Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I suggest that Southwark Events should be active communicating with ward Councillors to withhold support given the lack of licences? Rather indulgent/perverse of Cllrs to support this given the weddings, funerals, events generally that are barred at present.........


alice Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Yes that is the advice I was given by Southwark

> council today.

Hmmm, a bit confused. There's at least one poster on here who was defending the overnight revellers on Peckham Rye with their sound systems and littering and noise (when other posters were questioning it), yet seems to think a tea dance on a Saturday morning is worth trying to stop.

Inconsistent. Yet consistent.

tomskip Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Yes, contradictory posts about late night/early

> morning gatherings on Dawsons Hill too.


I suspect it's the new sort of politics where everything is seen through the prism of one argument.


But many politicians seem happy with that.

well there is that too....where all-nighters and littering is just kids being kids.


tomskip Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Yes, contradictory posts about late night/early

> morning gatherings on Dawsons Hill too.

It's also an offence to wilfully obstructs the free passage along a highway in any way without lawful authority and these events stop people from freely cycling along that road or turning their cars and lorries around as they are entitled to do.

How does having people standing within a blocked off road, one which is closed to motorised traffic but accessible to cyclists and pedestrians stop people turning round lorries????





Abe_froeman Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It's also an offence to wilfully obstructs the

> free passage along a highway in any way without

> lawful authority and these events stop people from

> freely cycling along that road or turning their

> cars and lorries around as they are entitled to

> do.

slarti b Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> You seem to have no idea we are in the middle of a

> pandemic. Look at this and tell me if it complies

> with Govt guidelines and rules about public

> events.

>

> https://twitter.com/DulwichSquare/status/129223098

> 1877891074




That is the funniest thread I have seen in a while.


Sadly, but unsuprisingly, the labour councillors are all on board,

so I cannot see turning to them for help being of any help at all.

Despite constantly commenting, it appears you?ve never been to the closure. It?s blocked off at calton, dulwich village and court. It?s not a turning circle. The part where they are standing is no motorised vehicles!





Abe_froeman Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> If you wanted to drive your lorry down CAlton

> Avenue, pick up an ice cream and then turn around

> and go home again, it would bee rather tricky with

> all these people sitting on deckchairs int he

> middle of the turning space

The ideas around streets are changing. If the street is a living space where people can do a mixture of things it is no longer simply a highway with parking space. I know this subject is highly charged and I don't want to add fuel to the fire. But it is worth imagining the way streets could change.


The idea of traffic 'evaporation' is well documented and worth believing in.


https://londonlivingstreets.com/2019/07/11/evaporating-traffic-impact-of-low-traffic-neighbourhoods-on-main-roads/

andrewc Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The ideas around streets are changing. If the

> street is a living space where people can do a

> mixture of things it is no longer simply a highway

> with parking space. I know this subject is highly

> charged and I don't want to add fuel to the fire.

> But it is worth imagining the way streets could

> change.

>

> The idea of traffic 'evaporation' is well

> documented and worth believing in.

>

> https://londonlivingstreets.com/2019/07/11/evapora

> ting-traffic-impact-of-low-traffic-neighbourhoods-

> on-main-roads/



And anyone who studied geography will tell you when something evaporates it condenses and then falls as rain elsewhere....which is exactly what these closures cause....

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • It required legislation to identify the beneficial owners of properties in the UK held by overseas companies - and these still haven't been properly disclosed - ownership of things isn't just a google search away - and to suggest otherwise is not to understand how capitalism works. Unless you (cyclemonkey) do have access to that knowledge and would like to share.
    • "Mysterious owners" 😆  If only there was a powerful search engine at our fingertips to find out such deep secrets.        
    • It's the "due to commercial reasons" line again that is vexing. Last year it seemed, although there was a similar level of objection, that the reasons were commercial - Gala didn't appear entirely prepared to run 3 more events, or more likely didn't have sufficient interest from other promoters / organisers who could 'sub-let' the site as with Brockwell Park (I believe?). This year they appeared more organised, had another year to plan & prepare, to the extent they actually had names for two of the three new events which indicated to me that they had third party promoters / organisers in place.  So yes, it does make you wonder whether the repeated level of objection, combined with the impending elections, led to the council 'advising' that maybe they shelve it again? I'm afraid I can't see the whole extension application just being a ruse to guarantee permission for the 'regular' event. Gala are a commercial venture with ambition - every festival's business plan is to expand, expand, expand, year on year on year. Gala won't give up until they have taken over the whole park for a Summer of Raves, and the mysterious owners are on their yachts counting their ££££
    • Thanks for that. Maybe forthcoming elections have stymied the 7 day request? If Labour get back in, do we think GALA will try with greater success in 2027?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...