Jump to content

Advice Wanted Wednesdays Cheeky C's for 18m to 4 yrs A Good Idea???


Recommended Posts

Hi


The Wednesdays sessions at Cheeky C's is the only session that runs from 9.30-11.00 and is unfortunately very low on numbers, I was thinking that I may get more children and parents attending if I made Wednesdays a 18m-4yrs sessions.


This would mean I have no baby section and more of the older stuff ie pens and paints and glue activities in the art sections, the farm duplo set that contains small pieces, a bigger area for the cars and scuttles bugs to be rolled around in and the complete shopping and kitchen set with coins and small play food and all the building activities and train set.


What does everyone think, good idea, bad idea, suggestions, would you go if your child is 18m-4 yrs??


Any advice is welcome.


Thank you


Annabelle

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that sounds like a great idea! I've found that once you get to 2yrs many groups and classes are aimed at younger babies so I would definitely be interested in coming along to a session geared specifically to older ones. The only question I have is would baby siblings be welcome? I have a newborn so looking for a group to take my toddler to where he will be occupied but I will be able to sit and breastfeed - Wednesday Cheeky C's sounds ideal.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unfortunately my children are now at school and nursery every morning however I just want to say I think it's a great idea. I thought Cheeky's C's was by far and away my favourite activity - and I've been to a lot in my 5 years as a mum. I pray you start getting more people

xxx

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • LTNs were pushed by the Conservative government (as was ULEZ which you also disapprove of). They were one of several active travel measures which were a condition of the TFL funding settlement post Covid.  £69m of direct borough funding (per year) was also provided to support more localised investment in walking and cycling schemes across the city…but we all know schnapps is a secret commie 🤣 I’ve no idea. I do know that people are covering their plates and driving through, and that’s probably an accident waiting to happen (although clearly down to signage 🤣). The emergency services have agreed the changes, so I would assume that on balance they think it’s the right move. Whilst ‘One’ are suggesting the emergency services have agreed the changes under pressure, they wont say what sort of pressure, or from who 🤔. Perhaps it’s the commies again 🤣😂
    • A bit like this: https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2024/apr/27/tory-staff-running-network-of-anti-ulez-facebook-groups-riddled-with-racism-and-abuse
    • Because the council responsible for it is far-left....   And you haven't answered whether it is worth diverting emergency vehicles because a few cars drive through the LTN and why some lobby groups have been so desperate to close it to emergency vehicles.    Emergency services hate non-permeable junctions as they lengthen response times....f you remember it's why the council had to redesign the DV junction because emergency services kept telling them they needed to be able to drive through it...but the council resisted and resisted until they finally relented because the emergency services said their LTN had increased response times....sorry if the truth gets in the way of a good story but those are facts. The council was putting lives at risk because they refused to open the junction to emergency services. Why? What could have been the motivation for that? So, in fact, it was the emergency services who forced the council (kicking and screaming) to remove the permanent barriers and allow emergency services access. So the council finally opened the junction to emergency services and is now coming back to re-close part of the junction.  Why?  Perhaps you should be asking who is lobbying the council to close the junction or parts of it or why the council is happy to waste so much of our money on it - who are they representing as even their own consultation demonstrated they did not have support from the local community for the measures? The results showed the majority of local residents were against the measure...but they are going ahead with them anyway.   In time, I am sure the truth will come to light and those rewponsbile will be held accountable but you have to admit there is something very unusual going on with that junction - its the very definition of a (very expensive) white elephant.    
    • A Roadblock that a civilised society wouldn’t allow. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...