Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi


The Wednesdays sessions at Cheeky C's is the only session that runs from 9.30-11.00 and is unfortunately very low on numbers, I was thinking that I may get more children and parents attending if I made Wednesdays a 18m-4yrs sessions.


This would mean I have no baby section and more of the older stuff ie pens and paints and glue activities in the art sections, the farm duplo set that contains small pieces, a bigger area for the cars and scuttles bugs to be rolled around in and the complete shopping and kitchen set with coins and small play food and all the building activities and train set.


What does everyone think, good idea, bad idea, suggestions, would you go if your child is 18m-4 yrs??


Any advice is welcome.


Thank you


Annabelle

I think that sounds like a great idea! I've found that once you get to 2yrs many groups and classes are aimed at younger babies so I would definitely be interested in coming along to a session geared specifically to older ones. The only question I have is would baby siblings be welcome? I have a newborn so looking for a group to take my toddler to where he will be occupied but I will be able to sit and breastfeed - Wednesday Cheeky C's sounds ideal.

Unfortunately my children are now at school and nursery every morning however I just want to say I think it's a great idea. I thought Cheeky's C's was by far and away my favourite activity - and I've been to a lot in my 5 years as a mum. I pray you start getting more people

xxx

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I normally vote Lib Dem and will continue to do so.
    • the reason Tories have lost votes is because they have lost trust primarily. the voters didn't vote for what the Tories did, but what they promised. you can't blame the voters for the outcome, just because they voted for the party. Labour are in a position of influence so we will have to see what they do.  Reform are there, as quite a presence should Labour continue to fail. It feels as if we are on a very thin line
    • I agree with that The voters authorised strong austerity in 2010 and kept voting for it for 14 years - for that reason alone, given Labour have been in power for only months I can't find my else able to equate them as bad as each other. Yet. It may happen and given Labour's poor decision making and comms to date I wouldn't be surprised if they end up that way Problem is the voters say they want one thing (lower prices/better public services/things working) but then don't reward any government that tries to deliver -  and they explicitly said they wanted higher prices with Brexit and lower public services by voting Cons in for 14 years - so they got what they wanted, they just don't like the reality Whoever is elected now has to find a way to address those years of underinvestment and diminished growth - there is no painless way out. But blaming immigration for everything (Reform speciality) is only making everything worse
    • That’s good to know, but it just wasn’t clear to me.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...