Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Jessie Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'm far more interested in what the hospitals and

> children's homes have to say for themselves. BBC

> is a v easy target for right wing press and its

> followers.



Mmmmm. Another sacred cow which can,t be criticised without rasing the normal defensive hogwash? Rubbish, it failed miserably and almost systematically for years on the abuse and more recently by , at best, ignoring it. Not the only guilt party but so what.

it's all starting to sound a bit like the Cleveland Satanic Ring thingy to me now...apparently the main accuser has some form. An enquiry is needed for absolutely clarity and to punish any wromg doers but I feel there is the potential wiff of Conspiracy Theory plus all tories are scum about this if I am honest....
..of course the BBCs not at all left leaning (cough). Broadcasting completley unsubstantiated shit with huge political implications isn't that far from hacking personal phone lines. If I was McAlpine I'd be going for millions and Schofield should apologise on air to the PM

Sorry Quids, but it wasn't very clear. I hadn't heard about the This Morning thing with Philip Schofield, and when I looked at your link it didn't mention him, that's why I was confused.


Anyway, I agree that he should at very least make an apology (as should his show producers), very misguided!


RE The BBC, obviously big errors have been made, but I'm not sure where the political bias you talk about is. They have made a huge hash of this though, particularly after last week, I am very surprised that anything on this subject was allowed to air without the green light from the very top, which I suspect it never had.

He should have resigned.


It took him just over three minutes to find the list of names online and, as a so called professional, it appears he didn't actually do any further research into these allegations/rumours.


Question, why pay him more than ?15,000 a year on such evidence? A trainee would't have done any worse.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Aren't most marxists radical by default...and he was a self proclaimed marxist on his twitter feed for years but deleted it as I suspect it did not sit well at Labour HQ. The big worry for Labour might be that he takes votes away from them (but not enough for him to win a seat) especially as there may be a significant protest vote against them at the national level as they are making such a pig's ear of things. I suspect though Labour are glad to see the back of him - to say he was a thorn in their side is an understatement and his loss of the leadership of the council was clearly part of the purge Labour has been embarking on to rid itself of some of the far-left lunatic fringe that have blighted them for so long. The Greens of course are willingly take any disaffected far-left Labour rejects in the same way Reform are hovvering up the lunatic elements of the Tories. The fact he went in with both barrels on Labour is hardly surprisingly but wonderfully hypocritical of someone who thought they were about to lead a Labour council. My how politicians flip-flop to suit their own personal agenda. How long before he falls out with the Greens...where to then? Why do I think he had an affiliation with the Greens before he became a Labour councillor? Or did I imagine that?
    • It’s a shame that that topic is closed/archived for further replies.  It sounds like a great and helpful business. I’d love to see some of the pictures that had been posted.
    • Hello, Do you have an older but still useable laptop for sale? I mainly need one for filling in forms online. Thanks for reading.   M a TT 
    • Many of you will recall my previous posts seeking recommendation of local eateries for a family meal. Having vegetarians, those who cannot take dairy products or  are gluten intolerant  we  were looking at a menu which could accommodate everyone's requirements. Having been to Love Dulwich twice in t he past for lunch, we went again and discovered that we could reserve for 10 people (would have been 12 ). I am pleased to say Love Dulwich did not disappoint - a wide choice, beautifully cooked and presented, adults and kids loved the food. We booked for 7 pm and were surprised at the number of people already dining there, with several more coming through the evening. Service was good and coped well with multiple orders. Well recommended. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...