRP". Perhaps

> a misguided attempt at humour.



thanks PGC I was waiting for some 3/10 type posts and then everyone seemed to be taking it very seriously and I thought that it was perhAps me who was wrong. Rubbish post/thread/wind up.

Good post from Haruki.


I thought it was obvious that the title was meant to be a piss take of the dog owner threads, but I'm not sure it was a trolling effort. Either way, it is a valid point that SOME parents do seem to think that once they bring a kid in to the world, the rest of us should just work around them.

the-e-dealer Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I take your point. It is usually dog owners that

> are agressive not parents.


I think both can be aggressive and intolerant of others TBH, as the OP demonstrates (but maybe not in the way she intended). Re the latter - I was walking briskly towards my train the other day when a kid ran out in front of me suddenly causing me to trip and fall over in an attempt to avoid landing on the little boy. As I tumbled I instinctively yelped 'Watch out'. Cue a torrent of abuse towards me from the boy's mother as I clambered painfully to my feet for daring to say 'Watch out' to her kid - I was staggered (literally).


Back to dogs running up to kids etc., if the owner can't control the dog it isn't the poor dog's fault but the owners's. I still think Etta's post is the most sensible on this thread.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • And from what I remember, she eventually cut the tea shop for a similar  reason to chandelier.  Chariot style buggies
    • Oh yes, it could have been about there, I can't remember exactly. At one point there seemed to be a load of pizza places opening on NCR. I vaguely remember the one we used to use was put out of business by another one which opened. Wasn't Grace and Favour's food offering more of a tea shop at the back of the actual shop? If memory serves the owner, whose name escapes me now, was one of the earliest people I know to move to Hastings. Which must now be crammed with South East Londoners 🤣
    • That Neal Street veggie cafe was great. Food For Thought ❤️
    • Hi Dogkennelhillbilly, You won't be aware that i proposed infill sites for housing in East Dulwich - the garages on Bassano Street and Henslowe that respectively became 1-4 Dill Terrace family houses and the 78, 80, 80A Henslowe Street family houses. These were council owned garages and it was frustrating how slow the council was to go from my idea to completion (roughly eight years). East Dulwich has some other vacant WW2 bomb sites I'm guessing that the private land owners have been sitting on.Owe for a land tax for vacant land.  WRT to the builders yard by East dulwich station. Southwark Council has an agreed policy the area should remain suburban 2/3 storeys maximum. But the approved scheme is 9 storeys of student accommodation. Very hard to put this genie back in the bottle. The council has recently publicly stated lower ratios of social housing will be required. I will be amazed if the developer doesn't submit another application now they have the 9 storeys approved but with significantly less social housing. The less social housing the higher the land values. The higher the land values the less social housing viability reports state are possible.  If we really want to increase home supply - Southwark have over 6,000 empty homes. Vancouver charges a low % of the value of empty homes and rapidly eased this problem. Parts of Wales have introduced under Article 4 planning permission is required for second homes seeing within 12 months a dramatic decrease in property prices. Southwark Council have Article 4 requirements - why not add this one? It takes National political will to solve this AND regional and local authorities such as the second home council tax premium and these being used promptly. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...