Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Jessie Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'm far more interested in what the hospitals and

> children's homes have to say for themselves. BBC

> is a v easy target for right wing press and its

> followers.



Mmmmm. Another sacred cow which can,t be criticised without rasing the normal defensive hogwash? Rubbish, it failed miserably and almost systematically for years on the abuse and more recently by , at best, ignoring it. Not the only guilt party but so what.

it's all starting to sound a bit like the Cleveland Satanic Ring thingy to me now...apparently the main accuser has some form. An enquiry is needed for absolutely clarity and to punish any wromg doers but I feel there is the potential wiff of Conspiracy Theory plus all tories are scum about this if I am honest....
..of course the BBCs not at all left leaning (cough). Broadcasting completley unsubstantiated shit with huge political implications isn't that far from hacking personal phone lines. If I was McAlpine I'd be going for millions and Schofield should apologise on air to the PM

Sorry Quids, but it wasn't very clear. I hadn't heard about the This Morning thing with Philip Schofield, and when I looked at your link it didn't mention him, that's why I was confused.


Anyway, I agree that he should at very least make an apology (as should his show producers), very misguided!


RE The BBC, obviously big errors have been made, but I'm not sure where the political bias you talk about is. They have made a huge hash of this though, particularly after last week, I am very surprised that anything on this subject was allowed to air without the green light from the very top, which I suspect it never had.

He should have resigned.


It took him just over three minutes to find the list of names online and, as a so called professional, it appears he didn't actually do any further research into these allegations/rumours.


Question, why pay him more than ?15,000 a year on such evidence? A trainee would't have done any worse.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I have heard similar about both Deptford Green and Elm Green, I believe the latter has some sort of ADHD provision. Deptford Green is much smaller than either Charter, which in hindsight would have been much better. There is so much crowd control in the bigger schools and they are busy and noisy.
    • I would sell it and probably buy another - despite not knowing how reliable the next car would be. This is because if I knew I had to pay the ULEZ that would definitely stop me from using it most of the time, as it has done you. Or sell it and not buy another car but pay for a taxi as and when needed. This would still feel painful to me, so I'd need to keep thinking how much I'd saved by not paying tax, insurance, MOT, repairs etc and see how many taxi fares that covered. 
    • Veering to the right, seriously???? Try Left
    • 2 Friday evening matches. Week 34 fixtures...   Friday 16th May Aston Villa v Tottenham Hotspur Chelsea v Manchester United   Sunday 18th May Everton v Southampton West Ham United v Nottingham Forest Brentford v Fulham Leicester City v Ipswich Town Arsenal v Newcastle United   Monday 19th May Brighton & Hove Albion v Liverpool   Tuesday 20th May Crystal Palace v Wolverhampton Wanderers Manchester City v AFC Bournemouth
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...