Jump to content

Recommended Posts

peckham_ryu Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> That?s a pain. I end up cleaning tags off my house

> a few times a year. Some are easier than others.

>

> Based on where I saw him pause, I think last

> night?s tagger was spraying ?PATS?:

> https://i.imgur.com/wRYtzc6.jpg


Interesting that he appears to have obliterated someone else's tag...I have noticed an increase in tagging since the covid 19

peckham_ryu Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The chap I watched last

> night was a nicely dressed twenty-something in a

> button-down shirt with a preppy leather-strapped

> backpack. When he got to outside my house he

> looked around furtively (although not upwards to

> where I was) and started shaking his can: my wall

> is like catnip for taggers. When I called down and

> politely asked him not to do it, he stopped and

> ambled off. The whole experience was all terribly

> middle class.



I think that description fits the guy who tagged the undertakers opposite me. Only wall that's cleaned up regularly on Rye Lane.


His girlfriend waited patiently further down the road.

KidKruger Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> So alice you can do even better work by explaining

> what you mean by your initial comment above.

> That would be good work.

>

Says the person refusing to explain what they meant by their initial comment above

alice Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Like you did in your 06.45 post!


If you are referring to my inquiry as to what was on your mind you will find it was certainly related to this thread as you had clearly expressed concern.

To stop you from getting excited that you can continuing trolling here... just don't I'm not interested.

If you have something to get off your chest regarding the topic of graffiti and tagging then please do but no, don't suggestively aim anything at me thank you.

Posted by alice Yesterday, 08:44PM, ?What a nasty thread?.


OK so let?s remove alice?s excuse for not backing-up her ?What a nasty thread? post..


The alice person over a number of threads has commented on / hauled people up over (what one can only assume is) their comments on variously race, wealth/privilege, younger generations (ie. yoof) behaviour.

I assume this time it?s because someone mentioned their assumptions on profiling for taggers.

I?m just calling it out for what (I think) it is - an attempt to scold posters for (again, what I believe is) innocent and well-intended comments, their only misdemeanour being that it?s perhaps possible, if you?re hell-bent on doing so, to extract something racist, wealth-privileged or anti-youth from them.

By far most people posting are pretty well balanced and reasonable, not requiring the ?unelected comment police? to moderate and censor our posts for us.

That?s my point in my post, and I hope no-one perceives my post as incendiary, but if someone?s gonna act the offendee publicly they should be called out when it?s over the top - publicly.

There?s been too much of this soft-accusing lately and it?s a reverse form of bullying IMO.

And no, I?m not going to trawl through your past posts to give you ?evidence?, you know full well your own posting history.


OK alice, no distractions, no excuses, what do mean by ?What a nasty thread? ?!

Grow a spine and be honest.


I?m betting you cannot do that.

Here you pk, feast on that.

Now, what in the world did YOU think I meant in my post earlier ?!

You?re acting all ignorant like you haven?t the capacity to understand, when you actually have - the fact that you?re able to stay conscious and actually type proves that.

So, what did you think I meant - spell it out.

Or is it a case of you?re dumb now cos you ain?t answering in full - seeing as you want to set the bar there ?!

KidKruger Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Here you pk, feast on that.

> Now, what in the world did YOU think I meant in my

> post earlier ?!


You were very nonspecific so hard to tell but you were obviously dancing around an issue which you can?t tolerate when others do it


> So, what did you think I meant - spell it out.

> Or is it a case of you?re dumb now cos you ain?t

> answering in full - seeing as you want to set the

> bar there ?!


Answering in full, I don?t know why you refuse to be clear about what you?re saying, cos eg ?various cards? is in fact not very clear so I don?t know what you meant but I think your comments were not very thought thru

Ha ha!! I was looking for exactly that YouTube clip earlier, and was going to attach it but couldn?t figure out how to embed it. Exactly the phrase that springs to mind!

Good track too.



Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

saw this. Maybe let's all have a time out for

> reflection...

KidKruger Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> pk

> Grow a spine and answer the question - you?ve a

> gob enough to pursue someone else for an answer,


I asked you what you meant and you won?t tell me

You just bang on about me telling you what you meant

That?s weird


> so do it yourself.

> ?what in the world did YOU think I meant in my

> post earlier ?!?


I don?t know


Please see my answer immediately above your question


Is it my turn for an answer now?


You might better placed to explain you meant

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Having enjoyed a day with Sayce HolmesLewis, I understand what you’re saying.  I appreciate your courage responding on here. 
    • Thank you to everyone who has already shared their thoughts on this. Dawson Heights Estate in the 1980s, while not as infamous as some other estates, did have its share of anti-social behaviour and petty crime. My brother often used the estate as a shortcut when coming home from his girlfriend’s house, despite my parents warning him many times to avoid it. Policing during that era had a distinctly “tough on crime” approach. Teenagers, particularly those from working-class areas or minority communities, were routinely stopped, questioned, and in some cases, physically handled for minor infractions like loitering, skateboarding, or underage drinking. Respect for authority wasn’t just expected—it was demanded. Talking back to a police officer could escalate a situation very quickly, often with harsh consequences. This was a very different time. There were no body cameras, dash cams, or social media to hold anyone accountable or to provide a record of encounters. Policing was far more physical and immediate, with few technological safeguards to check officer behaviour. My brother wasn’t known to the police. He held a full-time job at the Army and Navy store in Lewisham and had recently been accepted into the army. Yet, on that night, he ran—not because he was guilty of anything—but because he knew exactly what would happen if he were caught on an estate late at night with a group of other boys. He was scared, and rightfully so.
    • I'm sure many people would look to see if someone needed help, and if so would do something about it, and at least phone the police if necessary if they didn't feel confident helping directly. At least I hope so. I'm sorry you don't feel safe, but surely ED isn't any less safe than most places. It's hardly a hotbed of crime, it's just that people don't post on here if nothing has happened! And before that, there were no highwaymen,  or any murders at all .... In what way exactly have we become "a soft apologetic society", whatever that means?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...